Diagnostic performance and cost of CT angiography versus stress ECG--a randomized prospective study of suspected acute coronary syndrome chest pain in the emergency department (CT-COMPARE).
暂无分享,去创建一个
J. Chan | M. Hansen | K. Branch | C. Hamilton-Craig | D. Walters | M. Pincus | A. Fifoot
[1] J. Deckers,et al. Is it cost-effective to use a test to decide which individuals with an intermediate cardiovascular disease risk would benefit from statin treatment? , 2014, International journal of cardiology.
[2] J. Younger,et al. The approach to patients with possible cardiac chest pain , 2013, The Medical journal of Australia.
[3] T. Villines,et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[4] J. Fleg,et al. Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.
[5] C. Reid,et al. 2-Hour accelerated diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms using contemporary troponins as the only biomarker: the ADAPT trial. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[6] C. Gatsonis,et al. CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.
[7] Janet M. Busey,et al. Economic outcome of cardiac CT-based evaluation and standard of care for suspected acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department: a decision analytic model. , 2012, Academic radiology.
[8] N. Paul,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography according to pre-test probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary arterial calcification. The CORE-64 (Coronary Artery Evaluation Using 64-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography) International Multicenter , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[9] J. Lima,et al. Coronary artery stenoses: accuracy of 64-detector row CT angiography in segments with mild, moderate, or severe calcification--a subanalysis of the CORE-64 trial. , 2011, Radiology.
[10] M. Salerno,et al. Coronary angiographic evaluation of low-risk chest pain in the emergency department CT-STAT, or maybe not quite that fast? , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[11] D. Berman,et al. The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[12] H. White,et al. 2011 Addendum to the National Heart Foundation of Australia/Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) 2006. , 2011, Heart, lung & circulation.
[13] M. Feneley,et al. Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: current clinical applications: Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand guidelines. , 2011, Heart, lung & circulation.
[14] Paul A Scuffham,et al. Cost-effectiveness of coronary computed tomography and cardiac stress imaging in the emergency department: a decision analytic model comparing diagnostic strategies for chest pain in patients at low risk of acute coronary syndromes. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[15] M. Hansen,et al. The value of dual-source 64-slice CT coronary angiography in the assessment of patients presenting to an acute chest pain service. , 2010, Heart, lung & circulation.
[16] G. Feuchtner,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience , 2009, European Radiology.
[17] L. Mitsumori,et al. Low-risk patients with chest pain in the emergency department: negative 64-MDCT coronary angiography may reduce length of stay and hospital charges. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[18] M. Budoff,et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Indi , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[19] W. B. Meijboom,et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in women versus men with angina pectoris. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.
[20] A. Tonkin,et al. Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes 2006 , 2006, The Medical journal of Australia.
[21] S. Dixon,et al. Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a chest pain observation unit compared with routine care , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[22] C. Aroney,et al. Use of an accelerated chest pain assessment protocol in patients at intermediate risk of adverse cardiac events , 2003, The Medical journal of Australia.
[23] Joseph S Alpert,et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[24] Felix Zijlstra,et al. Clinical value of 12-lead electrocardiogram after successful reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction , 1997, The Lancet.
[25] R. Detrano,et al. Exercise-induced ST depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis. , 1989, Circulation.
[26] Fan Wang,et al. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2016 .
[27] M. Hansen,et al. Temporal Trends in Cardiac CT Radiation Exposure and the Impact of the PROTECTION Trials , 2012 .
[28] N. Wolfe. Coronary artery stenoses:accuracy of 64-detector row CT angiography in segments with mild,moderate,or severe calcification——a subanalysis of the CORE-64 trial , 2011 .
[29] E. Antman,et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). , 2002, Circulation.
[30] M. Brennan,et al. Follow-up [2] , 1992 .