Multiple sclerosis impairs ability to detect abrupt appearance of a subliminal stimulus

Abstract Objectives: The study was designed to find evidence that brain electrical activity associated with processing the abrupt appearance or disappearance of a sensory stimulus differed in the presence and absence of the neuropathological changes that are characteristic of multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: A subliminal stimulus (electrical field) was applied, and the onset and offset responses from patients with MS were compared with the responses of study participants in two age- and gender-matched control groups, using a novel type of non-linear dynamical analysis that had been developed in earlier studies. Results: An onset response occurred in 27% of the patients with MS, compared with 85% in the control groups. Among the three patients who exhibited onset-induced changes in brain electrical activity, the average latency of the effect was less and the magnitude of the change was greater than the corresponding values in the control group. Discussion: Non-linear analysis of electroencephalograms recorded during the sudden presentation of a subliminal stimulus potentially could serve as the basis of a functional test to help diagnose MS. A larger cohort of patients with MS needs to be assessed to validate the results of this study.

[1]  S. Reingold,et al.  Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis , 1996, Neurology.

[2]  Karen O. Egiazarian,et al.  Measuring directional coupling between EEG sources , 2008, NeuroImage.

[3]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Symbiotic relationship between brain structure and dynamics , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[4]  D. Regan.  Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[5]  Clifton Frilot,et al.  Localization of electroreceptive function in rabbits , 2003, Physiology & Behavior.

[6]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Patches with Links: A Unified System for Processing Faces in the Macaque Temporal Lobe , 2008, Science.

[7]  Andrew A. Marino,et al.  The electric field is a sufficient physical determinant of the human magnetic sense. , 2009, International journal of radiation biology.

[8]  What is the validity of an “abnormal” evoked or event-related potential in MS? Auditory and visual evoked and event-related potentials in multiple sclerosis patients and normal subjects , 1992, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[9]  A. Keil,et al.  Aberrant brain dynamics in schizophrenia: delayed buildup and prolonged decay of the visual steady-state response. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  Koji Inui,et al.  Somatosensory off-response in humans: An MEG study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[11]  Lublin Fd,et al.  Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. , 1996 .

[12]  L. Leocani,et al.  Neurophysiological investigations in multiple sclerosis. , 2000, Current opinion in neurology.

[13]  Emi Tanaka,et al.  Common cortical responses evoked by appearance, disappearance and change of the human face , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Aminoff,et al.  Clinical correlations of serial somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis , 1985, Neurology.

[15]  A. Starr,et al.  The auditory P50 component to onset and offset of sound , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  Alireza Minagar,et al.  Gray Matter Involvement in Multiple Sclerosis: A New Window into Pathogenesis , 2003, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[17]  Clifton Frilot,et al.  Magnetosensory function in rats: Localization using positron emission tomography , 2009, Synapse.

[18]  Ş. Demirkaya,et al.  Is optical coherence tomography really a new biomarker candidate in multiple sclerosis?--A structural and functional evaluation. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  P. M. Matthews,et al.  Evidence of early cortical atrophy in MS , 2003, Neurology.

[20]  Jüri Allik,et al.  Detection of motion onset and offset: reaction time and visual evoked potential analysis , 2007, Psychological research.

[21]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .

[22]  Y. Itoyama,et al.  Relevance of callosal and periventricular MRI lesions to oligoclonal bands in multiple sclerosis , 2006, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[23]  Marco Rovaris,et al.  Imaging primary progressive multiple sclerosis: the contribution of structural, metabolic, and functional MRI techniques , 2004, Multiple sclerosis.

[24]  J. Kurtzke.  Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis , 1983, Neurology.

[25]  L. Leocani,et al.  Neurophysiological markers , 2008, Neurological Sciences.

[26]  J. Downar,et al.  A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Andrew A. Marino,et al.  Evidence of a nonlinear human magnetic sense , 2007, Neuroscience.

[28]  Andrew Chesson,et al.  Detection of nonlinear event-related potentials , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[29]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging response to increased verbal working memory demands among patients with multiple sclerosis , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[30]  A. Compston,et al.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[31]  No doubt about offset latency. , 2004, Visual neuroscience.

[32]  M. Aminoff,et al.  Serial evoked potential studies in patients with definite multiple sclerosis. Clinical relevance. , 1984, Archives of neurology.

[33]  A J Thompson,et al.  MRI lesion volume measurement in multiple sclerosis and its correlation with disability: a comparison of fast fluid attenuated inversion recovery (fFLAIR) and spin echo sequences , 1998, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[34]  A. Minagar.  Multiple sclerosis: current knowledge and future directions , 2006, Neurological research.

[35]  W. Freeman,et al.  Spatial EEG patterns, non-linear dynamics and perception: the neo-sherringtonian view , 1985, Brain Research Reviews.

[36]  M. Honda,et al.  Activation of the primary and association auditory cortex by the transition of sound intensity: a new method for functional examination of the auditory cortex in humans , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[37]  F. Bandini,et al.  Parkinson's disease changes the balance of onset and offset visual responses: an evoked potential study , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[38]  W. L. Benedict,et al.  Multiple Sclerosis , 2007, Journal - Michigan State Medical Society.

[39]  M. Phillips.  Functional faults , 2008, Neurology.