The impact of enterprise architecture management on information systems architecture complexity

ABSTRACT Significant investments in information systems (IS) over the past decades have led to increasingly complex IS architectures in organisations, which are difficult to understand, operate, and maintain. We investigate this development and associated challenges through a conceptual model that distinguishes four constituent elements of IS architecture complexity by differentiating technological from organisational aspects and structural from dynamic aspects. Building on this conceptualisation, we hypothesise relations between these four IS architecture complexity constructs and investigate their impact on architectural outcomes (i.e., efficiency, flexibility, transparency, and predictability). Using survey data from 249 IS managers, we test our model through a partial least squares (PLS) approach to structural equation modelling (SEM). We find that organisational complexity drives technological complexity and that structural complexity drives dynamic complexity. We also demonstrate that increasing IS architecture complexity has a significant negative impact on efficiency, flexibility, transparency, and predictability. Finally, we show that enterprise architecture management (EAM) helps to offset these negative effects by acting as a moderator in the relation between organisational and technological IS architecture complexity. Thus, organisations without adequate EAM are likely to face large increases in technological complexity due to increasing organisational complexity, whereas organisations with adequate EAM exhibit no such relation.

[1]  Sean W. Hansen,et al.  Electronic Health Records and the Logics of Care: Complementarity and Conflict in the U.S. Healthcare System , 2020, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Martin Mocker,et al.  How to Avoid Enterprise Systems Landscape Complexity , 2020, MIS Q. Executive.

[3]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Complexity and Information Systems Research in the Emerging Digital World , 2020 .

[4]  Robert Winter,et al.  The Evolution of Information Systems Architecture: An Agent-Based Simulation Model , 2020, MIS Q..

[5]  Stephan Aier,et al.  Dynamics of Control Mechanisms in Enterprise Architecture Management: A Sensemaking Perspective , 2018, ICIS.

[6]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Introduction - Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age , 2018, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Robert Winter,et al.  The Institutional Logic of Harmonization: Local Versus Global Perspectives , 2018, EEWC.

[8]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  On the Fintech Revolution: Interpreting the Forces of Innovation, Disruption, and Transformation in Financial Services , 2017, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Robert Winter,et al.  Revisiting the Impact of Information Systems Architecture Complexity: A Complex Adaptive Systems Perspective , 2017, ICIS.

[10]  Torsten Eymann,et al.  Digitalization: Opportunity and Challenge for the Business and Information Systems Engineering Community , 2017, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[11]  Samuli Pekkola,et al.  Using enterprise architecture artefacts in an organisation , 2017, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Matthias Lange,et al.  An empirical analysis of the factors and measures of Enterprise Architecture Management success , 2016, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Stephan Aier,et al.  What Drives Application Portfolio Complexity? An Empirical Analysis of Application Portfolio Cost Drivers at a Global Automotive Company , 2016, 2016 IEEE 18th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI).

[14]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  The Mirroring Hypothesis: Theory, Evidence and Exceptions , 2016 .

[15]  W. Alec Cram,et al.  Information Systems Control: A Review and Framework for Emerging Information Systems Processes , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Ulrich Remus,et al.  Control Configuration and Control Enactment in Information Systems Projects: Review and Expanded Theoretical Framework , 2016, MIS Q..

[17]  Karim Baïna,et al.  Enterprise Architecture Complexity Component Based on Archimate Language , 2015, UNet.

[18]  Robert Winter,et al.  On the Role of Complexity for Guiding Enterprise Transformations , 2015, EEWC.

[19]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  Understanding the Dynamics of Service-Oriented Architecture Implementation , 2015, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Peter Weill,et al.  Revisiting complexity in the digital age , 2015, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[21]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  Generalization in IS research: a critique of the conflicting positions of Lee & Baskerville and Tsang & Williams , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[22]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Looking Toward the Future of IT-Business Strategic Alignment through the Past: A Meta-Analysis , 2014, MIS Q..

[23]  Robert Winter,et al.  Architectural Thinking , 2014, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[24]  Dirceu da Silva,et al.  Modelagem de Equações Estruturais com Utilização do Smartpls , 2014 .

[25]  Sven Laumer,et al.  Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions , 2014, Information Systems Frontiers.

[26]  Bendik Bygstad,et al.  The Generative Mechanisms of Digital Infrastructure Evolution , 2013, MIS Q..

[27]  R. Law,et al.  A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) , 2013 .

[28]  Yu Cong,et al.  On Information Systems Complexity and Vulnerability , 2013, J. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Jörg H. Mayer,et al.  Self-Service Management Support Systems - There's an App for That , 2013, DESRIST.

[30]  Christine Legner,et al.  Enterprise Architecture Principles In Research And Practice: Insights From An Exploratory Analysis , 2013, ECIS.

[31]  Thomas Widjaja,et al.  Complexity In Enterprise Architectures - Conceptualization And Introduction Of A Measure From A System Theoretic Perspective , 2013, ECIS.

[32]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Editorial - Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance , 2013 .

[33]  Detlef Schoder,et al.  Enterprise architecture management and its role in corporate strategic management , 2013, Information Systems and e-Business Management.

[34]  Peter Buxmann,et al.  Heterogeneity in IT Landscapes and Monopoly Power of Firms: A Model to Quantify Heterogeneity , 2012, ICIS.

[35]  Ralph Foorthuis,et al.  Project Compliance with Enterprise Architecture , 2012 .

[36]  D. Straub,et al.  Editor's comments: a critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly , 2012 .

[37]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  Towards the improved treatment of generalization of knowledge claims in IS research: drawing general conclusions from samples , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Florian Matthes,et al.  Towards an Agile Design of the Enterprise Architecture Management Function , 2011, 2011 IEEE 15th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops.

[39]  Alexander Verbraeck,et al.  Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: The TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework , 2011 .

[40]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques , 2011, MIS Q..

[41]  Bin Gu,et al.  Environmental Uncertainty and IT Infrastructure Governance: A Curvilinear Relationship , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  Henderik Alex Proper,et al.  Architecture Principles - The Cornerstones of Enterprise Architecture , 2011, The Enterprise Engineering Series.

[43]  Peter Buxmann,et al.  Outcomes and success factors of enterprise IT architecture management: empirical insight from the international financial services industry , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Robert Winter,et al.  Understanding Enterprise Architecture Management Design - An Empirical Analysis , 2011, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[45]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  Coping with Complexity, Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Risk Governance: A Synthesis , 2011, AMBIO.

[46]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Structural modeling of heterogeneous data with partial least squares , 2010 .

[47]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Complementarities Between Organizational IT Architecture and Governance Structure , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[49]  Mathias Ekstedt,et al.  The Effect of IT Governance Maturity on IT Governance Performance , 2010, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[50]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[51]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process , 2009, ECIS.

[52]  Joana G. Geraldi,et al.  What complexity assessments can tell us about projects: dialogue between conception and perception , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[53]  R. Winter,et al.  Virtual Decoupling for IT/Business Alignment – Conceptual Foundations, Architecture Design and Implementation Example , 2009, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[54]  Martin Mocker,et al.  What Is Complex About 273 Applications? Untangling Application Architecture Complexity in a Case of European Investment Banking , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[55]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Explaining information systems change: a punctuated socio-technical change model , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[56]  Robert Lagerström,et al.  A Bayesian network for IT governance performance prediction , 2008, ICEC.

[57]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Robert Winter,et al.  Enterprise architecture governance: the need for a business-to-IT approach , 2008, SAC '08.

[59]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Risk, Complexity and ICT , 2007 .

[60]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Training, Technical Complexity, and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation , 2007, MIS Q..

[61]  R. France,et al.  Model-driven Development of Complex Software: A Research Roadmap , 2007, Future of Software Engineering (FOSE '07).

[62]  Daniel M. Yellin,et al.  Using Enterprise Architecture Standards in Managing Information Technology , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[63]  Yasmin Merali,et al.  Complexity and Information Systems: the emergent domain , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[64]  Robert Winter,et al.  Essential Layers, Artifacts, and Dependencies of Enterprise Architecture , 2006, 2006 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW'06).

[65]  Qing Chang,et al.  How Low Should You Go? Low Response Rates and the Validity of Inference in IS Questionnaire Research , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[66]  Hind Benbya,et al.  Toward a complexity theory of information systems development , 2006, Inf. Technol. People.

[67]  Weidong Xia,et al.  Complexity of Information Systems Development Projects: Conceptualization and Measurement Development , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[68]  Ronald E. Giachetti,et al.  A measure of agility as the complexity of the enterprise system , 2004 .

[69]  Nigel P. Melville,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[70]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[71]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Creating a Strategic IT Architecture Competency: Learning in Stages , 2003, MIS Q. Executive.

[72]  Pieter M. A. Ribbers,et al.  Program Management and Complexity of ERP Implementations , 2002 .

[73]  Judy E. Scott,et al.  Managing risks in enterprise systems implementations , 2002, CACM.

[74]  David A. Harrison,et al.  Enhancing Survey Response Rates at the Executive Level: Are Employee- or Consumer-Level Techniques Effective? , 2002 .

[75]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  An Integrative Contingency Model of Software Project Risk Management , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[76]  David Baccarini,et al.  The concept of project complexity—a review , 1996 .

[77]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis , 1995 .

[78]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  The Relationship Between User Participation and User Satisfaction: An Investigation of Four Contingency Factors , 1994, MIS Q..

[79]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models (3rd ed.). , 1992 .

[80]  P. Attewell.  Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing , 1992 .

[81]  Kathleen Foley Curley,et al.  An Applied Framework for Classifying the Complexity of Knowledge-Based Systems , 1991, MIS Q..

[82]  Jan-Bernd Lohmöller,et al.  Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares , 1989 .

[83]  David W. Gerbing,et al.  An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment , 1988 .

[84]  Iris Vessey,et al.  The Effect of User Involvement on System Success: A Contingency Approach , 1988, MIS Q..

[85]  J. Zachman.  A Framework for Information Systems Architecture (Abstract of Tutorial) , 1987, ER.

[86]  R. Wood.  Task complexity: Definition of the construct , 1986 .

[87]  From Enterprise Architecture To It Governance Elements Of Effective It Management , 2022 .

[88]  Bart van den Hooff,et al.  Business IT Alignment through the Lens of Complexity Science , 2016, ICIS.

[89]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[90]  Eric van Heck,et al.  Business-Driven IT Transformation at Royal Philips: Shedding Light on (Un)Rewarded Complexity , 2015, ICIS.

[91]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Hummel's Digital Transformation Toward Omnichannel Retailing: Key Lessons Learned , 2015, MIS Q. Executive.

[92]  Jan Muntermann,et al.  Complexity in is Programs: a Delphi Study , 2014, ECIS.

[93]  Narayan Ramasubbu,et al.  Orchestrating Service Innovation Using Design Moves: The Dynamics of Fit between Service and Enterprise IT Architectures , 2014, ICIS.

[94]  Florian Matthes,et al.  Adopting Notions of Complexity for Enterprise Architecture Management , 2014, AMCIS.

[95]  Bendik Bygstad,et al.  European Conference on Information Systems ( ECIS ) 5-15-2012 ICT ARCHITECTURE AND PROJECT RISK IN INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL SETTINGS , 2013 .

[96]  Straub,et al.  Editor's Comments: An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Administrative and Social Science Research , 2011 .

[97]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Admnistrative and Social Science Research , 2011 .

[98]  Lutz Kolbe,et al.  Towards Managing IT Complexity: An IT Governance Framework to Measure Business-IT Responsibility Sharing and Structural IT Organization , 2011, AMCIS.

[99]  Kerstin Liehr-Gobbers,et al.  Chapter 29 Evaluation of Structural Equation Models Using the Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach , 2010 .

[100]  David Stewart,et al.  Focus groups: Theory and practice, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[101]  Terry Halpin,et al.  Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems , 2006, International handbooks on information systems.

[102]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[103]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Testing Moderating Effects in PLS Path Models. An Illustration of Available Procedures , 2005 .

[104]  Steven L. Alter,et al.  The Work System Method for Understanding Information Systems and Information Systems Research , 2002, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[105]  Peter Bernus,et al.  Architectures of Information Systems , 1998 .

[106]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[107]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[108]  M. E. Conway.  HOW DO COMMITTEES INVENT , 1967 .