Toward a Curry-Howard Equivalence for Linear, Reversible Computation

In this paper, we present a linear and reversible language with inductive and coinductive types, together with a Curry-Howard correspondence with the logic : linear logic extended with least and greatest fixed points allowing inductive and coinductive statements. Linear, reversible computation makes an important sub-class of quantum computation without measurement. In the latter, the notion of purely quantum recursive type is not yet well understood. Moreover, models for reasoning about quantum algorithms only provide complex types for classical datatypes: there are usually no types for purely quantum objects beside tensors of quantum bits. This work is a first step towards understanding purely quantum recursive types.

[1]  M. Nivat Fiftieth volume of theoretical computer science , 1988 .

[2]  Peter Selinger,et al.  A categorical model for a quantum circuit description language , 2017, QPL.

[3]  Jennifer Paykin,et al.  QWIRE: a core language for quantum circuits , 2017, POPL.

[4]  Xavier Leroy,et al.  Formal verification of a realistic compiler , 2009, CACM.

[5]  John C. Reynolds,et al.  Separation logic: a logic for shared mutable data structures , 2002, Proceedings 17th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science.

[6]  William A. Howard,et al.  The formulae-as-types notion of construction , 1969 .

[7]  M. Fosgerau,et al.  An estimate of the effect of waiting time in the Danish asylum system on post-resettlement employment among refugees: Separating the pure delay effect from the effects of the conditions under which refugees are waiting , 2018, PloS one.

[8]  H B Curry,et al.  Functionality in Combinatory Logic. , 1934, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Benoît Valiron,et al.  A Lambda Calculus for Quantum Computation with Classical Control , 2005, TLCA.

[10]  Pierre Castéran,et al.  Interactive Theorem Proving and Program Development , 2004, Texts in Theoretical Computer Science An EATCS Series.

[11]  Pierre-Yves Strub,et al.  Dependent types and multi-monadic effects in F* , 2016, POPL.

[12]  Peter Wittek,et al.  Open source software in quantum computing , 2018, PloS one.

[13]  Alexis Saurin,et al.  Infinitary proof theory : the multiplicative additive case , 2018 .

[14]  Andreas Haeberlen,et al.  Linear dependent types for differential privacy , 2013, POPL.

[15]  David Baelde,et al.  Least and Greatest Fixed Points in Linear Logic , 2007, TOCL.

[16]  Juliana Kaizer Vizzotto,et al.  From Symmetric Pattern-Matching to Quantum Control , 2018, FoSSaCS.

[17]  Exequiel Rivas,et al.  The next 700 relational program logics , 2019, Proc. ACM Program. Lang..

[18]  Derek Dreyer,et al.  RustBelt: securing the foundations of the rust programming language , 2017, Proc. ACM Program. Lang..

[19]  Patrick Lincoln,et al.  Linear logic , 1992, SIGA.

[20]  Yves Bertot,et al.  Interactive Theorem Proving and Program Development: Coq'Art The Calculus of Inductive Constructions , 2010 .