Biomass feedstock preprocessing and long‐distance transportation logistics

Biomass‐based biofuels have gained attention because they are renewable energy sources that could facilitate energy independence and improve rural economic development. As biomass supply and biofuel demand areas are generally not geographically contiguous, the design of an efficient and effective biomass supply chain from biomass provision to biofuel distribution is critical to facilitate large‐scale biofuel development. This study compared the costs of supplying biomass using three alternative biomass preprocessing and densification technologies (pelletizing, briquetting, and grinding) and two alternative transportation modes (trucking and rail) for the design of a four‐stage biomass–biofuel supply chain in which biomass produced in Illinois is used to meet biofuel demands in either California or Illinois. The BioScope optimization model was applied to evaluate a four‐stage biomass–biofuel supply chain that includes biomass supply, centralized storage and preprocessing (CSP), biorefinery, and ethanol distribution. We examined the cost of 15 scenarios that included a combination of three biomass preprocessing technologies and five supply chain configurations. The findings suggested that the transportation costs for biomass would generally follow the pattern of coal transportation. Converting biomass to ethanol locally and shipping ethanol over long distances is most economical, similar to the existing grain‐based biofuel system. For the Illinois–California supply chain, moving ethanol is $0.24 gal−1 less costly than moving biomass even in densified form over long distances. The use of biomass pellets leads to lower overall costs of biofuel production for long‐distance transportation but to higher costs if used for short‐distance movement due to its high capital and processing costs. Supported by the supply chain optimization modeling, the cellulosic‐ethanol production and distribution costs of using Illinois feedstock to meet California demand are $0.08 gal−1 higher than that for meeting local Illinois demand.

[1]  K A Erikse,et al.  TRANSPORTATION OF U.S. GRAINS. A MODAL SHARE ANALYSIS, 1978-95 , 1992 .

[2]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  An integrated biogeochemical and economic analysis of bioenergy crops in the Midwestern United States , 2010 .

[3]  S. Polasky,et al.  Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  P. Flynn,et al.  Rail vs truck transport of biomass. , 2006, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[5]  Shahab Sokhansanj,et al.  Large‐scale production, harvest and logistics of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) – current technology and envisioning a mature technology , 2009 .

[6]  J. R. Hess,et al.  Cellulosic biomass feedstocks and logistics for ethanol production , 2007 .

[7]  Shahab Sokhansanj,et al.  ECONOMICS OF PRODUCING FUEL PELLETS FROM BIOMASS , 2006 .

[8]  Luis F. Rodriguez,et al.  GIS‐enabled biomass‐ethanol supply chain optimization: model development and Miscanthus application , 2013 .

[9]  John Brammer,et al.  Analysis of transport costs for energy crops for use in biomass pyrolysis plant networks , 2009 .

[10]  K. Ting,et al.  Influence of Feedstock Particle Size on Lignocellulose Conversion—A Review , 2011, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[11]  P. Badger,et al.  Use of mobile fast pyrolysis plants to densify biomass and reduce biomass handling costs—A preliminary assessment , 2006 .

[12]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Optimal configuration and combination of multiple lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks delivery to a biorefinery. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[13]  Ryan Davis,et al.  Process Design and Economics for Biochemical Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol: Dilute-Acid Pretreatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Corn Stover , 2011 .

[14]  Klaus D. Timmerhaus,et al.  Plant design and economics for chemical engineers , 1958 .

[15]  P. Flynn,et al.  The relative cost of biomass energy transport , 2007, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[16]  A. F. Turhollow,et al.  Biomass Densification - Cubing Operations and Costs for Corn Stover , 2004 .

[17]  Kuan Chong Ting,et al.  Energy requirement for lignocellulosic feedstock densifications in relation to particle physical properties, preheating, and binding agents , 2013 .

[18]  William Lane Austin,et al.  The Census of Agriculture , 1930 .

[19]  Marina R. Denicoff Ethanol Transportation Backgrounder , 2007 .

[20]  R. A. Kepner,et al.  Tub Grinder Performance with Crop and Forest Residues , 1982 .

[21]  Ken Campbell A Feasibility Study Guide for an Agricultural Biomass Pellet Company , 2007 .

[22]  W Michael Griffin,et al.  Modeling switchgrass derived cellulosic ethanol distribution in the United States. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Bryan Bals,et al.  Advanced Regional Biomass Processing Depots: a key to the logistical challenges of the cellulosic biofuel industry , 2011 .

[24]  Vernon A. Williams Surface Transportation Board , 2007 .