The Delphi process – an expert‐based approach to ecological modelling in data‐poor environments

Resource managers are involved in difficult decisions that affect rare species and habitats but often lack relevant ecological knowledge and experience. Ecological models are increasingly being looked to as a means of assisting the decision-making process, but very often the data are missing or are unsuited to empirical modelling. This paper describes the development and application of the Delphi approach to develop a decision support tool for wildlife conservation and management. The Delphi process is an expert-based approach to decision support that can be used as a means for predicting outcomes in situations where 'absolute' or 'objective' models are unavailable or compromised by lack of appropriate data. The method aims to develop consensus between experts over several rounds of deliberation on the assumption that combining the expertise of several individuals will provide more reliable results than consulting one or two individuals. In this paper the approach is used to engineer soft knowledge on the conservation requirements of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus, an endangered woodland grouse, into a model that can be used by forests managers to improve the quality of forest habitat for capercaillie over extensive commercial forest areas. This paper concludes with a discussion of the potential advantages and disadvantages of Delphi and other soft knowledge approaches to ecological modelling and conservation management.

[1]  D. Baines,et al.  Abundance and distribution of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus in Scotland 1992–1994 , 1998 .

[2]  K. Mengersen,et al.  The power of expert opinion in ecological models using Bayesian methods: impact of grazing on birds , 2005 .

[3]  Gary J. Roloff,et al.  Evaluating reliability of habitat suitability index models , 1999 .

[4]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Analyzing consistency of experts' judgments: Case of assessing forest biodiversity , 1998 .

[5]  Mervyn Thomas,et al.  A Novel Bayesian Approach to Assessing Impacts of Rain Forest Logging , 1996 .

[6]  David H. Gustafson,et al.  Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes , 1976 .

[7]  Ilse Storch,et al.  Habitat selection by capercaillie in summer and autumn: Is bilberry important? , 1993, Oecologia.

[8]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  A heuristic optimization method for forest planning and decision making , 1993 .

[9]  David Baines,et al.  Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus in Scotland - demography of a declining population , 2008 .

[10]  R. Moss,et al.  Evaluation of capercaillie habitat , 1992 .

[11]  B. Marcot,et al.  Using Bayesian belief networks to evaluate fish and wildlife population viability under land management alternatives from an environmental impact statement , 2001 .

[12]  Rowena H. W. Langston,et al.  Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus abundance and habitat use in Scotland, in winter 1998–99 , 2002 .

[13]  K. R. Marshall,et al.  Optimising capercailzie habitat in commercial forestry plantations , 2004 .

[14]  Ilse Storch,et al.  On Spatial Resolution in Habitat Models: Can Small-scale Forest Structure Explain Capercaillie Numbers? , 2002 .

[15]  TANYS V. UHMANN,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A HABITAT SUITABILITY INDEX MODEL FOR BURROWING OWLS IN THE EASTERN CANADIAN PRAIRIES , 2008 .

[16]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  A method for estimating the suitability function of wildlife habitat for forest planning on the basis of expertise , 1993 .

[17]  Johnie H. Crance,et al.  Guidelines for Using the Delphi Technique to Develop Habitat Suitability Index Curves , 1987 .

[18]  D. Macmillan,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of woodland ecosystem restoration , 1998 .