Artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) provides an important source of livelihood for rural communities throughout the world. These activities are frequently accompanied by extensive environmental degradation and deplorable socio-economic conditions, both during operations and well after mining activities have ceased. As gold is easily sold and not influenced by the instability of local governments, it is the main mineral extracted by artisanal miners. Mercury (Hg) amalgamation is the preferred gold recovery method employed by artisanal gold miners and its misuse can result in serious health hazards for miners involved in gold extraction, as well as for surrounding community inhabitants, who may be exposed to mercury via the food chain. The rudimentary techniques characteristic of ASM result in a number of occupational hazards, other although most risks are primarily attributed to machinery accidents and ground failure, such as landslides and shaft collapses. Several technologies and methods commonly utilized by large-scale mining operations can be downsized to smaller scale operations. However, the likelihood that miners will adopt these large-scale methods, or those developed specifically for ASM, depends upon some key factors. For an artisanal miner, these factors include: (1) increased or comparable simplicity, (2) quick recovery of the economic mineral, and (3) demonstrated financial gain. Other practical aspects, such as the availability of materials (chemicals, steel rods, piping, generators, etc), capital and operating cost requirements and access to technical support, also influence acceptance of new techniques. This article will review four inter-related areas: first, the limitations and benefits, for ASM, of a number of specific technologies; second, the role of Processing Centers in education, information dissemination and provision of “clean” services; third, benefits and challenges associated with formalization of ASM activities; and fourth, the contribution of ASM to the development of sustainability of communities, primarily through diversification of livelihoods. The appropriate application of technologies, particularly given the diversity of ASM communities around the world, will also be explored. 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
[1]
Marcello M. Veiga,et al.
Abandoned artisanal gold mines in the Brazilian Amazon: A legacy of mercury pollution
,
2002
.
[2]
Norman S. Jennings,et al.
Small-scale gold mining: examples from Bolivia, Philippines and Zimbabwe
,
1999
.
[3]
J. Davidson,et al.
The transformation and successful development of small‐scale mining enterprises in developing countries
,
1993
.
[4]
John Moffet,et al.
2. Non-Regulatory Environmental Measures
,
1999
.
[5]
Marcello M. Veiga,et al.
Introducing New Technologies for Abatement of Global Mercury Pollution in
,
1997
.
[6]
O. Malm,et al.
Mercury in the Madeira River ecosystem, Rondônia, Brazil
,
1991
.
[7]
Andrew Scott,et al.
Small‐scale mining legislation and regulatory frameworks
,
1999
.
[8]
Manfred. Walle,et al.
Safety & health in small-scale surface mines : a handbook
,
2001
.
[9]
Marcello M. Veiga,et al.
Mining with communities
,
2001
.
[10]
Marcello M. Veiga,et al.
Earthworms as bioindicators of mercury pollution from mining and other industrial activities
,
2002,
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis.
[11]
Rudolf Reuther,et al.
Mercury pollution due to gold mining in the Madeira river basin, Brazil.
,
1990
.
[12]
Mamadou Barry,et al.
Regularizing informal mining - a summary of the proceedings of the international roundtable on artisanal mining
,
1996
.
[13]
Dietmar Plath,et al.
Milne Bay, Papua New Guinea
,
1992
.
[14]
Arthur F. Taggart,et al.
Handbook of mineral dressing : ores and industrial minerals
,
1945
.