Estimation of Crystal Timing Properties and Efficiencies for the Improvement of (Joint) Maximum-Likelihood Reconstructions in TOF-PET

With increasing improvements in the time of flight (TOF) resolution of positron emission tomography (PET) scanners, an accurate model of the TOF measurements is becoming increasingly important. This work considers two parameters of the TOF kernel; the relative positioning of the timing data-bins and the timing resolution along each line of response (LOR). Similar to an existing data-driven method, we assume that any shifts of data-bins along lines of response can be modelled as differences between crystal timing offsets. Inspired by this, timing resolutions of all LORs are modelled as the hypotenuse of timing resolutions of the crystal-pairs in coincidence. Furthermore, in order to mitigate the influence of potential inaccuracies of detector-pair sensitivities on crystal timing resolutions, relative LOR sensitivities are modelled as the product of efficiency factors for the two crystals in coincidence. We validate estimating maps of crystal timing offsets, timing resolutions and efficiencies from the emission data using noisy simulations of a brain phantom. Results are shown for phantom and patient data scanned on clinically available TOF-PET scanners. We find that the estimation of crystal timing resolutions is more sensitive to the data statistics than the estimation of crystal timing offsets. As a result, estimation of crystal timing properties could either be limited to high count emission data, or be obtained utilizing additional regularizations on the estimates. Using a more accurate model of the TOF acquisition, improvements are observed in standard activity reconstructions as well as joint reconstructions of activity and attenuation.

[1]  J. Uribe,et al.  Studies of a Next-Generation Silicon-Photomultiplier–Based Time-of-Flight PET/CT System , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  G. Muehllehner,et al.  Time of flight coincidence timing calibration techniques using radioactive sources , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[3]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  Time-of-flight PET time calibration using data consistency , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  M. Daube-Witherspoon,et al.  Influence of Time-of-Flight Kernel Accuracy in TOF-PET Reconstruction , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[5]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  Data driven time alignment for TOF-PET , 2017, 2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[6]  D. Townsend,et al.  Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  M. Conti Why is TOF PET reconstruction a more robust method in the presence of inconsistent data? , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Estimation of crystal timings in TOF-PET , 2018, 2018 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Proceedings (NSS/MIC).

[9]  Vladimir Y. Panin Simultaneous activity and crystal efficiencies reconstruction for continuous motion bed acquisition , 2016, 2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/RTSD).

[10]  R. Badawi,et al.  Self-normalisation of emission data in 3D-PET , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[11]  Paul Marsden,et al.  Self-normalisation of emission data in 3D-PET , 1998 .

[12]  Gaspar Delso,et al.  Design Features and Mutual Compatibility Studies of the Time-of-Flight PET Capable GE SIGNA PET/MR System , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  V. Y. Panin,et al.  Simultaneous activity and crystal efficiencies reconstruction: TOF patient-based detector Quality Control , 2014, 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[14]  M.E. Casey,et al.  A central positron source to perform the timing alignment of detectors in a PET scanner , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[15]  M. Defrise,et al.  Time-of-flight PET data determine the attenuation sinogram up to a constant , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  The Validation Problem of Joint Emission/Transmission Reconstruction From TOF-PET Projections , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[17]  J. S. Karp,et al.  Recent developments in time-of-flight PET , 2016, EJNMMI Physics.

[18]  Evaluation of a self-normalization method for two PET cameras using prompt, delay or total emission data , 2014, 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[19]  Magnus Dahlbom,et al.  Evaluation of the ECAT EXCAT HR with ACSII for clinical routine 3D measurements , 1995, 1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record.

[20]  Yun Dong,et al.  A Systematic Study on Factors Influencing the Accuracy of MLAA , 2017, 2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[21]  Vladimir Panin,et al.  Time alignment of time of flight positron emission tomography using the background activity of LSO , 2013, 2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (2013 NSS/MIC).

[22]  René M. Botnar,et al.  A Self-Normalization Reconstruction Technique for PET Scans Using the Positron Emission Data , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  A Quantitative Evaluation of Joint Activity and Attenuation Reconstruction in TOF PET/MR Brain Imaging , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  Kathleen Vunckx,et al.  Fisher information-based evaluation of image quality for time-of-flight PET , 2010, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[25]  Yusheng Li,et al.  Attenuation correction in emission tomography using the emission data--A review. , 2016, Medical physics.

[26]  J S Karp,et al.  TOF PET offset calibration from clinical data , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  A. Reilhac,et al.  PET-SORTEO: validation and development of database of Simulated PET volumes , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.