A Cam Deformity Is Gradually Acquired During Skeletal Maturation in Adolescent and Young Male Soccer Players

Background: A cam deformity is a major risk factor for hip osteoarthritis, and its formation is thought to be influenced by high-impact sporting activities during growth. Purpose: To (1) prospectively study whether a cam deformity can evolve over time in adolescents and whether its formation only occurs during skeletal maturation and (2) examine whether clinical or radiographic features can predict the formation of a cam deformity. Study Design: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Preprofessional soccer players (N = 63; mean age, 14.43 years; range, 12-19 years) participated both at baseline and follow-up (mean follow-up, 2.4 ± 0.06 years). At both time points, standardized anteroposterior and frog-leg lateral radiographs were obtained. For each hip, the α angle was measured, and the anterosuperior head-neck junction was classified by a 3-point visual system as normal, flattened, or having a prominence. Differences between baseline and follow-up values for the α angle and the prevalence of each visual hip classification were calculated. Additionally, the amount of internal hip rotation, growth plate extension into the neck, and neck shaft angle were determined. Results: Overall, there was a significant increase in the prevalence of a cam deformity during follow-up. In boys aged 12 and 13 years at baseline, the prevalence of a flattened head-neck junction increased significantly during follow-up (13.6% to 50.0%; P = .002). In all hips with an open growth plate at baseline, the prevalence of a prominence increased from 2.1% to 17.7% (P = .002). After closure of the proximal femoral growth plate, there was no significant increase in the prevalence or increase in severity of a cam deformity. The α angle increased significantly from 59.4° at baseline to 61.3° at follow-up (P = .018). The amount of growth plate extension was significantly associated with the α angle and hip classification (P = .001). A small neck shaft angle and limited internal rotation were associated with cam deformities and could also significantly predict the formation of cam deformities (α angle >60°) at follow-up. Conclusion: In youth soccer players, cam deformities gradually develop during skeletal maturation and are probably stable from the time of growth plate closure. The formation of a cam deformity might be prevented by adjusting athletic activities during a small period of skeletal growth, which will have a major effect on the prevalence of hip osteoarthritis.

[1]  S. Bierma-Zeinstra,et al.  Cam impingement causes osteoarthritis of the hip: a nationwide prospective cohort study (CHECK) , 2012, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[2]  C. Pattyn,et al.  Hip Morphological Characteristics and Range of Internal Rotation in Femoroacetabular Impingement , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[3]  J. McWilliams,et al.  Imaging prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in symptomatic patients, athletes, and asymptomatic individuals: A systematic review. , 2016, European journal of radiology.

[4]  Nigel Arden,et al.  Osteoarthritis: epidemiology. , 2006, Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology.

[5]  G. Stoddard,et al.  Hip internal rotation is correlated to radiographic findings of cam femoroacetabular impingement in collegiate football players. , 2012, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[6]  Klaus A. Siebenrock,et al.  Growth Plate Alteration Precedes Cam-type Deformity in Elite Basketball Players , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  J. Hodler,et al.  The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  N. Magnenat-Thalmann,et al.  Extreme hip motion in professional ballet dancers: dynamic and morphological evaluation based on magnetic resonance imaging , 2013, Skeletal Radiology.

[9]  M. Leunig,et al.  A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  H Weinans,et al.  Cam impingement: defining the presence of a cam deformity by the alpha angle: data from the CHECK cohort and Chingford cohort. , 2014, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[11]  R. Sikka,et al.  Increasing alpha angle is predictive of athletic-related "hip" and "groin" pain in collegiate National Football League prospects. , 2013, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[12]  K. Siebenrock,et al.  The Cam-type Deformity of the Proximal Femur Arises in Childhood in Response to Vigorous Sporting Activity , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  T. Spector,et al.  The association between hip morphology parameters and nineteen-year risk of end-stage osteoarthritis of the hip: A nested case–control study , 2011, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[14]  Jan-Åke Nilsson,et al.  Former Male Elite Athletes Have a Higher Prevalence of Osteoarthritis and Arthroplasty in the Hip and Knee Than Expected , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[15]  R. O. Murray,et al.  Athletic activity in adolescence as an etiological factor in degenerative hip disease. , 1971, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Prevalence of cam‐type deformity on hip magnetic resonance imaging in young males: A cross‐sectional study , 2010, Arthritis care & research.

[17]  R. Ganz,et al.  Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  John M. Clark,et al.  Correlation Between Internal Rotation and Bony Anatomy in the Hip , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  D. Tönnis Normal values of the hip joint for the evaluation of X-rays in children and adults. , 1976, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  Robert F. LaPrade,et al.  Prevalence of Increased Alpha Angles as a Measure of Cam-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement in Youth Ice Hockey Players , 2013, The American journal of sports medicine.

[21]  Maria A. Serrat,et al.  Variation in mammalian proximal femoral development: comparative analysis of two distinct ossification patterns , 2007, Journal of anatomy.

[22]  S. Bierma-Zeinstra,et al.  Total hip replacement but not clinical osteoarthritis can be predicted by the shape of the hip: a prospective cohort study (CHECK). , 2012, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[23]  K. Siebenrock,et al.  Femoral morphology and epiphyseal growth plate changes of the hip during maturation: MR assessments in a 1-year follow-up on a cross-sectional asymptomatic cohort in the age range of 9–17 years , 2012, Skeletal Radiology.

[24]  D. Cooperman,et al.  Subclinical Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis. Relationship to Osteoarthrosis of the Hip* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  Harrie Weinans,et al.  The Development of Cam-Type Deformity in Adolescent and Young Male Soccer Players , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[26]  Wudbhav N. Sankar,et al.  Femoroacetabular Impingement: Defining the Condition and its Role in the Pathophysiology of Osteoarthritis , 2013, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[27]  R. Ganz,et al.  Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[28]  P. Beaulé,et al.  Prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  Femoroacetabular impingement: prevention or intervention? The sports physician's quandary , 2014, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[30]  H. Weinans,et al.  Pathophysiology of peri-articular bone changes in osteoarthritis. , 2012, Bone.

[31]  David J. Petron,et al.  Radiographic prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in collegiate football players: AAOS Exhibit Selection. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[32]  J. Bond,et al.  Decreased Range of Motion Is Associated With Structural Hip Deformity in Asymptomatic Adolescent Athletes , 2013, The American journal of sports medicine.

[33]  T. A. Mirtz,et al.  The Effects of Physical Activity on the Epiphyseal Growth Plates: A Review of the Literature on Normal Physiology and Clinical Implications , 2011, Journal of clinical medicine research.

[34]  Thomas G. Ryan,et al.  Femoroacetabular Impingement in Former High-Level Youth Soccer Players , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[35]  Michael B. Gerhardt,et al.  The Prevalence of Radiographic Hip Abnormalities in Elite Soccer Players , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[36]  Michael Doherty,et al.  Nonspherical femoral head shape (pistol grip deformity), neck shaft angle, and risk of hip osteoarthritis: a case-control study. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[37]  A. Carr,et al.  Cam impingement of the hip—a risk factor for hip osteoarthritis , 2013, Nature Reviews Rheumatology.

[38]  R. Ganz,et al.  Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[39]  R. Ganz,et al.  Abnormal Extension of the Femoral Head Epiphysis as a Cause of Cam Impingement , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.