Model predictive control for wastewater treatment process with feedforward compensation

Being an optimizing technology, model predictive control (MPC) can now be found in a wide variety of application fields. The main and most obvious control goal to be achieved in a wastewater treatment plant is to fulfill the effluent quality standards, while minimizing the operational costs. In order to maintain the effluent quality within regulation-specified limits, the MPC strategy has been applied to the Benchmark Simulation Model 1 (BSM1) simulation benchmark of wastewater treatment process. After the discussion of open loop responses of outputs to manipulated inputs and measured influent disturbances, the strategies of feedback by linear dynamic matrix control (DMC), quadratic dynamic matrix control (QDMC) and nonlinear model predictive control (NLMPC), and improvement by feedforward based on influent flow rate or ammonium concentration have been investigated. The simulation results indicate that good performance was achieved under steady influent characteristics, especially concerning the nitrogen-related species. Compared to DMC and QDMC, NLMPC with penalty function brings little improvement. Two measured disturbances have been used for feedforward control, the influent flow rate and ammonium concentration. It is shown that the performance of feedforward with respect to the influent ammonium concentration is much higher than for the feedforward with respect to the influent flow rate. However, this latter is slightly better than the DMC feedback. The best performance is obtained by combining both feedforward controllers with respect to the influent ammonium concentration and flow rate. In all cases, the improvement of performance is correlated with more aeration energy consumption.

[1]  Michael A. Henson,et al.  Model predictive control of continuous yeast bioreactors using cell population balance models , 2000 .

[2]  Thomas J. McAvoy,et al.  Control of an alternating aerobic–anoxic activated sludge system — Part 1: development of a linearization-based modeling approach , 2000 .

[3]  K. Schittkowski NLPQL: A fortran subroutine solving constrained nonlinear programming problems , 1986 .

[4]  K. Konarczak,et al.  Hierarchical predictive control of integrated wastewater treatment systems , 2008 .

[5]  S Marsili-Libelli,et al.  Fuzzy predictive control for nitrogen removal in biological wastewater treatment. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[6]  J. Richalet,et al.  Model predictive heuristic control: Applications to industrial processes , 1978, Autom..

[7]  N Hvala,et al.  Comparison of control strategies for nitrogen removal in an activated sludge process in terms of operating costs: a simulation study. , 2007, Water research.

[8]  B Carlsson,et al.  Control of an activated sludge process with nitrogen removal--a benchmark study. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[9]  K. Gernaey,et al.  Benchmarking combined biological phosphorus and nitrogen removal wastewater treatment processes , 2004 .

[10]  C. R. Cutler,et al.  Dynamic matrix control¿A computer control algorithm , 1979 .

[11]  Paul Lant,et al.  Multivariable control of nutrient-removing activated sludge systems , 1999 .

[12]  Bengt Carlsson,et al.  Nonlinear and set-point control of the dissolved oxygen concentration in an activated sludge process , 1996 .

[13]  S. Isaacs,et al.  An analysis of nitrogen removal and control strategies in an alternating activated sludge process , 1995 .

[14]  J. Kocijan,et al.  Wastewater treatment benchmark: what can be achieved with simple control? , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[15]  I. Takács A dynamic model of the clarification-thickening process , 1991 .

[16]  B. Holenda,et al.  Dissolved oxygen control of the activated sludge wastewater treatment process using model predictive control , 2008, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[17]  T. McAvoy,et al.  Control of an alternating aerobic–anoxic activated sludge system — Part 2: optimization using a linearized model , 2000 .

[18]  Benoît Chachuat,et al.  Optimal aeration control of industrial alternating activated sludge plants , 2005 .

[19]  Jean-François Béteau,et al.  Multicriteria control strategy for cost/quality compromise in Wastewater Treatment Plants , 2004 .

[20]  J. Corriou,et al.  Estimation of a Reduced Model of the BSM1 Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment Plant , 2008 .

[21]  M. N. Pons,et al.  Benchmark for evaluating control strategies in wastewater treatment plants , 1999, 1999 European Control Conference (ECC).

[22]  K. Ezra Kwok,et al.  Predictive modeling and loose-loop control for perfusion bioreactors , 2001 .

[23]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  Towards a benchmark for evaluating control strategies in wastewater treatment plants by simulation , 1999 .

[24]  Carlos E. Garcia,et al.  QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING SOLUTION OF DYNAMIC MATRIX CONTROL (QDMC) , 1986 .

[25]  Mietek A. Brdys,et al.  Dissolved oxygen control for activated sludge processes , 2005, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[26]  P Grau,et al.  Supervisory control strategies for the new WWTP of Galindo-Bilbao: the long run from the conceptual design to the full-scale experimental validation. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[27]  J. Keller,et al.  Integrated control of nitrate recirculation and external carbon addition in a predenitrification system. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[28]  J. Corriou Process Control: Theory and Applications , 2010 .

[29]  Bengt Carlsson,et al.  Iterative design of a nitrate controller using an external carbon source in an activated sludge process , 1998 .

[30]  Yucai Zhu,et al.  Multivariable System Identification For Process Control , 2001 .

[31]  Sylvie Gillot,et al.  The COST Simulation Benchmark: Description and Simulator Manual , 2001 .

[32]  Jan M. Maciejowski,et al.  Predictive control : with constraints , 2002 .

[33]  Adrian Oehmen,et al.  Control of nitrate ricirculation flow in predenitrification systems. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[34]  Ronald Soeterboek,et al.  Predictive Control: A Unified Approach , 1992 .

[35]  N Hvala,et al.  Feedforward-feedback control of an activated sludge process: a simulation study. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.