Diagnostic performance and cost of CT angiography versus stress ECG--a randomized prospective study of suspected acute coronary syndrome chest pain in the emergency department (CT-COMPARE).

[1]  J. Deckers,et al.  Is it cost-effective to use a test to decide which individuals with an intermediate cardiovascular disease risk would benefit from statin treatment? , 2014, International journal of cardiology.

[2]  J. Younger,et al.  The approach to patients with possible cardiac chest pain , 2013, The Medical journal of Australia.

[3]  T. Villines,et al.  Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  J. Fleg,et al.  Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  C. Reid,et al.  2-Hour accelerated diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms using contemporary troponins as the only biomarker: the ADAPT trial. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Janet M. Busey,et al.  Economic outcome of cardiac CT-based evaluation and standard of care for suspected acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department: a decision analytic model. , 2012, Academic radiology.

[8]  N. Paul,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography according to pre-test probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary arterial calcification. The CORE-64 (Coronary Artery Evaluation Using 64-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography) International Multicenter , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  J. Lima,et al.  Coronary artery stenoses: accuracy of 64-detector row CT angiography in segments with mild, moderate, or severe calcification--a subanalysis of the CORE-64 trial. , 2011, Radiology.

[10]  M. Salerno,et al.  Coronary angiographic evaluation of low-risk chest pain in the emergency department CT-STAT, or maybe not quite that fast? , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  D. Berman,et al.  The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  H. White,et al.  2011 Addendum to the National Heart Foundation of Australia/Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) 2006. , 2011, Heart, lung & circulation.

[13]  M. Feneley,et al.  Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: current clinical applications: Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand guidelines. , 2011, Heart, lung & circulation.

[14]  Paul A Scuffham,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of coronary computed tomography and cardiac stress imaging in the emergency department: a decision analytic model comparing diagnostic strategies for chest pain in patients at low risk of acute coronary syndromes. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[15]  M. Hansen,et al.  The value of dual-source 64-slice CT coronary angiography in the assessment of patients presenting to an acute chest pain service. , 2010, Heart, lung & circulation.

[16]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience , 2009, European Radiology.

[17]  L. Mitsumori,et al.  Low-risk patients with chest pain in the emergency department: negative 64-MDCT coronary angiography may reduce length of stay and hospital charges. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  M. Budoff,et al.  Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Indi , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  W. B. Meijboom,et al.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in women versus men with angina pectoris. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  A. Tonkin,et al.  Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes 2006 , 2006, The Medical journal of Australia.

[21]  S. Dixon,et al.  Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a chest pain observation unit compared with routine care , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  C. Aroney,et al.  Use of an accelerated chest pain assessment protocol in patients at intermediate risk of adverse cardiac events , 2003, The Medical journal of Australia.

[23]  Joseph S Alpert,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  Felix Zijlstra,et al.  Clinical value of 12-lead electrocardiogram after successful reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction , 1997, The Lancet.

[25]  R. Detrano,et al.  Exercise-induced ST depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis. , 1989, Circulation.

[26]  Fan Wang,et al.  A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2016 .

[27]  M. Hansen,et al.  Temporal Trends in Cardiac CT Radiation Exposure and the Impact of the PROTECTION Trials , 2012 .

[28]  N. Wolfe Coronary artery stenoses:accuracy of 64-detector row CT angiography in segments with mild,moderate,or severe calcification——a subanalysis of the CORE-64 trial , 2011 .

[29]  E. Antman,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). , 2002, Circulation.

[30]  M. Brennan,et al.  Follow-up [2] , 1992 .