A MOOC-Based Flipped Class: Lessons Learned from the Orchestration Perspective

This paper presents the results of a case study about the orchestration process of a MOOC-based flipped-class, and the students’ adoption of this teaching practice. The study was conducted on a mandatory third-year course on Organizational Behavior in the School of Engineering at Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile with 346 students. The analysis shows that students pay more attention in class and are more participative, even though this means more work and study. Also, implementing this strategy is much more work for the teacher than giving a traditional face-to-face lecture, but the students pay more attention in class and are more participative. Furthermore, up to 96% of the students were active in the MOOC under study before class, especially watching the video-lectures, and students who were more active in the MOOC showed better scores on the course exams than those less active, a difference that proves to be statistically significant. These findings suggest that a MOOC-based flipped class is a good solution to promote student’s motivation and learning, but the implementation of this teaching strategy is delicate and must be very well planned. We provide a list of lessons learned about five key factors to be considered when orchestrating a MOOC-based flipped classroom: design, management, awareness, adaptation and role of actors.

[1]  C. Phillips,et al.  The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review , 2015, Internet High. Educ..

[2]  Mahmoud Abdulwahed,et al.  Orchestrating technology enhanced learning: a literature review and a conceptual framework , 2011 .

[3]  Daniëlle Verstegen,et al.  The promised land of blended learning: Quizzes as a moderator , 2015 .

[4]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Mixing and blending MOOC Technologies with face-to-face pedagogies , 2015, 2015 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).

[5]  Luis P. Prieto,et al.  Orchestration in learning technology research: evaluation of a conceptual framework , 2015 .

[6]  Sarah Elizabeth Zappe,et al.  The evolution of a flipped classroom: Evidence-based recommendations , 2015 .

[7]  Emilie Ludeman,et al.  An Integrative Review of Flipped Classroom Teaching Models in Nursing Education. , 2017, Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

[8]  Johan Van Niekerk,et al.  The effectiveness of brain-compatible blended learning material in the teaching of programming logic , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Tips and Techniques for MOOC Production , 2015, ITiCSE.

[10]  Pauline Roux,et al.  Quality of qualitative research in the health sciences: Analysis of the common criteria present in 58 assessment guidelines by expert users. , 2016, Social science & medicine.

[11]  Teklu Abate Bekele,et al.  Motivation and Satisfaction in Internet-Supported Learning Environments: A Review , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[12]  Ismene Ithaí Bras Ruiz Los MOOC en números: un análisis para comenzar la reflexión , 2016 .

[13]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[14]  David E. Pritchard,et al.  A MOOC based on blended pedagogy , 2016, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[15]  Roberto Martinez-Maldonado Seeing learning analytics tools as orchestration technologies: Towards supporting learning activities across physical and digital spaces , 2016 .