MRI of Adenomyosis: Where Are We Today?

[1]  M. Mischi,et al.  Women with combined adenomyosis and endometriosis on MRI have worse IVF/ICSI outcomes compared to adenomyosis and endometriosis alone: A matched retrospective cohort study. , 2022, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[2]  Mazhar Adli,et al.  Adenomyosis pathogenesis: insights from next-generation sequencing , 2021, Human reproduction update.

[3]  M. Porpora,et al.  Sonographic and clinical features of adenomyosis in women in "early" (18-35) and "advanced" (>35) reproductive ages. , 2021, Minerva obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  Hiroshi Kobayashi,et al.  Relationship between magnetic resonance imaging‐based classification of adenomyosis and disease severity , 2021, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[5]  M. Mischi,et al.  Objective measures of adenomyosis on MRI and their diagnostic accuracy—a systematic review & meta‐analysis , 2021, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[6]  G. Centini,et al.  Adenomyosis and infertility: the role of the junctional zone , 2021, Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology.

[7]  K. Isaacson,et al.  A Systematic Review of Adenomyosis: It Is Time to Reassess What We Thought We Knew about the Disease. , 2020, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[8]  L. Giudice,et al.  Adenomyosis: Mechanisms and Pathogenesis , 2020, Seminars in Reproductive Medicine.

[9]  I. Shih,et al.  Pathology and Pathogenesis of Adenomyosis , 2020, Seminars in Reproductive Medicine.

[10]  Hiroshi Kobayashi,et al.  A Classification Proposal for Adenomyosis Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2020, Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation.

[11]  T. Van den Bosch,et al.  Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach. , 2020, Human reproduction update.

[12]  M. Munro.  Classification Systems for Adenomyosis. , 2019, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[13]  T. Tellum,et al.  Noninvasive Diagnosis of Adenomyosis: A Structured Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy in Imaging. , 2019, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[14]  E. Qvigstad,et al.  In Vivo Adenomyosis Tissue Sampling Using a Transvaginal Ultrasound-guided Core Biopsy Technique for Research Purposes: Safety, Feasibility, and Effectiveness. , 2019, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[15]  Anita Ankola,et al.  Transvaginal US of Endometriosis: Looking Beyond the Endometrioma with a Dedicated Protocol. , 2019, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[16]  J. Dormagen,et al.  Diagnosing adenomyosis with MRI: a prospective study revisiting the junctional zone thickness cutoff of 12 mm as a diagnostic marker , 2019, European Radiology.

[17]  T. Bourne,et al.  Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis , 2019, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[18]  F. Petraglia,et al.  Recent advances in understanding and managing adenomyosis , 2019, F1000Research.

[19]  L. Fellah,et al.  What if deep endometriotic nodules and uterine adenomyosis were actually two forms of the same disease? , 2019, Fertility and sterility.

[20]  B. Keserci,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging features influencing high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of adenomyosis with a nonperfused volume ratio of ≥90% as a measure of clinical treatment success: retrospective multivariate analysis , 2018, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[21]  F. Golfier,et al.  Accessory cavitated uterine mass: MRI features and surgical correlations of a rare but under-recognised entity , 2018, European Radiology.

[22]  M. Bazot,et al.  Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. , 2018, Fertility and sterility.

[23]  F. Osório,et al.  MRI for adenomyosis: a pictorial review , 2017, Insights into Imaging.

[24]  T. Minegishi,et al.  Complications and outcomes of pregnant women with adenomyosis in Japan , 2017, Reproductive medicine and biology.

[25]  F. Petraglia,et al.  Relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes , 2017, Human reproduction.

[26]  Lian Zhang,et al.  High intensity focused ultrasound treatment of adenomyosis: The relationship between the features of magnetic resonance imaging on T2 weighted images and the therapeutic efficacy. , 2017, European journal of radiology.

[27]  C. Catalano,et al.  MRI, US or real-time virtual sonography in the evaluation of adenomyosis? , 2017, La radiologia medica.

[28]  S. Angioni,et al.  Adenomyosis: a systematic review of medical treatment , 2016, Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology.

[29]  K. Togashi,et al.  Uterine anatomy and function on cine magnetic resonance imaging , 2016, Reproductive medicine and biology.

[30]  A. Hamimi.  What are the most reliable signs for the radiologic diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis? An ultrasound and MRI prospective , 2015 .

[31]  M. Habiba,et al.  Uterine Cystic Adenomyosis: A Disease of Younger Women. , 2015, Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology.

[32]  T. Bourne,et al.  Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group , 2015, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[33]  Xi-shi Liu,et al.  Clinical profiles of 710 premenopausal women with adenomyosis who underwent hysterectomy , 2014, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[34]  B. Tarlatzis,et al.  Uterus-sparing operative treatment for adenomyosis. , 2014, Fertility and sterility.

[35]  K. Togashi,et al.  Optimizing cine MRI for uterine peristalsis: A comparison of three different single shot fast spin echo techniques , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[36]  Giuseppe Benagiano,et al.  The pathophysiology of uterine adenomyosis: an update. , 2012, Fertility and sterility.

[37]  P. Lohle,et al.  Long-Term Follow-up of Uterine Artery Embolization for Symptomatic Adenomyosis , 2012, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[38]  Y. Kishi,et al.  Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[39]  M. Şımşek,et al.  Coexistence of adenomyosis in women operated for benign gynecological diseases , 2012, Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology.

[40]  A. Forman,et al.  Adenomyosis and junctional zone changes in patients with endometriosis. , 2011, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[41]  Jerome Delotte,et al.  MRI characteristics of the uterine junctional zone: from normal to the diagnosis of adenomyosis. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[42]  K. Matsuzaki,et al.  Adenomyosis: usual and unusual imaging manifestations, pitfalls, and problem-solving MR imaging techniques. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[43]  J. Daniels,et al.  Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review comparing test accuracy , 2010, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[44]  E. Merkle,et al.  MRI of the pelvis in women: 3D versus 2D T2-weighted technique. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[45]  S. Zangos,et al.  Duration of dysmenorrhoea and extent of adenomyosis visualised by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2008, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[46]  M. Kataoka,et al.  Do anticholinergic agents suppress uterine peristalsis and sporadic myometrial contractions at cine MR imaging? , 2008, Radiology.

[47]  M. Dueholm,et al.  Transvaginal ultrasound or MRI for diagnosis of adenomyosis , 2007, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[48]  Caroline Reinhold,et al.  Artifacts and pitfalls in MR imaging of the pelvis , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[49]  M. Kataoka,et al.  MRI of the female pelvis at 3T compared to 1.5T: Evaluation on high‐resolution T2‐weighted and HASTE images , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[50]  L. Nieman,et al.  Persistence of dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pain after optimal endometriosis surgery may indicate adenomyosis. , 2006, Fertility and sterility.

[51]  A. Ferenczy,et al.  Pathology and physiopathology of adenomyosis. , 2006, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[52]  M. Balogun.  Imaging diagnosis of adenomyosis , 2006 .

[53]  A. Lev-Toaff,et al.  Adenomyosis:Common and Uncommon Manifestations on Sonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2006, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[54]  T. Zacharia,et al.  Prevalence and distribution of adnexal findings suggesting endometriosis in patients with MR diagnosis of adenomyosis. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[55]  M. Bazot,et al.  Fast breath-hold T2-weighted MR imaging reduces interobserver variability in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[56]  D. Timmerman,et al.  Uterine adenomyosis in the infertility clinic. , 2003, Human reproduction update.

[57]  S. Ascher,et al.  MR imaging of diffuse adenomyosis changes after GnRH analog therapy , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[58]  E. Darai,et al.  Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. , 2001, Human reproduction.

[59]  H. Sakahara,et al.  Changes in myometrial and junctional zone thickness and signal intensity: demonstration with kinematic T2-weighted MR imaging. , 2001, Radiology.

[60]  F. Olesen,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. , 2001, Fertility and sterility.

[61]  M. Nisolle,et al.  Bladder endometriosis must be considered as bladder adenomyosis. , 2000, Fertility and sterility.

[62]  C. Reinhold,et al.  Uterine adenomyosis: endovaginal US and MR imaging features with histopathologic correlation. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[63]  S. Mccarthy,et al.  Cystic adenomyosis of the uterus: MRI , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[64]  K. Kjerulff,et al.  Pathologic findings from the Maryland Women's Health Study: practice patterns in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. , 1996, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[65]  C. Reinhold,et al.  Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. , 1996, Radiology.

[66]  H. Hricak,et al.  MR imaging in the evaluation of benign uterine masses: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced T1-weighted images. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[67]  T. McCauley,et al.  Junctional zone of the uterus: correlation of MR imaging and histologic examination of hysterectomy specimens. , 1991, Radiology.

[68]  K. Togashi,et al.  Enlarged uterus: differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging. , 1989, Radiology.

[69]  J. Craig.  The pathology of the female reproductive tract. , 1979, The American journal of pathology.

[70]  C. C. Bird,et al.  The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus--revisited. , 1972, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[71]  J. Sampson.  PERFORATING HEMORRHAGIC (CHOCOLATE) CYSTS OF THE OVARY: THEIR IMPORTANCE AND ESPECIALLY THEIR RELATION TO PELVIC ADENOMAS OF ENDOMETRIAL TYPE (ADENOMYOMA OF THE UTERUS, RECTOVAGINAL SEPTUM, SIGMOID, ETC.) , 1921 .

[72]  J. Brosens,et al.  Uterine adenomyosis: a need for uniform terminology and consensus classification. , 2008, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[73]  P. Greaves,et al.  Experimental adenomyosis. , 2006, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[74]  K. Togashi,et al.  MR imaging findings of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathologic features and diagnostic pitfalls. , 2005, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[75]  G. Moulin,et al.  The normal uterus on magnetic resonance imaging and variations associated with the hormonal state , 2005, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[76]  M. Candiani,et al.  Association rate between deep peritoneal endometriosis and other forms of the disease: pathogenetic implications , 2004 .

[77]  F. Olesen,et al.  Reproducibility of evaluation of the uterus by transvaginal sonography, hysterosonographic examination, hysteroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging. , 2002, Human reproduction.

[78]  G. Leyendecker.  Redefining endometriosis: endometriosis is an entity with extreme pleiomorphism. , 2000, Human reproduction.