Trade Facilitation and Economic Development : New Approach to Quantifying the Impact

This article analyzes the relationship between trade facilitation and trade flows in the Asia Pacific region. Country specific data for port efficiency, customs environment, regulatory environment, and e-business usage are used to construct indicators for measuring trade facilitation. The relationship between these indicators and trade flows is estimated using a gravity model that includes tariffs and other standard variables. Enhanced port efficiency has a large and positive effect on trade flows. Regulatory barriers deter trade. Improvements in customs and greater e-business use significantly expand trade but to a lesser degree than improvements in ports or regulations. The benefits of specific trade facilitation efforts are estimated by quantifying differential improvements in these four areas among members of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). A scenario in which APEC members with below-average indicators improve capacity halfway to the average forall members shows that intra-APEC trade could increase by Dollar 254 billion, or 21 percent of intra-APEC trade flows.

[1]  A. Rose,et al.  Undertstanding the Home Market Effect and the Gravity Equation: the Role of Differentiating Goods , 1998 .

[2]  C. Mann,et al.  Trade Facilitation and Economic Development: Measuring the Impact , 2003 .

[3]  J. Frankel.  Regional Trading Blocs in the world economic system, reseñado por Antonio Ortiz-Mena L.N. , 1997 .

[4]  Diana Weinhold,et al.  On the Effect of the Internet on International Trade , 2000 .

[5]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge.  Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[6]  Sue E. Eckert,et al.  Global Electronic Commerce: A Policy Primer , 2000 .

[7]  Subsidies in Chilean Public Utilities , 2000 .

[8]  Catherine L. Mann,et al.  Trade Facilitation: A Development Perspective in the Asia Pacific Region * , 2002 .

[9]  Aaditya Mattoo,et al.  Trade in International Maritime Services: How Much Does Policy Matter? , 1999 .

[10]  Trade Frictions and Welfare in the Gravity Model: How Much of the Iceberg Melts? , 2006 .

[11]  T. Otsuki,et al.  Saving two in a billion:: quantifying the trade effect of European food safety standards on African exports , 2001 .

[12]  J. Tinbergen.  Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy , 1964 .

[13]  Edward J. Balistreri,et al.  Trade Frictions and Welfare in the Gravity Model: How Much of the Iceberg Melts? , 2004 .

[14]  T. Otsuki,et al.  What price precaution? European harmonisation of aflatoxin regulations and African groundnut exports , 2001 .

[15]  S. Evenett,et al.  On Theories Explaining the Success of the Gravity Equation , 1998, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  H. Wall,et al.  Gravity Model Specification and the Effects of the Canada-U.S. Border , 2000 .

[17]  Alejandro Micco,et al.  Maritime transport costs and port efficiency , 2002 .

[18]  A. Alesina,et al.  Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why? , 1998 .

[19]  James E. Anderson,et al.  Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle , 2001 .

[20]  D. Rodrik,et al.  External Debt, Adjustment, and Burden Sharing: A Unified Framework , 1992 .

[21]  本庄 美佳,et al.  フィンランドに学ぶ国際競争力--"World Competitiveness Yearbook 2003"より , 2003 .

[22]  T. Hertel,et al.  Dynamic Effects of the "New Age" Free Trade Agreement between Japan and Singapore , 2001, GTAP Working Paper.

[23]  James E. Anderson.  A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation , 1979 .

[24]  V. Foster,et al.  Accounting for Poverty in Infrastructure Reform: Learning from Latin America's Experience. WBI Development Studies. , 2001 .