Volume and surface-area measurements using tomography, with an example from the Brenham pallasite meteorite

Increased computer speed has helped to proliferate tomography throughout the geosciences. Although best known from the medical CATscan, tomography is also a powerful tool for geological problems. Whereas qualitative tomography is widely used, quantitative data from tomograms are not so commonly available. Presented here are two programs, Electron Tomography Segmentation, surface Area, and Volume (ETSAV) and Electron Tomography CUTter (ETCut), that were written to obtain quantitative volume and surface-area data from tomograms. Based on a specified threshold value, ETSAV distinguishes objects within a tomogram and then returns volume and surface-area data for each object. If object separation is unsatisfactory using a single threshold, ETCut is called to digitally separate objects that appear connected in the tomogram, allowing ETSAV to perform its functions. By knowing the nature of the object of interest, error can be corrected to, on average, less than 5% for a single object; combined volumes of many particles of different sizes may result in lesser errors. A section of the Brenham pallasite meteorite was examined using the programs. Olivine comprises 67.2% of the volume (50.4%wt%), followed by FeNi metal at 23.1% (39.3%wt%), troilite at 4.4% (4.8%wt%), and schreibersite at 3.4% (5.5%wt%). In all, 56.1% and 44.7% of the troilite and schreibersite surface areas, respectively, border olivine, suggesting that they wet olivine. Since the programs can be applied to any tomogram, from any field, there are many potential applications.

[1]  Vincent Argiro,et al.  VOXELS: data in 3-D , 1992 .

[2]  H. Urey.  Chemical Evidence Relative to the Origin of the Solar System , 1966 .

[3]  Dork Sahagian,et al.  Recongnition and separation of discrete objects with in complex 3D voxelized structures , 2001 .

[4]  Vladik Kreinovich,et al.  An IDL/ENVI Implementation of the FFT Based Algorithm for Automatic Image Registration , 2003 .

[5]  Thorne Lay,et al.  The core–mantle boundary layer and deep Earth dynamics , 1998, Nature.

[6]  M. Chukalina,et al.  A new nondestructive X-ray method for the determination of the 3D mineralogy at the micrometer scale , 2004 .

[7]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Electron tomography of nanoparticle clusters: Implications for atmospheric lifetimes and radiative forcing of soot , 2005 .

[8]  Salvatore Torquato,et al.  Extraction of morphological quantities from a digitized medium , 1995 .

[9]  G. Panza,et al.  Active tectonics in Central Italy: constraints from surface wave tomography and source moment tensor inversion , 2003 .

[10]  P. Buseck.  Pallasite meteorites—mineralogy, petrology and geochemistry , 1977 .

[11]  Laura Bonetta.  Zooming in on electron tomography , 2005, Nature Methods.

[12]  Richard A. Ketcham,et al.  Computational methods for quantitative analysis of three-dimensional features in geological specimens , 2005 .

[13]  T. Rowe,et al.  High resolution computed tomography: A breakthrough technology for earth scientists , 1997 .

[14]  W. R. Kelly,et al.  Chemical fractionations in meteorites—VIII. Iron meteorites and the cosmochemical history of the metal phase , 1977 .

[15]  L. Lines.  Applications of tomography to borehole and reflection seismology , 1991 .