A new type of microelectrode for obtaining unitary recordings in the human spinal cord.

OBJECT In this paper the authors report on the conception and adjustment of a microelectrode used to obtain unitary recordings in the human spinal cord. METHOD To overcome the difficulties related to intraoperative pulsations of the spinal cord, the authors opted to use a floating microelectrode. Because the recordings are obtained most often from spontaneous activities, it is difficult, with a single microelectrode, to separate spikes from electrical artifacts that are related to the switching of devices. Consequently, the authors designed a dual microelectrode made of two tungsten-in-glass-attached microelectrodes separated by 300 microm. Because the two electrodes cannot obtain recordings in the same neuron, it is possible to distinguish unambiguously spikes (recorded on one tip) from electrical artifacts (recorded simultaneously on the two tips). The dual microelectrode is 2 cm long, with a 20-microm tip length, and 800 to 1200-Ohms impedance. This microelectrode can be implanted "free hand," in the dorsal horn, by using a microsurgical forceps under a surgical microscope. The data analysis is performed off-line with spike sorter hardware. In the dorsal horns in 17 patients who were selected to undergo a dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) rhizotomy to treat various pathological conditions, unitary recordings were obtained using this double microelectrode. The authors recorded 57 neurons in good conditions of stability and isolation. CONCLUSIONS The microelectrode described in this paper was successfully used to obtain recordings in neurons in more than 85% of the patients. This simplified, floating double microelectrode can therefore be considered for use in microsurgical DREZ rhizotomy to obtain unitary recordings in the human spinal dorsal horn.

[1]  M. Zimmermann,et al.  Characteristics of spinal dorsal horn neurons after partial chronic deafferentation by dorsal root transection , 1983, Pain.

[2]  J. Sandkühler,et al.  Differential effects of spinalization on discharge patterns and discharge rates of simultaneously recorded nociceptive and non-nociceptive spinal dorsal horn neurons , 1995, Pain.

[3]  L. E. White,et al.  Chronic deafferentation of human spinal cord neurons. , 1968, Journal of neurosurgery.

[4]  A. Ward,et al.  Neuronal hyperactivity in experimental trigeminal deafferentation. , 1971, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  Eli Eliav,et al.  Abnormal discharge originates at the site of nerve injury in experimental constriction neuropathy (CCI) in the rat , 1996, Pain.

[6]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Responsiveness of the somatosensory system after nerve injury and amputation in the human hand , 1994, Annals of neurology.

[7]  J. T. Murphy,et al.  Abnormal single-unit activity recorded in the somatosensory thalamus of a quadriplegic patient with central pain , 1987, Pain.

[8]  R. E. Study,et al.  Spontaneous action potential activity in isolated dorsal root ganglion neurons from rats with a painful neuropathy , 1996, Pain.

[9]  K. Berkley,et al.  Diencephalic mechanisms of pain sensation , 1985, Brain Research Reviews.

[10]  A. J. Blomquist,et al.  Single neuron activity in posterior columns of the human spinal cord. , 1967, Journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  C. L. M. V. SClllE Neuropathy , 1999, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[12]  P. Wall,et al.  Plasticity in the spinal cord sensory map following peripheral nerve injury in rats , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  P. Mertens,et al.  Ablative neurosurgical procedures for the treatment of chronic pain , 1990, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  A. Vallbo,et al.  Intraneural microstimulation in man. Its relation to specificity of tactile sensations. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  D. Albe-Fessard,et al.  Electrophysiological study of cervical dorsal horn cells in partially deafferented rats , 1981, PAIN.

[16]  L. Pubols,et al.  Recovery of function in dorsal horn following partial deafferentation. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Chronic changes in the response of cells in adult cat dorsal horn following partial deafferentation; the appearance of responding cells in a previously non-responsive region A.I. Basbaum and P.D. Wall, Brain Res., 116 (1976) 181–204 , 1977, Pain.

[18]  H C Kwan,et al.  Methods for microstimulation and recording of single neurons and evoked potentials in the human central nervous system. , 1988, Journal of neurosurgery.

[19]  C. Legéndy,et al.  Bursts and recurrences of bursts in the spike trains of spontaneously active striate cortex neurons. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  D. Albe-Fessard,et al.  Deafferentation hypersensitivity in the rat after dorsal rhizotomy: A possible animal model of chronic pain , 1979, PAIN.

[21]  J. Ovelmen-Levitt Abnormal physiology of the dorsal horn as related to the deafferentation syndrome. , 1988, Applied neurophysiology.

[22]  J. Eggermont,et al.  Spontaneous burst firing in cat primary auditory cortex: age and depth dependence and its effect on neural interaction measures. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  M. Magnin,et al.  Intra-operative unit recordings in the human dorsal horn with a simplified floating microelectrode. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  A. Ward,et al.  Some effects of deafferentation on neurons of the cat spinal cord. , 1967, Archives of neurology.