Mate choice and body pattern variations in the Crown Butterfly fish Chaetodon paucifasciatus (Chaetodontidae)

ABSTRACT Mate choice is an important ecological behavior in fish, and is often based on visual cues of body patterns. The Crown Butterfly fish Chaetodon paucifasciatus (Chaetodontidae) is a monogamist, territorial species; it swims in close proximity to its partner throughout most of its life. This species is characterized by a pattern of 6–8 vertical black stripes on a white background, on both sides of its body. Our aim was to define spatial features (variations) in body patterns by evaluating the level of dissimilarity between both sides of each individual fish, and the level of dissimilarity between patterns of different individuals. In addition, we tested whether the fish are attracted to or reject specific features of the body patterns. Features were defined and counted using photographs of body patterns. Attraction to or rejection of specific features were tested behaviorally using a dual-choice experiment of video animations of individuals swimming over a coral-reef background. We found that the patterns of each fish and sides of the body were no less dissimilar, compared intraspecificly to other fish, and that each side pattern was unique and distinguishable. Variations in the patterns occurred mostly in the last three posterior stripes. Individuals were mainly attracted to conspecifics with multiple crossing patterns (two or more consecutive crossings), and rejected patterns with holes. Our results suggest that in this species the unique body pattern of each fish is used for conspecific identification of mates and intruders.

[1]  L. Dugatkin,et al.  Female mating preference for bold males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  J. Dale,et al.  A socially enforced signal of quality in a paper wasp , 2004, Nature.

[4]  A. Sogabe.  Partner recognition in a perennially monogamous pipefish, Corythoichthys haematopterus , 2010, Journal of Ethology.

[5]  J. Endler.  On the measurement and classification of colour in studies of animal colour patterns , 1990 .

[6]  W. Parson,et al.  Colour-assortative mating among populations of Tropheus moorii, a cichlid fish from Lake Tanganyika, East Africa , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  G. Katzir.  Aggression by the damselfish Dascyllus aruanus L. Towards conspecifics and heterospecifics , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  S. Einbinder,et al.  Descending to the twilight-zone: changes in coral reef fish assemblages along a depth gradient down to 65 m , 2008 .

[9]  T. Ehlinger,et al.  Directional sexual selection on chroma and within–pattern colour contrast in Labeotropheus fuelleborni , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  O. Güntürkün,et al.  Asymmetry pays: visual lateralization improves discrimination success in pigeons , 2000, Current Biology.

[12]  E. Brokovich,et al.  Community structure and ecology of butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae) in the Gulf of Aqaba (northern Red Sea) , 2005 .

[13]  H. Fricke.  Pair Swimming and Mutual Partner Guarding in Monogamous Butterflyfish (Pisces, Chaetodontidae): a Joint Advertisement for Territory , 2010 .

[14]  Keri V. Langridge.  Symmetrical crypsis and asymmetrical signalling in the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  M. Morris.  Female preference for trait symmetry in addition to trait size in swordtail fish , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  S. Merilaita,et al.  Fearful symmetry: pattern size and asymmetry affects aposematic signal efficacy , 1999, Evolutionary Ecology.

[17]  Guy Wallis,et al.  A Species of Reef Fish that Uses Ultraviolet Patterns for Covert Face Recognition , 2010, Current Biology.

[18]  U. Siebeck.  Communication in coral reef fish: the role of ultraviolet colour patterns in damselfish territorial behaviour , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  H. Fricke.  Juvenile‐adult Colour Patterns and Coexistence in the Territorial Coral Reef Fish Pomacanthus imperator , 1980 .

[20]  A. Pomiankowski,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection , 1993, Genetica.

[21]  M. Gross,et al.  Courtship and genetic quality: asymmetric males show their best side , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  J. Endler.  Variation in the appearance of guppy color patterns to guppies and their predators under different visual conditions , 1991, Vision Research.

[23]  G. Katzir,et al.  Species recognition in the blackbordered damselfish Dascyllus marginatus (Rüppell): An evaluation of computer-animated playback techniques , 2005 .

[24]  Kathryn E. Arnold.  Kin recognition in rainbowfish (Melanotaenia eachamensis): sex, sibs and shoaling , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[25]  M. Ryan,et al.  Shared Preferences by Predators and Females for Male Ornaments in Swordtails , 2001, The American Naturalist.