Measuring Congruence of Ranking Results Applying Particular MCDM Methods

The aim of the current research is to measure objective congruence (incongruence) of the results obtained in a process of multiple criteria analysis when applying different MCDM methods. The methodology for evaluation of ranking results is developed on the ground of a case study of the redevelopment of derelict buildings as well as on composed experimental tasks. Fuzzified COPRAS, TOPSIS and VIKOR methods are applied for ranking the alternatives. Calculation results are evaluated by applying mathematical statistics methods. A methodology for measuring the congruence (incongruence) of the relative significances of alternatives is proposed.

[1]  Romualdas Ginevičius,et al.  The model of forming competitive strategy of an enterprise under the conditions of oligopolic market , 2010 .

[2]  Peide Liu,et al.  Multi‐attribute decision‐making method research based on interval vague set and TOPSIS method , 2009 .

[3]  Bindu Madhuri,et al.  Selection of Best Web Site by Applying COPRAS-G method , 2010 .

[4]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRAS , 2011 .

[5]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multicriteria evaluation of apartment blocks maintenance contractors: Lithuanian case study , 2009 .

[7]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Modeling subjective evaluation for fuzzy group multicriteria decision making , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Siba Sankar Mahapatra,et al.  Multicriteria decision-making models for the evaluation and appraisal of teachers' performance , 2010 .

[9]  Morteza Pakdin Amiri,et al.  Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Andrius Kučas,et al.  Location prioritization by means of multicriteria spatial decision‐support systems: A case study of forest fragmentation‐based ranking of forest administrative areas , 2010 .

[11]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods , 2011 .

[12]  D. Nagesh Kumar,et al.  Multicriterion Analysis in Engineering and Management , 2010 .

[13]  S. Farid Mousavi,et al.  TQM consultant selection in SMEs with TOPSIS under fuzzy environment , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Model by Applying Grey Numbers , 2009, Informatica.

[15]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study , 2000 .

[16]  Fei Ye,et al.  An extended TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers for virtual enterprise partner selection , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Diyar Akay,et al.  A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  Etienne E. Kerre,et al.  Defuzzification: criteria and classification , 1999, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[19]  Karel Skokan.  Technological and Economic Development of Economy , 2011 .

[20]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  Modelling multidimensional redevelopment of derelict buildings , 2008 .

[21]  Marius Jakimavičius,et al.  A GIS and multi‐criteria‐based analysisand rankingof transportation zonesof Vilniuscity , 2009 .

[22]  Romualdas Ginevičius,et al.  Selection of the optimal real estate investment project basing on multiple criteria evaluation using stochastic dimensions , 2009 .

[23]  Yusuf Tansel Iç,et al.  Development of a quick credibility scoring decision support system using fuzzy TOPSIS , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  Jurgita Antuchevičienė.  PRINCIPLES OF REVITALISATION OF DERELICT RURAL BUILDINGS , 2003 .

[25]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  Multiple criteria evaluation of rural building's regeneration alternatives , 2007 .

[26]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Multiple criteria construction management decisions considering relations between criteria , 2010 .

[27]  Andrew J. Higgins,et al.  A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Leonas Ustinovičius,et al.  Evaluation of Construction Process Safety Solutions Using the TOPSIS Method , 2009 .

[29]  C. Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making: Methods And Applications , 1996 .

[30]  V. Podvezko,et al.  Evaluating the changes in economic and social development of Lithuanian counties by multiple criteria methods , 2009 .

[31]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  Complex evaluation of contracts for construction , 2010 .

[32]  Mohamed Marzouk.  A superiority and inferiority ranking model for contractor selection , 2008 .

[33]  Ching-Hui Chang,et al.  Domestic open-end equity mutual fund performance evaluation using extended TOPSIS method with different distance approaches , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[34]  Serafim Opricovic,et al.  A Fuzzy Compromise Solution for multicriteria Problems , 2007, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[35]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  Evaluation of Ranking Accuracy in Multi-Criteria Decisions , 2006, Informatica.

[36]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[37]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[38]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  The concept of the ideal indoor environment in multi-attribute assessment of dwelling-houses , 2011 .

[39]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Development of an indicator model and ranking of sustainable revitalization alternatives of derelict property: a Lithuanian case study , 2006 .

[40]  M. Yurdakul,et al.  Analysis of the benefit generated by using fuzzy numbers in a TOPSIS model developed for machine tool selection problems , 2009 .