There is growing recognition that in order to further improve safety performance, attention needs to be given beyond the immediate working conditions and worker actions. A systems approach to construction safety enables considering: multiple project elements simultaneously; connections between different elements; and all system elements affected by safety risk. This paper describes recent and current research to conceptualize a typical building project in terms of connections between workers, activities, and design elements, and to verify and analyze impacts of the design and worker interactions on worker safety. Prior research provides the basis for a network tying the design elements, construction activities, and work crews on a typical building project together along with the extent of interaction between each of the system elements in terms of safety. In conjunction with this systems approach, the researchers propose a concept for viewing and managing construction safety through four different types of connections, or "degrees of connectivity," between the different workers, activities, and design elements in the system. The degrees of connectivity are defined as: interacting with the design element during its construction (DoC #1); interacting with the design element in its final form to attach another component to it (DoC #2) or by working in the vicinity of it (DoC #3); and indirectly interacting with the design element through another worker (DoC #4). To support and verify the presence of the concept in practice, the researchers conducted a survey of construction personnel. The survey results confirm that the four different degrees of connectivity are present and felt during construction operations, and indicate that attention should be given to all design elements, activities, and workers to which a worker is "connected". According to the survey respondents, DoC's #1 and #2 are recognized as the most widely present on construction sites. Eighty percent of the respondents believe that the design element has a moderate or greater impact on worker safety while it is being constructed. These initial research steps provide the starting point for continuing study that aims to develop and demonstrate the degrees of connectivity concept linking workers and design elements, with the goal of understanding how to design a project and work operations in order to improve safety during construction.
[1]
Jimmie Hinze,et al.
Viability of Designing for Construction Worker Safety
,
2005
.
[2]
W. A. Kerr,et al.
Accident proneness of factory departments.
,
1950,
The Journal of applied psychology.
[3]
A. Roy Duff,et al.
Discussion of “Identifying Root Causes of Construction Accidents” by Akhmad Suraji and A. Roy Duff
,
2001
.
[4]
Timothy R Driscoll,et al.
The role of design issues in work-related fatal injury in Australia.
,
2008,
Journal of safety research.
[5]
H. W. Heinrich,et al.
Industrial Accident Prevention: a Scientific Approach
,
1951
.
[6]
Alistair G.F. Gibb,et al.
Construction accident causality: learning from different countries and differing consequences
,
2014
.
[7]
Zahra Jabbarani Torghabeh,et al.
Ajor Theories of Construction Accident Causation Models : a Literature Review
,
2012
.
[8]
Tariq S. Abdelhamid,et al.
Identifying Root Causes of Construction Accidents
,
2001
.
[9]
Paul Swuste,et al.
“You will only see it, if you understand it” or occupational risk prevention from a management perspective
,
2008
.
[10]
John A. Gambatese,et al.
Quantification and Assessment of Safety Risk in the Design of Multistory Buildings
,
2015
.
[11]
W. A. Kerr,et al.
Complementary Theories of Safety Psychology
,
1957
.
[12]
Dongping Fang,et al.
Understanding the Causation of Construction Workers’ Unsafe Behaviors Based on System Dynamics Modeling
,
2015
.
[13]
Michael Behm,et al.
Linking construction fatalities to the design for construction safety concept
,
2005
.
[14]
Gregory A. Howell,et al.
Systems Model of Construction Accident Causation
,
2005
.