Rutting Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures that Contain Recycled Asphalt Pavement

This study evaluated the rutting resistance of plant-produced asphalt concrete (AC) mixtures in the laboratory. Nineteen plant-produced AC mixtures were used; these mixtures contained reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) amounts that ranged from 0% to 25%. Tests on the mixtures included the dynamic modulus (|E*|) test at multiple temperatures and the flow number (FN) test at 54°C to characterize stiffness and rutting resistance, respectively. Mixtures that contained no RAP showed |E*| values comparable to those that contained 25% RAP in most cases. For most of the 19 mixtures tested, mixtures with lower FNs either contained no RAP, contained 25% RAP, or had PG 64-22 as the design binder grade. Mixtures that contained moderate amounts of RAP (10% and 15%), regardless of design binder grade, had higher FNs than mixtures with either high or low RAP amounts. Statistical analysis showed that the RAP amount was the most significant factor to affect rutting resistance in the mixtures studied. A linear inverse relationship between RAP and FN appeared to describe the data well. As the RAP amount increased, a downward trend occurred in both effective binder content (Pbe) and rutting parameter (G*/sin δ). The effect of RAP on FN was unexpected, because it showed the rutting resistance to decrease with increased RAP. Possible reasons might have been the use of softer asphalt binder in mixtures with higher RAP and the observed decrease in both Pbe and G*/sin δ with increased RAP amounts. More rutting-related mechanistic studies are needed of AC mixtures that contain RAP.

[1]  Audrey Copeland,et al.  Field Evaluation of High Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement–Warm-Mix Asphalt Project in Florida , 2010 .

[2]  Mohamed M El-Basyouny,et al.  Effective Temperature for Analysis of Permanent Deformation and Fatigue Distress on Asphalt Mixtures , 2009 .

[3]  G. Huber,et al.  Investigation of Properties of Plant-Produced Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mixtures , 2007 .

[4]  Matthew W Witczak,et al.  Simple Performance Tests: Summary of Recommended Methods and Database , 2005 .

[5]  Krishna Prapoorna Biligiri,et al.  Rational Modeling of Tertiary Flow for Asphalt Mixtures , 2007 .

[6]  Rajib B. Mallick,et al.  Using Warm-Mix Asphalt Technology to Incorporate High Percentage of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Material in Asphalt Mixtures , 2008 .

[7]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement – A Literature Review , 2007 .

[8]  Zhong Wu,et al.  Permanent deformation analysis of hot-mix asphalt mixtures with simple performance tests and 2002 mechanistic-empirical pavement design software , 2006 .

[9]  Elie Y. Hajj,et al.  A Laboratory Evaluation On The Use Of Recycled Asphalt Pavements In HMA Mixtures , 2007 .

[10]  Mihai O. Marasteanu,et al.  Recycled Asphalt Pavement (RAP) Effects on Binder and Mixture Quality , 2004 .

[11]  Mohamed M El-Basyouny,et al.  SIMPLE PERFORMANCE TEST FOR SUPERPAVE MIX DESIGN , 2002 .

[12]  Jo Sias Daniel,et al.  Mechanistic and Volumetric Properties of Asphalt Mixtures with Recycled Asphalt Pavement , 2005 .

[13]  G W Maupin,et al.  Evaluation of Using Higher Percentages of Recycled Asphalt Pavement in Asphalt Mixes in Virginia , 2008 .

[14]  Matthew W Witczak Specification Criteria for Simple Performance Tests for Rutting: Volume I: Dynamic Modulus (E*) and Volume II: Flow Number and Flow Time , 2007 .