Towards a standardized system for the reporting of carbon benefits in sustainable land management projects.

Given the fact that human activities currently emit greenhouse gases (GHG) equivalent to over 50 billion tonnes of CO 2 /year and that approximately 30 percent come from land use and land-use change, natural resource management (NRM) and sustainable land management (SLM) activities could have a large role to play in climate change mitigation. The types of land management activities covered by such projects vary widely. These activities have different carbon (C) and GHG impacts. Reports of changes in C and GHG emissions for land management projects are required for a variety of reasons and vary depending on the purpose of the project. Land management projects can be divided into two categories: (i) those that are carried out specifically for climate change mitigation; and (ii) those that are not, but still have some impact on GHG flux and require some level of C reporting. Mitigation projects are usually required to use inventory methods accepted by a certification scheme or other regulating body. As the interest in climate change mitigation has grown, so has the interest in reporting C changes and GHG mitigation for projects that are primarily SLM projects rather than C mitigation projects. For these types of projects, C reporting will be different, depending on the resources available and the motivation for doing the report. The Global Environment Facility (GEF) provides incremental financing to a wide range of SLM activities to ensure they can deliver global environmental benefits. These activities take place in developing countries and range from reforestation and agroforestry projects, to projects that protect wetlands

[1]  S. Ogle,et al.  Counting carbon on the farm: Reaping the benefits of carbon offset programs , 2009, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[2]  E. Gabathuler,et al.  Benefits of sustainable land management , 2009 .

[3]  Yuanying Peng,et al.  Forest management and soil respiration: Implications for carbon sequestration , 2008 .

[4]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  Carbon Inventory Methods : Chinese translation of the English language edition: Carbon Inventory Methods – handbook for greenhouse gas inventory, carbon mitigation and roundwood production projects , 2007 .

[5]  C. Cerri,et al.  Soil carbon stocks at regional scales , 2007 .

[6]  Martial Bernoux,et al.  National and sub-national assessments of soil organic carbon stocks and changes: The GEFSOC modelling system , 2007 .

[7]  Martial Bernoux,et al.  The GEFSOC soil carbon modelling system: A tool for conducting regional-scale soil carbon inventories and assessing the impacts of land use change on soil carbon , 2007 .

[8]  M. Saier,et al.  Climate Change, 2007 , 2007 .

[9]  P. Doraiswamy,et al.  Carbon Sequestration and Land Degradation , 2007 .

[10]  J. Goldammer Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005 – Thematic report on forest fires in the Central Asian Region and adjacent countries / FAO Fire Management Working Paper 16 , 2006 .

[11]  Balkan Region,et al.  Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005 - Report on fires in the , 2006 .

[12]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .

[13]  H. Keulen (Tropical) soil organic matter modelling: problems and prospects , 2001, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[14]  G. Nabuurs,et al.  LUCF sector good practice guidance , 2003 .

[15]  F. Wagner,et al.  Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry , 2003 .

[16]  Götz Schroth,et al.  Conversion of secondary forest into agroforestry and monoculture plantations in Amazonia: consequences for biomass, litter and soil carbon stocks after 7 years , 2002 .

[17]  K. Paustian,et al.  GRASSLAND MANAGEMENT AND CONVERSION INTO GRASSLAND: EFFECTS ON SOIL CARBON , 2001 .

[18]  Unfccc Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1997 .

[19]  L. R. Oldeman The Global Extent of Soil Degradation , 1992 .

[20]  Gu Lb,et al.  Soil carbon stocks and land use change : a meta analysis , 2022 .