Deep Learning for Multi-task Plant Phenotyping

Plant phenotyping has continued to pose a challenge to computer vision for many years. There is a particular demand to accurately quantify images of crops, and the natural variability and structure of these plants presents unique difficulties. Recently, machine learning approaches have shown impressive results in many areas of computer vision, but these rely on large datasets that are at present not available for crops. We present a new dataset, called ACID, that provides hundreds of accurately annotated images of wheat spikes and spikelets, along with image level class annotation. We then present a deep learning approach capable of accurately localising wheat spikes and spikelets, despite the varied nature of this dataset. As well as locating features, our network offers near perfect counting accuracy for spikes (95.91%) and spikelets (99.66%). We also extend the network to perform simultaneous classification of images, demonstrating the power of multi-task deep architectures for plant phenotyping. We hope that our dataset will be useful to researchers in continued improvement of plant and crop phenotyping. With this in mind, alongside the dataset we will make all code and trained models available online.

[1]  F. Cointault,et al.  In‐field Triticum aestivum ear counting using colour‐texture image analysis , 2008 .

[2]  Hanno Scharr,et al.  Machine Learning for Plant Phenotyping Needs Image Processing. , 2016, Trends in plant science.

[3]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Machine Learning for High-Throughput Stress Phenotyping in Plants. , 2016, Trends in plant science.

[4]  Georgios Tzimiropoulos,et al.  Human Pose Estimation via Convolutional Part Heatmap Regression , 2016, ECCV.

[5]  A. Hills,et al.  EZ-Rhizo: integrated software for the fast and accurate measurement of root system architecture. , 2009, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[6]  Nj Halse,et al.  Effects of Temperature on Spikelet Number of Wheat , 1974 .

[7]  Guillaume Lobet,et al.  Image Analysis in Plant Sciences: Publish Then Perish. , 2017, Trends in plant science.

[8]  Christian Bauckhage,et al.  Metro Maps of Plant Disease Dynamics—Automated Mining of Differences Using Hyperspectral Images , 2015, PloS one.

[9]  M. P. Reynolds,et al.  Awns reduce grain number to increase grain size and harvestable yield in irrigated and rainfed spring wheat , 2016, Journal of experimental botany.

[10]  A. Blum,et al.  Photosynthesis and Transpiration in Leaves and Ears of Wheat and Barley Varieties , 1985 .

[11]  Tony P. Pridmore,et al.  Deep machine learning provides state-of-the-art performance in image-based plant phenotyping , 2016, bioRxiv.

[12]  S. Ninomiya,et al.  Automated characterization of flowering dynamics in rice using field-acquired time-series RGB images , 2015, Plant Methods.

[13]  Marco Mariotti,et al.  Sowing date affect spikelet number and grain yield of durum wheat , 2009 .

[14]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation , 2013, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[15]  Pouria Sadeghi-Tehran,et al.  Automated Method to Determine Two Critical Growth Stages of Wheat: Heading and Flowering , 2017, Front. Plant Sci..

[16]  Tony Pridmore,et al.  High-Throughput Quantification of Root Growth Using a Novel Image-Analysis Tool1[C][W] , 2009, Plant Physiology.

[17]  Jia Deng,et al.  Stacked Hourglass Networks for Human Pose Estimation , 2016, ECCV.

[18]  Yong Li,et al.  Plant Density Effect on Grain Number and Weight of Two Winter Wheat Cultivars at Different Spikelet and Grain Positions , 2016, PloS one.

[19]  Shengping Zhang,et al.  Computer vision cracks the leaf code , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Steven R. Evett,et al.  Development of a Wireless Computer Vision Instrument to Detect Biotic Stress in Wheat , 2014, Sensors.

[21]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[22]  Philip H. S. Torr,et al.  Recurrent Instance Segmentation , 2015, ECCV.

[23]  Ben C. Stöver,et al.  LeafNet: A computer vision system for automatic plant species identification , 2017, Ecol. Informatics.

[24]  S. Tsaftaris,et al.  Learning to Count Leaves in Rosette Plants , 2015 .

[25]  Jean-Michel Pape,et al.  Utilizing machine learning approaches to improve the prediction of leaf counts and individual leaf segmentation of rosette plant images , 2015 .

[26]  J. Borevitz,et al.  Deep Phenotyping: Deep Learning for Temporal Phenotype/Genotype Classification , 2017, bioRxiv.