Exposure of occupations to technologies of the fourth industrial revolution

The fourth industrial revolution (4IR) is likely to have a substantial impact on the economy. Companies need to build up capabilities to implement new technologies, and automation may make some occupations obsolete. However, where, when, and how the change will happen remain to be determined. Robust empirical indicators of technological progress linked to occupations can help to illuminate this change. With this aim, we provide such an indicator based on patent data. Using natural language processing, we calculate patent exposure scores for more than 900 occupations, which represent the technological progress related to them. To provide a lens on the impact of the 4IR, we differentiate between traditional and 4IR patent exposure. Our method differs from previous approaches in that it both accounts for the diversity of task-level patent exposures within an occupation and reflects work activities more accurately. We find that exposure to 4IR patents differs from traditional patent exposure. Manual tasks, and accordingly occupations such as construction and production, are exposed mainly to traditional (non-4IR) patents but have low exposure to 4IR patents. The analysis suggests that 4IR technologies may have a negative impact on job growth; this impact appears 10 to 20 years after patent filing. Researchers could validate our findings through further analyses with micro data, and our dataset can serve as a source for more complex labor market analyses. Further, we compared the 4IR exposure to other automation and AI exposure scores. Whereas many measures refer to theoretical automation potential, our patent-based indicator reflects actual technology diffusion. We show that a combination of 4IR exposure with other automation measures may provide additional insights. For example, near-term automation might be driven by non-4IR technologies. Our work not only allows analyses of the impact of 4IR technologies as a whole, but also provides exposure scores for more than 300 technology fields, such as AI and smart office technologies. Finally, the work provides a general mapping of patents to tasks and occupations, which enables future researchers to construct individual exposure measures.

[1]  José Lobo,et al.  Identifying the sources of technological novelty in the process of invention , 2015 .

[2]  Kagermann Henning Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0 , 2013 .

[3]  Iyad Rahwan,et al.  Toward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on labor , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Joel Mokyr,et al.  The history of technological anxiety and the future of economic growth: Is this time different? , 2015 .

[5]  Antoine Dechezleprêtre,et al.  Automating Labor: Evidence from Firm-Level Patent Data , 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[6]  David H. Autor,et al.  Replication data for: Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation , 2019 .

[7]  Daron Acemoglu,et al.  Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor , 2019, Journal of Economic Perspectives.

[8]  Michael Webb,et al.  The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Labor Market , 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[9]  Jacques Guyot,et al.  Automated Patent Classification , 2011, Current Challenges in Patent Information Retrieval.

[10]  Joana Mendonça,et al.  Mapping Industry 4.0 Technologies: From Cyber-Physical Systems to Artificial Intelligence , 2021, ArXiv.

[11]  David Autor,et al.  The Growth of Low Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the U.S. Labor Market , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[12]  B. Kelly,et al.  Measuring Technological Innovation Over the Long Run , 2018 .

[13]  James Bessen Automation and Jobs: When Technology Boosts Employment , 2019, Economic Policy.

[14]  Klaus f. Zimmerman Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics , 2020 .

[15]  Robert C. Seamans,et al.  Occupational, industry, and geographic exposure to artificial intelligence: A novel dataset and its potential uses , 2021, Strategic Management Journal.

[16]  David Autor,et al.  Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings , 2010 .

[17]  Michael A. Osborne,et al.  The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? , 2017 .

[18]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  What can machine learning do? Workforce implications , 2017, Science.

[19]  Anna Salomons,et al.  Racing With or Against the Machine? Evidence from Europe , 2016, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  L. Kogan,et al.  Technological Change and Occupations over the Long Run , 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[21]  Travis J. Lybbert,et al.  Getting Patents and Economic Data to Speak to Each Other: An 'Algorithmic Links with Probabilities' Approach for Joint Analyses of Patenting and Economic Activity , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[22]  Jorge Rodríguez Menés,et al.  Upgrading or Polarization? Occupational Change in Britain, Germany, Spain and Switzerland, 1990-2008 , 2010 .

[23]  Brian S. Silverman,et al.  Technological Resources and the Logic of Corporate Diversification , 2002 .

[24]  Tom Michael Mitchell,et al.  Track how technology is transforming work , 2017, Nature.

[25]  Daron Acemoglu,et al.  AI and Jobs: Evidence from Online Vacancies , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[26]  Ralf Krestel,et al.  Domain-specific word embeddings for patent classification , 2019, Data Technol. Appl..

[27]  John Tait,et al.  Current Challenges in Patent Information Retrieval , 2011, The Information Retrieval Series.

[28]  Melanie Arntz,et al.  Digitalization and the Future of Work: Macroeconomic Consequences , 2019, Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics.

[29]  D. Acemoglu,et al.  Demographics and Automation , 2018, The Review of Economic Studies.

[30]  Lucas Santos Dalenogare,et al.  Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies , 2019, International Journal of Production Economics.

[31]  Joana Mendonça,et al.  The four smarts of Industry 4.0: Evolution of ten years of research and future perspectives , 2021, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[32]  Katja Mann,et al.  Benign Effects of Automation: New Evidence from Patent Texts , 2018, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[33]  Tomas Mikolov,et al.  Advances in Pre-Training Distributed Word Representations , 2017, LREC.

[34]  Lawrence F. Katz,et al.  The Polarization of the U.S. Labor Market , 2006 .

[35]  M. Arntz,et al.  Revisiting the risk of automation , 2017 .

[36]  Jacques Bughin,et al.  A future that works: automation, employment, and productivity , 2017 .