Quantifying benefits of a dynamic gap-out feature at an actuated traffic signalized intersection under cooperative vehicle infrastructure system

Traffic signal timing optimization and control are one of the most cost-effective ways of improving urban arterial network congestions. Among various control modes, actuated traffic signal control is designed to provide green times where they are needed and it uses a pre-specified gap-out time to determine early termination of current phase green time. However, the effectiveness of its signal state decisions is limited by its dependence on vehicular information from fixed point sensors. With the emerging wireless communication technology based on cooperative vehicle-infrastructure system known as IntelliDrive, individual vehicular information (e.g., speed, acceleration, and location) is needed to be fully utilized for traffic signal control applications. This paper presents a dynamic gap-out approach that uses individual vehicular information and quantified benefits of the proposed approach via simulation. The timing plans were optimized by the genetic algorithm for both the traditional and the proposed gap-out cases. The results based on a four-leg intersection indicated that the dynamic gap-out reduced vehicular delays by 12.5% over existing regular gap-out.

[1]  Thomas Urbanik,et al.  Traffic Signal Optimization Program for Oversaturated Conditions: Genetic Algorithm Approach , 1999 .

[2]  Suvrajeet Sen,et al.  Design and evaluation of real-time adaptive traffic signal control algorithms , 2001 .

[3]  Tom Bryer,et al.  EVIPAS: A COMPUTER MODEL FOR THE OPTIMAL DESIGN OF A VEHICLE-ACTUATED TRAFFIC SIGNAL , 1987 .

[4]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of industrial engineering : technology and operations management , 2001 .

[5]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[6]  Lawrence A Klein,et al.  SUMMARY OF VEHICLE DETECTION AND SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGIES USED IN INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[7]  Suh-Wen Chiou,et al.  Simultaneously optimizing link tolls and signal settings in a road network , 2009 .

[8]  Ilsoo Yun,et al.  Stochastic optimization method for coordinated actuated signal systems , 2003 .

[9]  Peter T. Martin,et al.  Optimizing Signal Timings from the Field , 2009 .

[10]  R Akcelic LANE-BY-LANE MODELLING OF UNEQUAL LANE USE AND FLARES AT ROUNDABOUTS AND SIGNALISED INTERSECTIONS: THE SIDRA SOLUTION , 1997 .

[11]  H E Haenel,et al.  A REPORT ON THE USER'S MANUAL FOR PROGRESSION ANALYSIS AND SIGNAL SYSTEM EVALUATION ROUTINE--PASSER II , 1974 .

[12]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  Preparing the Way for Vehicle-Infrastructure Integration , 2005 .

[13]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of industrial engineering , 2001 .

[14]  Byungkyu Park,et al.  Improving Actuated Traffic Signal Control Operations Using Concept of Dynamic Gap-Out , 2006 .

[15]  Vice President,et al.  Institute of Transportation Engineers , 2010 .

[16]  Ghassan Abu-Lebdeh,et al.  Genetic Algorithms for Traffic Signal Control and Queue Management of Oversaturated Two-Way Arterials , 2000 .

[17]  D I Robertson,et al.  TRANSYT: A TRAFFIC NETWORK STUDY TOOL , 1969 .