Variation in female mate choice within guppy populations: population divergence, multiple ornaments and the maintenance of polymorphism.

The evolutionary significance of variation in mate choice behaviour is currently a subject of some debate and considerable empirical study. Here, I review recent work on variation within and among guppy (Poecilia reticulata) populations in female mate choice and mating preferences. Empirical results demonstrate that there is substantial variation within and among populations in female responsiveness and choosiness, and much of this variation is genetic. Evidence for variation in preference functions also exists, but this appears to be more equivocal and the relative importance of genetic variation is less clear cut. In the second half of this review I discuss the potential significance of this variation to three important evolutionary issues: the presence of multiple male ornaments, the maintenance of polymorphism and divergence in mate recognition among populations. Studies of genetic variation in mate choice within populations indicate that females have complex, multivariate preferences that are able to evolve independently to some extent. These findings suggest that the presence of multiple male ornaments may be due to multiple female mating preferences. The extreme polymorphism in male guppy colour patterns demands explanation, yet no single satisfactory explanation has yet emerged. I review several old ideas and a few new ones in order to identify the most promising potential explanations for future empirical testing. Among these are negative frequency dependent selection, environmental heterogeneity coupled with gene flow, and genetic constraints. Last, I review the relative extent of within and among-population variation in mate choice and mating preferences in order to assess why guppies have not speciated despite a history of isolation and divergence. I argue that variation within guppy populations in mate choice and enhanced mating success of new immigrants to a pool are major impediments to population divergence of the magnitude that would be required for speciation to occur.

[1]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .

[2]  Ø. Winge,et al.  Colour inheritance and sex determination in Lebistes , 1947, Heredity.

[3]  H. Waterbolk,et al.  Ethological Studies On Lebistes Reticulatus (Peters) , 1955 .

[4]  J. V. Iersel,et al.  Preening of Two Tern Species. a Study On Displacement Activities , 1958 .

[5]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1961 .

[6]  N. Liley Ethological isolating mechanisms in four sympatric species of poeciliid fishes , 1966 .

[7]  J. A. Farr MALE RARITY OR NOVELTY, FEMALE CHOICE BEHAVIOR, AND SEXUAL SELECTION IN THE GUPPY, POECILIA RETICULATA PETERS (PISCES: POECILIIDAE) , 1977, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  L. Ehrman,et al.  Rare male mating advantage , 1978, Nature.

[9]  J. Endler A Predator’s View of Animal Color Patterns , 1978 .

[10]  N. Liley,et al.  A sexual pheromone in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata (Peters) , 1979 .

[11]  J. A. Farr Social Behavior Patterns as Determinants of Reproductive Success in the Guppy, Poecilia Reticulata Peters (Pisces: Poeciliidae) an Experimental Study of the Effects of Intermale Competition, Female Choice, and Sexual Selection , 1980 .

[12]  J. Endler NATURAL SELECTION ON COLOR PATTERNS IN POECILIA RETICULATA , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[13]  R. Lande Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  P. Taylor,et al.  The lek paradox is not resolved , 1982 .

[15]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Mechanisms for frequency-dependent mating success , 1984 .

[16]  J. A. Farr,et al.  The inheritance of quantitative fitness traits in guppies, Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae). II. tests for inbreeding effects , 1984, Heredity.

[17]  J. Endler Predation, light intensity and courtship behaviour in Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae) , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  L. Partridge,et al.  The rare-male effect: what is its evolutionary significance? , 1988, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[19]  L. Partridge Frequency-dependent mating preferences in female fruitflies? , 1989, Behavior genetics.

[20]  N. Barton,et al.  Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know? , 1989, Annual review of genetics.

[21]  J. Endler,et al.  Correlated Evolution of Female Mating Preferences and Male Color Patterns in the Guppy Poecilia reticulata , 1990, Science.

[22]  T. Guilford,et al.  Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek , 1991, Nature.

[24]  J. Endler Variation in the appearance of guppy color patterns to guppies and their predators under different visual conditions , 1991, Vision Research.

[25]  F. Breden,et al.  MITOCHONDRIAL DNA SEQUENCE VARIATION AMONG NATURAL POPULATIONS OF THE TRINIDAD GUPPY, POECILIA RETICULATA , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  J. Endler Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[27]  A. Houde Sex-linked heritability of a sexually selected character in a natural population of Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae) (guppies) , 1992, Heredity.

[28]  A. Magurran,et al.  Genetic consequences of an artificial introduction of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) in N. Trinidad , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  J. Endler Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. , 1993, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[30]  M. Ryan,et al.  SPECIES RECOGNITION AND SEXUAL SELECTION AS A UNITARY PROBLEM IN ANIMAL COMMUNICATION , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[31]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Evolution of multiple sexual preferences by Fisher’s runaway process of sexual selection , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  A. Pomiankowski,et al.  Linked sexiness and choosiness. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  A. Houde Effect of artificial selection on male colour patterns on mating preference of female guppies , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  F. Breden,et al.  Test of indirect models of selection in the Trinidad guppy , 1994, Heredity.

[35]  L. Dugatkin,et al.  Variability and repeatability of female mating preference in the guppy , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  J. Endler,et al.  GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN FEMALE PREFERENCES FOR MALE TRAITS IN POECILIA RETICULATA , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  R. Brooks,et al.  Female choice in a feral guppy population: are there multiple cues? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  Honest advertisement of multiple qualities using multiple signals , 1995 .

[39]  A. Pomiankowski,et al.  The genetic basis of female mate preferences , 1995 .

[40]  J. Endler Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[41]  A. Møller,et al.  A resolution of the lek paradox , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  Multiple Displays in Animal Communication:`Backup Signals' and `Multiple Messages' , 1996 .

[43]  R. Brooks Copying and the repeatability of mate choice , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[44]  L. Rowe,et al.  The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  John A. Allen,et al.  Protective polymorphism in populations of computer-simulated moth-like prey , 1997 .

[46]  A. Kodric-Brown,et al.  Repeatability of female choice in the guppy: response to live and videotaped males , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[47]  M. Petrie,et al.  VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[48]  A. Houde Sex, Color, and Mate Choice in Guppies , 1998 .

[49]  A. Magurran Population differentiation without speciation , 1998 .

[50]  A. Bond,et al.  Apostatic selection by blue jays produces balanced polymorphism in virtual prey , 1998, Nature.

[51]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Runaway ornament diversity caused by Fisherian sexual selection. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  J A Endler,et al.  Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[53]  A. Hoffmann Is the heritability for courtship and mating speed in Drosophila (fruit fly) low? , 1999, Heredity.

[54]  W. Cade,et al.  Correlated-response-to-selection experiments designed to test for a genetic correlation between female preferences and male traits yield biased results , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[55]  J. Godin,et al.  Geographic variation in multiple paternity within natural populations of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  Widemo,et al.  Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[57]  R. Brooks,et al.  Multiple Sexual Ornaments Coevolve with Multiple Mating Preferences , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[58]  A. Magurran,et al.  Familiarity breeds contempt in guppies , 1999, Nature.

[59]  K. Hughes,et al.  Familiarity leads to female mate preference for novel males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[60]  D. Millie,et al.  Carotenoid limitation of sexual coloration along an environmental gradient in guppies , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[61]  C. Rowe Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[62]  P. J. Moore,et al.  Balancing sexual selection through opposing mate choice and male competition , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[63]  A. Magurran,et al.  Gene flow in Trinidadian guppies , 2000 .

[64]  W. Cade,et al.  Sexual selection and speciation in field crickets. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  A. Magurran,et al.  Multiple benefits of multiple mating in guppies. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[66]  A. Magurran,et al.  Evidence for sperm transfer during sneaky mating in wild Trinidadian guppies , 2000 .

[67]  R. Brooks Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival , 2000, Nature.

[68]  M. Ptacek The role of mating preferences in shaping interspecific divergence in mating signals in vertebrates , 2000, Behavioural Processes.

[69]  K. Karino,et al.  Heritability of male secondary sexual traits in feral guppies in Japan , 2001, Journal of Ethology.

[70]  J. Endler,et al.  FEMALE GUPPIES AGREE TO DIFFER: PHENOTYPIC AND GENETIC VARIATION IN MATE‐CHOICE BEHAVIOR AND THE CONSEQUENCES FOR SEXUAL SELECTION , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[71]  J. W. Boughman,et al.  Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks , 2001, Nature.

[72]  G. Hill,et al.  Plumage Color as a Composite Trait: Developmental and Functional Integration of Sexual Ornamentation , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[73]  J. L. Tomkins,et al.  Towards a resolution of the lek paradox , 2001, Nature.

[74]  T. Tregenza,et al.  Sexual selection and speciation. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[75]  D. Schluter Ecology and the origin of species. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[76]  J. Endler,et al.  DIRECT AND INDIRECT SEXUAL SELECTION AND QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF MALE TRAITS IN GUPPIES (POECILIA RETICULATA) , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[77]  K. Hughes,et al.  A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit? , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[78]  A. Møller,et al.  Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[79]  J. Endler Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes , 1983, Environmental Biology of Fishes.