Qualitative analysis to determine decision-makers' attitudes towards e-government services in a De-Facto state

The manner in which people, businesses and governments perform is changing because of the spread of technology. Digitalization of governments can be considered a necessity as we are now entering the era of the Internet-of-Things. The advantages and disadvantages of electronic governments have been examined in several research studies. This study aims to examine the attitudes of decision-makers towards e-government. The research aims are as follows: to determine the problems related with e-government usage, to establish the factors which decrease the usage of e-government services and to propose recommendations for the effective application of e-government practices.,Qualitative research has been used for the study. Participants were chosen by the snowball sampling method, and face-to-face in-depth interviews were conducted with all decision-makers. In-depth interviews are more efficient and enable the acquisition of better qualitative information, in-depth knowledge and statistics, as the distance between the interviewer and interviewee is reduced (Stokes and Bergin, 2006). Questions asked can be categorized under two sections, where the questions in the first section are related to the decision-maker’s management style/managerial proposition, and in the second section, technological questions are asked in terms of the preferred communication method and the decision-makers’ attitudes towards e-government practices.,Decision-makers perceive electronic government to be important, while the level of importance is observed to be different among the decision-makers. Chronic problems exist in many countries, such as nepotism, where the decision-makers have conflicting arguments about e-government and the resulting effect on nepotism. Furthermore, the study also indicates that decision-makers are aware of the importance of mobile government, although they acknowledge that more time is required, as their country is still developing. Electronic voting is also perceived to be important, although the decision-makers believe that security and privacy issues need to be solved before related projects can be initiated.,This research can be a benchmark study for the decision-makers of small island developing states by means of e-government. The impediments preventing the effective application of e-government practices are also discussed in the study. This study will be useful to highlight the triggers and obstacles for e-government development in the context of a developing country. Internet penetration has increased significantly since the 2000s, and therefore, decision-makers need to consider the shift in citizens’ behaviour, such as the high usage of smartphones and the emergence of the Internet-of-Things (Kaya and Bicen, 2016; Kumar et al., 2017).

[1]  Hüseyin Bicen,et al.  The effects of social media on students' behaviors; Facebook as a case study , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  M. Germann,et al.  Internet voting and turnout: Evidence from Switzerland , 2017 .

[3]  Anne Powell,et al.  e-Voting intent: A comparison of young and elderly voters , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  Jin Sangki,et al.  Vision of future e-government via new e-government maturity model: Based on Korea's e-government practices , 2017, Telecommunications Policy.

[5]  David A. Wagner,et al.  Analyzing internet voting security , 2004, CACM.

[6]  Changlin Wang,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of perceived value in Mobile Government continuance use: An empirical research in China , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Sehl Mellouli,et al.  From citizens to government policy-makers: Social media data analysis , 2019, Gov. Inf. Q..

[8]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[9]  Norman E. Youngblood Revisiting Alabama state website accessibility , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[10]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  eParticipation research: Systematizing the field , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[11]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  Jalel Ben-Othman,et al.  Real-time detection of MAC layer misbehavior in mobile ad hoc networks , 2017 .

[13]  Mutaz M. Al-Debei,et al.  The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and use , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Uwe Serdült,et al.  What drives fidelity to internet voting? Evidence from the roll-out of internet voting in Switzerland , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[15]  N. Franke,et al.  Decision-makers’ underestimation of user innovation , 2019, Research Policy.

[16]  Zahir Irani,et al.  The role of stakeholders in the effective use of e-government resources in public services , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[17]  Endrit Kromidha,et al.  Strategic e-government development and the role of benchmarking , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  Taewoo Nam,et al.  Determining the type of e-government use , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  The University of Bradford Institutional Repository , 2022 .

[20]  Akemi Takeoka Chatfield,et al.  Collaborative Governance Matters to E-Government Interoperability: An Analysis of Citizen-Centric Integrated Interoperable E-Government Implementation in Saudi Arabia , 2015 .

[21]  Antonio Muñoz-Cañavate,et al.  Electronic Administration in Spain: From Its Beginnings to the Present , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[23]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  E-government discourses: An inductive analysis , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[24]  Gary Grudnitski Eliciting Decision-Makers' Information Requirements: Application of the Rep Test Methodology , 1984, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  Citizens' engagement on local governments' Facebook sites. An empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in Western Europe , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[26]  Frank P. Lambert,et al.  Seeking electronic information from government resources: A comparative analysis of two communities' web searching of municipal government websites , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[27]  Arindam Mukherjee,et al.  Qualitative approach to determine user experience of e-government services , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Evaluating the use and impact of Web 2.0 technologies in local government , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[29]  Dennis Linders,et al.  From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..