EVOLUTION OF GENETIC ARCHITECTURE UNDER DIRECTIONAL SELECTION

Abstract We investigate the multilinear epistatic model under mutation‐limited directional selection. We confirm previous results that only directional epistasis, in which genes on average reinforce or diminish each other's effects, contribute to the initial evolution of mutational effects. Thus, either canalization or decanalization can occur under directional selection, depending on whether positive or negative epistasis is prevalent. We then focus on the evolution of the epistatic coefficients themselves. In the absence of higher‐order epistasis, positive pairwise epistasis will tend to weaken relative to additive effects, while negative pairwise epistasis will tend to become strengthened. Positive third‐order epistasis will counteract these effects, while negative third‐order epistasis will reinforce them. More generally, gene interactions of all orders have an inherent tendency for negative changes under directional selection, which can only be modified by higher‐order directional epistasis. We identify three types of nonadditive quasi‐equilibrium architectures that, although not strictly stable, can be maintained for an extended time: (1) nondirectional epistatic architectures; (2) canalized architectures with strong epistasis; and (3) near‐additive architectures in which additive effects keep increasing relative to epistasis.

[1]  A. Wagner Robustness and Evolvability in Living Systems , 2005 .

[2]  G. Wagner,et al.  Epistasis and the mutation load: a measurement-theoretical approach. , 2001, Genetics.

[3]  M. Pigliucci Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes , 2003 .

[4]  C. Ofria,et al.  EVOLUTION AND DETECTION OF GENETIC ROBUSTNESS , 2003 .

[5]  G. Wagner,et al.  Epistasis in Polygenic Traits and the Evolution of Genetic Architecture under Stabilizing Selection , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[6]  T. F. Hansen The Evolution of Genetic Architecture , 2006 .

[7]  Kristen K. Dang,et al.  Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks , 2006, Nature.

[8]  A. Bergman,et al.  Evolutionary capacitance as a general feature of complex gene networks , 2003, Nature.

[9]  A. Bergman,et al.  Waddington's canalization revisited: Developmental stability and evolution , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  EPISTASIS BETWEEN NEW MUTATIONS AND GENETIC BACKGROUND AND A TEST OF GENETIC CANALIZATION , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  R. Lande NATURAL SELECTION AND RANDOM GENETIC DRIFT IN PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION , 1976, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  M. Feldman,et al.  On the evolution of epistasis I: diploids under selection. , 2005, Theoretical population biology.

[13]  Günter P. Wagner,et al.  Complex Adaptations and the Evolution of Evolvability , 2005 .

[14]  S. Gould The Structure of Evolutionary Theory , 2002 .

[15]  G. Wagner,et al.  Modeling genetic architecture: a multilinear theory of gene interaction. , 2001, Theoretical population biology.

[16]  I. Dworkin Canalization, Cryptic Variation, and Developmental Buffering: A Critical Examination and Analytical Perspective , 2005 .

[17]  D. Layzer A macroscopic approach to population genetics. , 1978, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  R. Buerger The Mathematical Theory of Selection, Recombination, and Mutation , 2000 .

[19]  S. Rice,et al.  A general population genetic theory for the evolution of developmental interactions , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  W. Scharloo,et al.  Canalization: Genetic and Developmental Aspects , 1991 .

[21]  G. Williams,et al.  Natural selection : domains, levels, and challenges. , 1994 .

[22]  A. Hendry,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: THE PACE OF MODERN LIFE: MEASURING RATES OF CONTEMPORARY MICROEVOLUTION , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  A. Bradshaw The Croonian Lecture, 1991. Genostasis and the limits to evolution. , 1991, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[24]  D. Layzer,et al.  Genetic Variation and Progressive Evolution , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[25]  G. Wagner,et al.  A POPULATION GENETIC THEORY OF CANALIZATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  Günter P. Wagner,et al.  Genetic measurement theory of epistatic effects , 2004, Genetica.

[27]  G. Wagner,et al.  The Population Genetic Theory of Hidden Variation and Genetic Robustness , 2004, Genetics.

[28]  Patrick C Phillips,et al.  The Opportunity for Canalization and the Evolution of Genetic Networks , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[29]  J. Cheverud,et al.  Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.

[30]  T. Flatt The Evolutionary Genetics of Canalization , 2005, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[31]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[32]  B. Crespi,et al.  The evolution of maladaptation , 2000, Heredity.

[33]  L. Altenberg,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: COMPLEX ADAPTATIONS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EVOLVABILITY , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  Gabriel Moreno GENETIC ARCHITECTURE, GENETIC BEHAVIOR, AND CHARACTER EVOLUTION , 1994 .

[35]  R. Dawkins Climbing Mount Improbable , 1996 .

[36]  A. Hastings,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE‐GENETIC MODEL FOR SELECTION ON DEVELOPMENTAL NOISE , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  Richard A. Watson,et al.  PERSPECTIVE:SIGN EPISTASIS AND GENETIC CONSTRAINT ON EVOLUTIONARY TRAJECTORIES , 2005 .

[38]  G. Wagner,et al.  EVOLUTION AND DETECTION OF GENETIC ROBUSTNESS , 2003 .

[39]  S. Rice THE EVOLUTION OF CANALIZATION AND THE BREAKING OF VON BAER'S LAWS: MODELING THE EVOLUTION OF DEVELOPMENT WITH EPISTASIS , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[40]  C. Cockerham,et al.  Evolution and maintenance of quantitative genetic variation by mutations. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Garth A. Gibson,et al.  Canalization in evolutionary genetics: a stabilizing theory? , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[42]  T. Kawecki,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF GENETIC CANALIZATION UNDER FLUCTUATING SELECTION , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[43]  C. Wilke,et al.  Interaction between directional epistasis and average mutational effects , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  Toby Johnson,et al.  Theoretical models of selection and mutation on quantitative traits , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  C. Waddington,et al.  The strategy of the genes , 1957 .

[46]  Joachim Hermisson,et al.  The role of epistatic gene interactions in the response to selection and the evolution of evolvability. , 2005, Theoretical population biology.

[47]  EFFECTS OF GENETIC DRIFT ON VARIANCE COMPONENTS UNDER A GENERAL MODEL OF EPISTASIS , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[48]  M. Wade,et al.  Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process , 2000 .

[49]  G. Wagner HOMOLOGUES, NATURAL KINDS AND THE EVOLUTION OF MODULARITY , 1996 .

[50]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  Evolvability, stabilizing selection, and the problem of stasis , 2004 .

[51]  A. Wagner DOES EVOLUTIONARY PLASTICITY EVOLVE? , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[52]  C. Waddington Canalization of Development and the Inheritance of Acquired Characters , 1942, Nature.

[53]  C. Ofria,et al.  Sexual reproduction reshapes the genetic architecture of digital organisms , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.