Variation in female mate choice within guppy populations: population divergence, multiple ornaments and the maintenance of polymorphism.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. A. Fisher,et al. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .
[2] Ø. Winge,et al. Colour inheritance and sex determination in Lebistes , 1947, Heredity.
[3] H. Waterbolk,et al. Ethological Studies On Lebistes Reticulatus (Peters) , 1955 .
[4] J. V. Iersel,et al. Preening of Two Tern Species. a Study On Displacement Activities , 1958 .
[5] D. Falconer,et al. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1961 .
[6] N. Liley. Ethological isolating mechanisms in four sympatric species of poeciliid fishes , 1966 .
[7] J. A. Farr. MALE RARITY OR NOVELTY, FEMALE CHOICE BEHAVIOR, AND SEXUAL SELECTION IN THE GUPPY, POECILIA RETICULATA PETERS (PISCES: POECILIIDAE) , 1977, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[8] L. Ehrman,et al. Rare male mating advantage , 1978, Nature.
[9] J. Endler. A Predator’s View of Animal Color Patterns , 1978 .
[10] N. Liley,et al. A sexual pheromone in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata (Peters) , 1979 .
[11] J. A. Farr. Social Behavior Patterns as Determinants of Reproductive Success in the Guppy, Poecilia Reticulata Peters (Pisces: Poeciliidae) an Experimental Study of the Effects of Intermale Competition, Female Choice, and Sexual Selection , 1980 .
[12] J. Endler. NATURAL SELECTION ON COLOR PATTERNS IN POECILIA RETICULATA , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[13] R. Lande. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[14] P. Taylor,et al. The lek paradox is not resolved , 1982 .
[15] W. G. Hill,et al. Mechanisms for frequency-dependent mating success , 1984 .
[16] J. A. Farr,et al. The inheritance of quantitative fitness traits in guppies, Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae). II. tests for inbreeding effects , 1984, Heredity.
[17] J. Endler. Predation, light intensity and courtship behaviour in Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae) , 1987, Animal Behaviour.
[18] L. Partridge,et al. The rare-male effect: what is its evolutionary significance? , 1988, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[19] L. Partridge. Frequency-dependent mating preferences in female fruitflies? , 1989, Behavior genetics.
[20] N. Barton,et al. Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know? , 1989, Annual review of genetics.
[21] J. Endler,et al. Correlated Evolution of Female Mating Preferences and Male Color Patterns in the Guppy Poecilia reticulata , 1990, Science.
[22] T. Guilford,et al. Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals , 1991, Animal Behaviour.
[23] M. Kirkpatrick,et al. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek , 1991, Nature.
[24] J. Endler. Variation in the appearance of guppy color patterns to guppies and their predators under different visual conditions , 1991, Vision Research.
[25] F. Breden,et al. MITOCHONDRIAL DNA SEQUENCE VARIATION AMONG NATURAL POPULATIONS OF THE TRINIDAD GUPPY, POECILIA RETICULATA , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[26] J. Endler. Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.
[27] A. Houde. Sex-linked heritability of a sexually selected character in a natural population of Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae) (guppies) , 1992, Heredity.
[28] A. Magurran,et al. Genetic consequences of an artificial introduction of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) in N. Trinidad , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[29] J. Endler. Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. , 1993, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[30] M. Ryan,et al. SPECIES RECOGNITION AND SEXUAL SELECTION AS A UNITARY PROBLEM IN ANIMAL COMMUNICATION , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[31] Y. Iwasa,et al. Evolution of multiple sexual preferences by Fisher’s runaway process of sexual selection , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[32] A. Pomiankowski,et al. Linked sexiness and choosiness. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[33] A. Houde. Effect of artificial selection on male colour patterns on mating preference of female guppies , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[34] F. Breden,et al. Test of indirect models of selection in the Trinidad guppy , 1994, Heredity.
[35] L. Dugatkin,et al. Variability and repeatability of female mating preference in the guppy , 1995, Animal Behaviour.
[36] J. Endler,et al. GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN FEMALE PREFERENCES FOR MALE TRAITS IN POECILIA RETICULATA , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[37] R. Brooks,et al. Female choice in a feral guppy population: are there multiple cues? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.
[38] Rufus A. Johnstone,et al. Honest advertisement of multiple qualities using multiple signals , 1995 .
[39] A. Pomiankowski,et al. The genetic basis of female mate preferences , 1995 .
[40] J. Endler. Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[41] A. Møller,et al. A resolution of the lek paradox , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[42] Rufus A. Johnstone,et al. Multiple Displays in Animal Communication:`Backup Signals' and `Multiple Messages' , 1996 .
[43] R. Brooks. Copying and the repeatability of mate choice , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[44] L. Rowe,et al. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[45] John A. Allen,et al. Protective polymorphism in populations of computer-simulated moth-like prey , 1997 .
[46] A. Kodric-Brown,et al. Repeatability of female choice in the guppy: response to live and videotaped males , 1997, Animal Behaviour.
[47] M. Petrie,et al. VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[48] A. Houde. Sex, Color, and Mate Choice in Guppies , 1998 .
[49] A. Magurran. Population differentiation without speciation , 1998 .
[50] A. Bond,et al. Apostatic selection by blue jays produces balanced polymorphism in virtual prey , 1998, Nature.
[51] Y. Iwasa,et al. Runaway ornament diversity caused by Fisherian sexual selection. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[52] J A Endler,et al. Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[53] A. Hoffmann. Is the heritability for courtship and mating speed in Drosophila (fruit fly) low? , 1999, Heredity.
[54] W. Cade,et al. Correlated-response-to-selection experiments designed to test for a genetic correlation between female preferences and male traits yield biased results , 1999, Animal Behaviour.
[55] J. Godin,et al. Geographic variation in multiple paternity within natural populations of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[56] Widemo,et al. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[57] R. Brooks,et al. Multiple Sexual Ornaments Coevolve with Multiple Mating Preferences , 1999, The American Naturalist.
[58] A. Magurran,et al. Familiarity breeds contempt in guppies , 1999, Nature.
[59] K. Hughes,et al. Familiarity leads to female mate preference for novel males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata , 1999, Animal Behaviour.
[60] D. Millie,et al. Carotenoid limitation of sexual coloration along an environmental gradient in guppies , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[61] C. Rowe. Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals , 1999, Animal Behaviour.
[62] P. J. Moore,et al. Balancing sexual selection through opposing mate choice and male competition , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[63] A. Magurran,et al. Gene flow in Trinidadian guppies , 2000 .
[64] W. Cade,et al. Sexual selection and speciation in field crickets. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[65] A. Magurran,et al. Multiple benefits of multiple mating in guppies. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[66] A. Magurran,et al. Evidence for sperm transfer during sneaky mating in wild Trinidadian guppies , 2000 .
[67] R. Brooks. Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival , 2000, Nature.
[68] M. Ptacek. The role of mating preferences in shaping interspecific divergence in mating signals in vertebrates , 2000, Behavioural Processes.
[69] K. Karino,et al. Heritability of male secondary sexual traits in feral guppies in Japan , 2001, Journal of Ethology.
[70] J. Endler,et al. FEMALE GUPPIES AGREE TO DIFFER: PHENOTYPIC AND GENETIC VARIATION IN MATE‐CHOICE BEHAVIOR AND THE CONSEQUENCES FOR SEXUAL SELECTION , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[71] J. W. Boughman,et al. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks , 2001, Nature.
[72] G. Hill,et al. Plumage Color as a Composite Trait: Developmental and Functional Integration of Sexual Ornamentation , 2001, The American Naturalist.
[73] J. L. Tomkins,et al. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox , 2001, Nature.
[74] T. Tregenza,et al. Sexual selection and speciation. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[75] D. Schluter. Ecology and the origin of species. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[76] J. Endler,et al. DIRECT AND INDIRECT SEXUAL SELECTION AND QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF MALE TRAITS IN GUPPIES (POECILIA RETICULATA) , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[77] K. Hughes,et al. A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit? , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[78] A. Møller,et al. Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[79] J. Endler. Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes , 1983, Environmental Biology of Fishes.