Is the Computer-Aided Detection Scheme for Lung Nodule Also Useful in Detecting Lung Cancer?

Objective: To evaluate the impact of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system on the performance of observers for the detection of both lung nodules and lung cancers. Materials and Methods: One hundred fifty computed tomographic scans were evaluated. Database included 23 lung cancers (long diameter <20 mm), nodules stable for at least 2 years, and normal cases. Five chest radiologists and 5 radiology residents each independently recorded the locus of each nodule candidate and assigned a confidence score for the likelihood of nodule and malignancy without CAD; then, the interpretation was repeated with the use of CAD. A consensus panel of 2 chest radiologists served as a reference standard for the nodules. Histological confirmation was a reference standard for the cancers. The performances of the observers for the detection of nodules and cancer with and without CAD were compared using jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: The performance of detecting lung nodules was increased significantly with CAD for all radiologists and subgroups (P < 0.01). Although the overall performance of detecting lung cancers was not affected significantly with the use of CAD (P > 0.05), 4 lung cancers missed by 3 residents on their initial observation were additionally detected with CAD. Eighteen of 23 lung cancers were detected by CAD itself. Conclusions: The overall radiologists' performance of detecting lung nodules was improved significantly with the use of CAD, whereas no statistical significance was observed for the detection of lung cancers. The use of CAD, however, contributed to the detection of additional lung cancers for less experienced readers.

[1]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening , 1999, The Lancet.

[2]  S. Armato,et al.  Lung cancers missed at low-dose helical CT screening in a general population: comparison of clinical, histopathologic, and imaging findings. , 2002, Radiology.

[3]  O. Miettinen,et al.  CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  S. Swensen,et al.  Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography. , 2000, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[5]  S. Armato,et al.  Lung cancer: performance of automated lung nodule detection applied to cancers missed in a CT screening program. , 2002, Radiology.

[6]  F. Fischbach,et al.  Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness , 2003, European Radiology.

[7]  P. Hájek,et al.  Index of Terms , 1998 .

[8]  K. Awai,et al.  Pulmonary nodules at chest CT: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists' detection performance. , 2004, Radiology.

[9]  Dev P Chakraborty,et al.  Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. , 2004, Medical physics.

[10]  G. Chatellier,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: preliminary experience with three-dimensional evaluation. , 2004, Radiology.

[11]  Jeong Won Lee,et al.  The Potential Contribution of a Computer-Aided Detection System for Lung Nodule Detection in Multidetector Row Computed Tomography , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[12]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Lung image database consortium: developing a resource for the medical imaging research community. , 2004, Radiology.

[13]  B. Zheng,et al.  On the testing and reporting of computer-aided detection results for lung cancer detection. , 2004, Radiology.

[14]  Jin Mo Goo,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis of localized ground-glass opacity in the lung at CT: initial experience. , 2005, Radiology.

[15]  K. Bae,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: automated detection on CT images with morphologic matching algorithm--preliminary results. , 2005, Radiology.

[16]  J. Goo,et al.  Volumetric measurement of synthetic lung nodules with multi-detector row CT: effect of various image reconstruction parameters and segmentation thresholds on measurement accuracy. , 2005, Radiology.

[17]  K. Bae,et al.  Automated detection of pulmonary nodules on CT images: effect of section thickness and reconstruction interval--initial results. , 2005, Radiology.

[18]  Anthony J. Sherbondy,et al.  Pulmonary nodules on multi-detector row CT scans: performance comparison of radiologists and computer-aided detection. , 2005, Radiology.

[19]  Jin Mo Goo,et al.  Computer-Aided Detection of Lung Nodules on Chest CT: Issues to be Solved before Clinical Use , 2005, Korean journal of radiology.

[20]  Dev P Chakraborty,et al.  Analysis of location specific observer performance data: validated extensions of the jackknife free-response (JAFROC) method. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[21]  Takeshi Nakaura,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: estimation of malignancy at thin-section helical CT--effect of computer-aided diagnosis on performance of radiologists. , 2006, Radiology.

[22]  J. Goo,et al.  Nodular Ground-Glass Opacities on Thin-section CT: Size Change during Follow-up and Pathological Results , 2007, Korean journal of radiology.

[23]  Jin Mo Goo,et al.  Nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histologic correlation and evaluation of change at follow-up. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.