Visual displays for communicating scientific uncertainty in influenza forecasts
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Woloshin,et al. Communicating health information with visual displays , 2023, Nature Medicine.
[2] Tyler J. Adkins,et al. Graphs do not lead people to infer causation from correlation. , 2022, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[3] Lace M. K. Padilla,et al. Mapping the Landscape of COVID-19 Crisis Visualizations , 2020, CHI.
[4] M. McDowell,et al. Risk communication in tables versus text: a registered report randomized trial on ‘fact boxes' , 2020, Royal Society Open Science.
[5] Jonathan J. Rolison,et al. Understanding Health Risk Comprehension: The Role of Math Anxiety, Subjective Numeracy, and Objective Numeracy , 2020, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[6] Eric R. Stone,et al. Probability Size Matters: The Effect of Foreground‐Only versus Foreground+Background Graphs on Risk Aversion Diminishes with Larger Probabilities , 2020, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[7] Melissa A. Z. Knoll,et al. Despite high objective numeracy, lower numeric confidence relates to worse financial and medical outcomes , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[8] David J. Spiegelhalter,et al. Communicating uncertainty about facts, numbers and science , 2019, Royal Society Open Science.
[9] R. Rosenfeld,et al. A collaborative multiyear, multimodel assessment of seasonal influenza forecasting in the United States , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[10] D. Spiegelhalter,et al. The Met Office Weather Game: investigating how different methods for presenting probabilistic weather forecasts influence decision-making , 2018, Geoscience Communication.
[11] Philip D. Waggoner,et al. The shape of and solutions to the MTurk quality crisis , 2018, Political Science Research and Methods.
[12] Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al. Decision making with visualizations: a cognitive framework across disciplines , 2018, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.
[13] Sean A. Munson,et al. Uncertainty Displays Using Quantile Dotplots or CDFs Improve Transit Decision-Making , 2018, CHI.
[14] Aaron M. Scherer,et al. Communicating infectious disease prevalence through graphics: Results from an international survey , 2017, Vaccine.
[15] Edward T. Cokely,et al. Designing Visual Aids That Promote Risk Literacy: A Systematic Review of Health Research and Evidence-Based Design Heuristics , 2017, Hum. Factors.
[16] Rocio Garcia-Retamero,et al. Measuring Graph Literacy without a Test , 2016, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[17] P. Resnick,et al. Hypothetical Outcome Plots Outperform Error Bars and Violin Plots for Inferences about Reliability of Variable Ordering , 2015, PloS one.
[18] Edward T. Cokely,et al. Individual Differences in Graph Literacy: Overcoming Denominator Neglect in Risk Comprehension , 2012 .
[19] Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al. Representing Category and Continuum: Visualizing Thought , 2012, Diagrams.
[20] Priti Shah,et al. Bar and Line Graph Comprehension: An Interaction of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Processes , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[21] B. Tversky. Visualizing Thought , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[22] M. Galesic,et al. Graph Literacy , 2011, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[23] Jeffrey Heer,et al. Crowdsourcing graphical perception: using mechanical turk to assess visualization design , 2010, CHI.
[24] Luc Anselin,et al. Visualizing Seismic Risk and Uncertainty , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[25] P. Ubel,et al. Measuring Numeracy without a Math Test: Development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[26] P. Ubel,et al. Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: Effects of Low Numeracy on Comprehension of Risk Communications and Utility Elicitations , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[27] N. Schwarz. Metacognitive Experiences: Response to Commentaries , 2004 .
[28] Susan N. Friel,et al. Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. , 2001 .
[29] Paul U. Lee,et al. Lines, Blobs, Crosses and Arrows: Diagrammatic Communication with Schematic Figures , 2000, Diagrams.
[30] Jeffery. M. Zacks,et al. Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication , 1999, Memory & cognition.
[31] S. Tetewsky. Familiarity effects in visual comparison tasks and their implications for studying human intelligence. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[32] B. Tversky,et al. Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.
[33] Alisha Malik,et al. A Psycholinguistic Analysis of the Reading Behavior of EFL-Proficient Readers Using Culturally Familiar and Culturally Nonfamiliar Expository Texts , 1990 .
[34] M. Granger Morgan,et al. Graphical Communication of Uncertain Quantities to Nontechnical People , 1987 .
[35] Herbert A. Simon,et al. Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..
[36] J. G. Hollands,et al. The visual communication of risk. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[37] Eric R. Stone,et al. Effects of numerical and graphical displays on professed risk-taking behavior. , 1997 .
[38] Steven Pinker,et al. A theory of graph comprehension. , 1990 .
[39] Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al. Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation , 2009, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.