Assessment for learning in the accountability era: queensland, australia

Abstract Developments in school education in Australia over the past decade have witnessed the rise of national efforts to reform curriculum, assessment and reporting. Constitutionally the power to decide on curriculum matters still resides with the States. Higher stakes in assessment, brought about by national testing and international comparative analyses of student achievement data, have challenged State efforts to maintain the emphasis on assessment to promote learning while fulfilling accountability demands. In this article lessons from the Queensland experience indicate that it is important to build teachers’ assessment capacity and their assessment literacy for the promotion of student learning. It is argued that teacher assessment can be a source of dependable results through moderation practice. The Queensland Studies Authority has recognised and supported the development of teacher assessment and moderation practice in the context of standards-driven, national reform. Recent research findings explain how the focus on learning can be maintained by avoiding an over-interpretation of test results in terms of innate ability and limitations and by encouraging teachers to adopt more tailored diagnosis of assessment data to address equity through a focus on achievement for all. Such efforts are challenged as political pressures related to the Australian government's implementation of national testing and national partnership funding arrangements tied to the performance of students at or below minimum standards become increasingly apparent.

[1]  Lenore Adie,et al.  Moderation as Judgement Practice: Reconciling System Level Accountability and Local Level Practice , 2007 .

[2]  J. Gee Opportunity to Learn: A language-based perspective on assessment , 2003 .

[3]  Valentina Klenowski,et al.  Australian Indigenous students: addressing equity issues in assessment , 2009 .

[4]  Claire Maree Wyatt-Smith,et al.  Standards, Teacher Judgement and Moderation in Contexts of National Curriculum and Assessment Reform , 2010 .

[5]  G. Whitty Revisiting school knowledge: some sociological perspectives on new school curricula , 2010 .

[6]  S. Ball,et al.  Class Strategies and the Education Market: The Middle Classes and Social Advantage , 2003 .

[7]  A. Reid Public education and democracy: a changing relationship in a globalizing world , 2002 .

[8]  T. Mccarty The impact of high‐stakes accountability policies on Native American learners: evidence from research , 2009 .

[9]  C. Buckendahl,et al.  Informing State Assessment from the Local Level: A District's Reflections. , 2001 .

[10]  Stephanie Gunn,et al.  The centrality of teachers’ judgement practice in assessment: a study of standards in moderation , 2010 .

[11]  Gordon Stobart,et al.  Testing Times: The Uses and Abuses of Assessment , 2008 .

[12]  Wynne Harlen,et al.  Trusting teachers’ judgement: research evidence of the reliability and validity of teachers’ assessment used for summative purposes , 2005 .

[13]  Factors affecting writing achievement: mapping teacher beliefs , 2004 .

[14]  C. Gipps Beyond Testing: Towards a Theory of Educational Assessment , 1994 .

[15]  Examining how moderation is enacted within an assessment policy reform initiative: You just have to learn how to see , 2008 .

[16]  D. Royce Sadler,et al.  Interpretations of criteria‐based assessment and grading in higher education , 2005 .

[17]  Valentina Klenowski Evaluation of the effectiveness of the consensus-based standards validation process , 2007 .

[18]  Valentina Klenowski Evaluation Report of the Pilot of the 2005 Queensland Assessment Task (QAT) , 2006 .

[19]  R. Patrick Perspectives on Change: A Continued Struggle for Academic Success and Cultural Relevancy at an American Indian School in the Midst of No Child Left Behind. , 2008 .

[20]  Patricia Broadfoot An Introduction to Assessment , 2007 .

[21]  Dale Mason,et al.  AUSTRALIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE , 1993 .

[22]  Colin J Marsh,et al.  Key concepts for understanding curriculum , 1992 .

[23]  Claire Wyatt-Smith,et al.  Standards-driven reform years 1–10: Moderation an optional extra? , 2010 .

[24]  Mark R. Wilson,et al.  Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability , 2004 .