Introducing & Evaluating ‘Nutrition Facts’ for Online Content

So-called ‘fake news’ – deceptive online content that attempts to manipulate readers – is a growing problem. It has been blamed for election interference, public confusion and other issues, both in the United States and beyond. A tool of state intelligence agencies, scammers and marketers alike, deceptive online content is poised to have growing consequences. This problem is made particularly pronounced as younger generations choose social media sources over journalistic ones for their information. This paper considers a prospective solution in the form of providing consumers with ‘nutrition facts’ style information for online content. To this end, it reviews prior work in product labeling and disclaimers, considers several possible approaches to the challenge and the tradeoffs between them.

[1]  Eunsol Choi,et al.  Truth of Varying Shades: Analyzing Language in Fake News and Political Fact-Checking , 2017, EMNLP.

[2]  C. Gaziano,et al.  Measuring the Concept of Credibility , 1986 .

[3]  M. Gershwin,et al.  The history and contemporary challenges of the US Food and Drug Administration. , 2007, Clinical therapeutics.

[4]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The science of fake news , 2018, Science.

[5]  Regina M. Marchi With Facebook, Blogs, and Fake News, Teens Reject Journalistic “Objectivity” , 2012 .

[6]  Sungyong Seo,et al.  CSI: A Hybrid Deep Model for Fake News Detection , 2017, CIKM.

[7]  Suhang Wang,et al.  Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective , 2017, SKDD.

[8]  William Yang Wang “Liar, Liar Pants on Fire”: A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detection , 2017, ACL.

[9]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  Evaluation of algorithms for fake news identification , 2019, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[10]  M. Gentzkow,et al.  Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election , 2017 .

[11]  V. Bakir,et al.  Fake News and The Economy of Emotions , 2018 .

[12]  Fenglong Ma,et al.  Weak Supervision for Fake News Detection via Reinforcement Learning , 2019, AAAI.

[13]  Sung-Un Yang,et al.  Measuring Social Media Credibility: A Study on a Measure of Blog Credibility , 2011 .

[14]  Victoria L. Rubin,et al.  Fake News or Truth? Using Satirical Cues to Detect Potentially Misleading News , 2016 .

[15]  Susan Wiedenbeck,et al.  Measuring Online Trust of Websites: Credibility, Perceived Ease of Use, and Risk , 2005, AMCIS.

[16]  Mykhailo Granik,et al.  Fake news detection using naive Bayes classifier , 2017, 2017 IEEE First Ukraine Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (UKRCON).

[17]  Dietary Supplements: An Advertising Guide for Industry , 2001, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[18]  Philip Meyer,et al.  Defining and Measuring Credibility of Newspapers: Developing an Index , 1988 .

[19]  I. Barkan Industry invites regulation: the passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906. , 1985, American journal of public health.

[20]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  Development of a 'fake news' machine learning classifier and a dataset for its testing , 2019, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[21]  Jeffrey O'Holleran Blood Code: The History and Future of Video Game Censorship , 2010, J. Telecommun. High Technol. Law.

[22]  J. Cunningham History , 2007, The Journal of Hellenic Studies.

[23]  David G. Rand,et al.  Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning , 2019, Cognition.

[24]  Eugenio Tacchini,et al.  Some Like it Hoax: Automated Fake News Detection in Social Networks , 2017, ArXiv.

[25]  Sibel Adali,et al.  This Just In: Fake News Packs a Lot in Title, Uses Simpler, Repetitive Content in Text Body, More Similar to Satire than Real News , 2017, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.

[26]  David G. Rand,et al.  Prior Exposure Increases Perceived Accuracy of Fake News , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  D. Lazer,et al.  Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election , 2019, Science.