Turning simple span into complex span: Time for decay or interference from distractors?

We investigated the effects of the duration and type of to-be-articulated distractors during encoding of a verbal list into short-term memory (STM). Distractors and to-be-remembered items alternated during list presentation, as in the complex-span task that underlies much of working-memory research. According to an interference model of STM, known as serial order in a box (SOB; Farrell & Lewandowsky, 2002), additional repeated articulations of the same word between list items should cause minimal further disruption of encoding into STM even though the retention interval for early list items is increased. SOB also predicts that the articulation of several different distractor items should lead to much enhanced disruption if the distractor interval is increased. Those predictions were qualitatively confirmed in 4 experiments that found that it is the type of distractors, not their total duration, that determines the success of encoding a list into STM. The results pose a challenge to temporal models of complex-span performance, such as the time-based resource sharing model (Barrouillet, Bernardin, & Camos, 2004). The results add to a growing body of evidence that memory for the short term is not exclusively governed by purely temporal processes.

[1]  Michael Wilson,et al.  MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00 , 1988 .

[2]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  A temporal ratio model of memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[3]  Lisa M. Nimmo,et al.  From brief gaps to very long pauses: temporal isolation does not benefit serial recall. , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  G J Hitch,et al.  On the interpretation of working memory span in adults , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[5]  R. Engle,et al.  On the division of short-term and working memory: an examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Traveling economically through memory space: Characterizing output order in memory for serial order , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[7]  Stephen A. Ritz,et al.  Distinctive features, categorical perception, and probability learning: some applications of a neural model , 1977 .

[8]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  When Temporal Isolation Benefits Memory for Serial Order. , 2008 .

[9]  Satoru Saito,et al.  On the nature of forgetting and the processing–storage relationship in reading span performance ☆ , 2004 .

[10]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  When does rapid presentation enhance digit span , 1984 .

[11]  Alan Baddeley,et al.  Disruption of Verbal Stm by Irrelevant Speech, Articulatory Suppression, and Manual Tapping: Do they have a Common Source? , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Temporal isolation does not facilitate forward serial recall—or does it? , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[13]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Time and cognitive load in working memory. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Karl Christoph Klauer,et al.  Working memory and changing-state hypothesis. , 1999 .

[15]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[16]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Visual and spatial working memory are not that dissociated after all: a time-based resource-sharing account. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  D. C. Lecompte,et al.  An irrelevant speech effect with repeated and continuous background speech , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  David J. Therriault,et al.  A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence , 2002 .

[19]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  No evidence for temporal decay in working memory. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Interference between storage and processing in working memory: Feature overwriting, not similarity-based competition , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[21]  W J Macken,et al.  Functional characteristics of the inner voice and the inner ear: single or double agency? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Michael Wilson.  MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 2001 .

[23]  D. Norris,et al.  The primacy model: a new model of immediate serial recall. , 1998, Psychological review.

[24]  Articulatory suppression and the irrelevantspeech effect in short-term memory: Does the locus of suppression matter? , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Functional equivalence of verbal and spatial information in serial short-term memory. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  The phonological store of working memory: is it phonological and is it a store? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Short‐term and working memory: Past, progress, and prospects , 2005, Memory.

[29]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  SIMPLE: Further Applications of A Local Distinctiveness Model of Memory , 2006 .

[30]  D. Bamber.  State-trace analysis: A method of testing simple theories of causation , 1979 .

[31]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Interference-Based Forgetting in Verbal Short-Term Memory. , 2008 .

[32]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Timeless memory: Evidence against temporal distinctiveness models of short-term memory for serial order , 2006 .

[33]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  Forgetting in immediate serial recall: decay, temporal distinctiveness, or interference? , 2008, Psychological review.

[34]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  Simon Farrell,et al.  Mixed-List Phonological Similarity Effects in Delayed Serial Recall. , 2006 .

[36]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Time-related decay or interference-based forgetting in working memory? , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  H. Pashler.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Rethinking Speed Theories of Cognitive Development , 2006, Psychological science.

[39]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Time constraints and resource sharing in adults' working memory spans. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Time does not cause forgetting in short-term serial recall , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Distinctiveness revisited: Unpredictable temporal isolation does not benefit short-term serial recall of heard or seen events , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[42]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Interference in verbal working memory: Distinguishing similarity-based confusion, feature overwriting, and feature migration , 2008 .

[43]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[44]  G. Loftus,et al.  Linear theory, dimensional theory, and the face-inversion effect. , 2004, Psychological review.

[45]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  No temporal decay in verbal short-term memory , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Simon Farrell,et al.  Phonological Similarity in Serial Recall: Constraints on Theories of Memory. , 2008 .

[47]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  Picturing repeated measures: Comments on Loftus, Morrison, and others , 1996 .

[48]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Evidence for time-based models of free recall , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[49]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  Distinctiveness and very short-term serial position effects. , 1996, Memory.

[50]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[51]  Randall W Engle,et al.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[52]  N. Burgess.  Memory for Serial Order : A Network Model of the Phonological Loop and its Timing , 1999 .

[53]  Vinciane Gaillard,et al.  Working memory span development: a time-based resource-sharing model account. , 2009, Developmental psychology.

[54]  Simon Farrell,et al.  Short-Term Memory: New Data and a Model , 2008 .

[55]  Gerald Tehan,et al.  Phonological Similarity and Trace Degradation in the Serial Recall Task: When CAT helps RAT, but not MAN , 1999 .

[56]  D. J. Murray.  The role of speech responses in short-term memory. , 1967, Canadian journal of psychology.

[57]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  The effects of processing time and processing rate on forgetting in working memory: Testing four models of the complex span paradigm , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[58]  J. S. Nairne.  A feature model of immediate memory , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[59]  Simon Farrell,et al.  End Anchoring in Short-Term Order Memory. , 2009 .

[60]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[61]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[62]  Murray Dj.  The role of speech responses in short-term memory. , 1967 .

[63]  N. Meiran,et al.  On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[64]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.