Lightning subsequent-stroke electric field peak greater than the first stroke peak and multiple ground terminations

For 46 multiple-stroke flashes in which each stroke ground termination was located using a TV camera network and thunder ranging, 15 flashes (33%) had one or more subsequent return strokes whose initial electric field peak normalized to 100 km was greater than the first-stroke field peak of the flash. In 9 of these 15 flashes the subsequent strokes with field peaks greater than the first stroke followed the same channel as the first stroke; in five flashes the subsequent strokes with the greater peaks followed a different channel to ground; and in one flash the subsequent strokes with the greater peaks occurred both in the first-stroke channel and in a different channel. The interstroke intervals immediately preceding the 13 larger subsequent strokes that followed the first-stroke channel had a geometric mean (GM) duration of 98 ms, 1.7 times greater than the GM of 57 ms for all 199 interstroke intervals (46 flashes) without any selection. Eight of the 13 larger subsequent strokes for which leader durations were measurable had a GM leader duration of 0.55 ms, 3.3 times smaller than the GM of 1.8 ms for 117 subsequent leaders with measurable duration in a previously formed channel of the 46 multiple-stroke flashes. For the six larger subsequent strokes that created a new channel to ground, the preceding interstroke interval had a GM of 130 ms, and the leader duration had a GM of 15 ms. No subsequent stroke with peak field exceeding the first in any category had a preceding interstroke interval less than 35 ms. Analysis of direct current measurements from Switzerland shows that subsequent-stroke currents exhibit many features similar to those of Florida subsequent-stroke electric fields. In 22 Florida single-stroke and multiple-stroke ground flashes the distances between multiple channel terminations in a given flash (33 measurements) ranged from 0.3 km to 7.3 km, with a GM of 1.7 km.

[1]  Vladimir A. Rakov,et al.  K and M changes in close lightning ground flashes in Florida , 1990 .

[2]  Martin A. Uman,et al.  Horizontal electric fields from lightning return strokes , 1988 .

[3]  E. Philip Krider,et al.  The optical and radiation field signatures produced by lightning return strokes , 1982 .

[4]  Martin A. Uman,et al.  Continuing current in negative cloud‐to‐ground lightning , 1989 .

[5]  Vladimir A. Rakov,et al.  Some properties of negative cloud‐to‐ground lightning flashes versus stroke order , 1990 .

[6]  Mat Darveniza,et al.  Lightning Induced Voltages on Power Lines: Experiment , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[7]  Vladimir A. Rakov,et al.  Long continuing current in negative lightning ground flashes , 1990 .

[8]  J. R. Grant,et al.  Characterization of Lightning Return Stroke Electric and Magnetic Fields From Simultaneous Two- Station Measurements (Paper 9C0949) , 1979 .

[9]  Martin A. Uman,et al.  Speed and current for lightning stepped leaders near ground as determined from electric field records , 1985 .

[10]  Vladimir A. Rakov,et al.  Waveforms of first and subsequent leaders in negative lightning flashes , 1990 .

[11]  Martin A. Uman,et al.  Some features of stroke occurrence in Florida lightning flashes , 1984 .

[12]  Martin A. Uman,et al.  Electric fields preceding cloud‐to‐ground lightning flashes , 1982 .

[13]  K. Berger,et al.  Novel observations on lightning discharges: Results of research on Mount San Salvatore , 1967 .

[14]  Anil Chanana Lightning Performance of Transmission Lines , 1990 .

[15]  Vladimir A. Rakov,et al.  Observed dart leader speed in natural and triggered lightning , 1992 .

[16]  R. H. Golde Lightning and tall structures , 1978 .