Accounting for habitat loss rates in sequential reserve selection : Simple methods for large problems

We develop reserve selection methods for maximizing either species retention in the landscape or species representation in reserve areas. These methods are developed in the context of sequential reserve selection, where site acquisition is done over a number of years, yearly budgets are limited and habitat loss may cause some sites to become unavailable during the planning period. The main methodological development of this study is what we call a site-ordering algorithm, which maximizes representation within selected sites at the end of the planning period, while accounting for habitat loss rates in optimization. Like stochastic dynamic programming, which is an approach that guarantees a globally optimal solution, the ordering algorithm generates a sequence in which sites are ideally acquired. As a distinction from stochastic dynamic programming, the ordering is generated via a relatively fast approximate process, which involves hierarchic application of the principle of maximization of marginal gain. In our comparisons, the ordering algorithm emerges a clear winner, it does well in terms of retention and is superior to simple heuristics in terms of representation within reserves. Unlike stochastic dynamic programming, the ordering algorithm is applicable to relatively large problem sizes, with reasonable computation times expected for problems involving thousands of sites.

[1]  M. Drechsler Probabilistic approaches to scheduling reserve selection , 2005 .

[2]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[3]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Economic Reasons for Conserving Wild Nature , 2002, Science.

[4]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Prioritizing global conservation efforts , 2006, Nature.

[5]  H. Possingham,et al.  The mathematics of designing a network of protected areas for conservation , 1993 .

[6]  Andrew R. Solow,et al.  A note on optimal algorithms for reserve site selection , 1996 .

[7]  S. Polasky,et al.  Dynamic reserve site selection , 2004 .

[8]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Replacement cost: A practical measure of site value for cost-effective reserve planning , 2006 .

[9]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice , 1991 .

[10]  I. R. Johnson,et al.  Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal , 1994, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[11]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Reserve Selection Using Nonlinear Species Distribution Models , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Les G. Underhill,et al.  Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms , 1994 .

[13]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Maximising phylogenetic diversity in the selection of networks of conservation areas , 2002 .

[14]  M Cabeza,et al.  Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world , 2004 .

[16]  S. Andelman,et al.  Mathematical Methods for Identifying Representative Reserve Networks , 2000 .

[17]  Richard L. Church,et al.  The maximal covering location problem , 1974 .

[18]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Is maximizing protection the same as minimizing loss? Efficiency and retention as alternative measures of the effectiveness of proposed reserves , 2004 .

[19]  Charles S. ReVelle,et al.  Spatial attributes and reserve design models: A review , 2005 .

[20]  Bo Jellesmark Thorsen,et al.  Optimal reserve selection in a dynamic world , 2006 .

[21]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  The use of stochastic dynamic programming in optimal landscape reconstruction for metapopulations , 2003 .

[22]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity , 1988 .

[23]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Area‐Based Refinement for Selection of Reserve Sites with the Benefit‐Function Approach , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[24]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  The Value of Biodiversity in Reserve Selection: Representation, Species Weighting, and Benefit Functions , 2005 .

[25]  S. Ferson,et al.  Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology , 2002, Springer New York.

[26]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Landscape Zonation, benefit functions and target-based planning: Unifying reserve selection strategies , 2007 .

[28]  Will R Turner,et al.  Adaptive Decision Rules for the Acquisition of Nature Reserves , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[29]  Stephanie A. Snyder,et al.  A Scenario Optimization Model for Dynamic Reserve Site Selection , 2004 .

[30]  Charles ReVelle,et al.  Metropolitan Open‐Space Protection with Uncertain Site Availability , 2005 .