HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE COMBINED STRONG AND WEAK LENSING ANALYSIS OF THE CLASH SAMPLE: MASS AND MAGNIFICATION MODELS AND SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTIES

We present results from a comprehensive lensing analysis in Hubble Space Telescope (HST) data of the complete Cluster Lensing And Supernova survey with Hubble cluster sample. We identify previously undiscovered multiple images, allowing improved or first constraints on the cluster inner mass distributions and profiles. We combine these strong lensing constraints with weak lensing shape measurements within the HST field of view (FOV) to jointly constrain the mass distributions. The analysis is performed in two different common parameterizations (one adopts light-traces-mass for both galaxies and dark matter while the other adopts an analytical, elliptical Navarro–Frenk–White form for the dark matter) to provide a better assessment of the underlying systematics—which is most important for deep, cluster-lensing surveys, especially when studying magnified high-redshift objects. We find that the typical (median), relative systematic differences throughout the central FOV are ∼40% in the (dimensionless) mass density, κ, and ∼20% in the magnification, μ. We show maps of these differences for each cluster, as well as the mass distributions, critical curves, and two-dimensional (2D)-integrated mass profiles. For the Einstein radii (zs = 2) we find that all typically agree within 10% between the two models, and Einstein masses agree, typically, within ∼15%. At larger radii, the total projected, 2D-integrated mass profiles of the two models, within r ∼ 2′, differ by ∼30%. Stacking the surface-density profiles of the sample from the two methods together, we obtain an average slope of dlog (Σ)/dlog (r) ∼ −0.64 ± 0.1, in the radial range [5350] kpc. Last, we also characterize the behavior of the average magnification, surface density, and shear differences between the two models as a function of both the radius from the center and the best-fit values of these quantities. All mass models and magnification maps are made publicly available for the community.

[1]  M. Oguri,et al.  HUBBLE FRONTIER FIELDS FIRST COMPLETE CLUSTER DATA: FAINT GALAXIES AT z ∼ 5–10 FOR UV LUMINOSITY FUNCTIONS AND COSMIC REIONIZATION , 2014, 1408.6903.

[2]  J. Diego,et al.  Free-form lensing implications for the collision of dark matter and gas in the frontier fields cluster MACS J0416.1−2403 , 2014, 1406.1217.

[3]  M. Sereno,et al.  A free-form lensing grid solution for A1689 with new multiple images , 2014, 1402.4170.

[4]  J. Kneib,et al.  Mass and magnification maps for the Hubble Space Telescope Frontier Fields clusters: implications for high-redshift studies , 2014 .

[5]  J. Diego,et al.  A GEOMETRICALLY SUPPORTED z ∼ 10 CANDIDATE MULTIPLY IMAGED BY THE HUBBLE FRONTIER FIELDS CLUSTER A2744 , 2014, 1407.3769.

[6]  O. Lahav,et al.  CLASH-X: A COMPARISON OF LENSING AND X-RAY TECHNIQUES FOR MEASURING THE MASS PROFILES OF GALAXY CLUSTERS , 2014, 1405.7876.

[7]  R. Massey,et al.  Hubble Frontier Fields: a high-precision strong-lensing analysis of galaxy cluster MACSJ0416.1-2403 using ∼200 multiple images , 2014, 1405.3582.

[8]  D. Coe,et al.  LENS MODELS AND MAGNIFICATION MAPS OF THE SIX HUBBLE FRONTIER FIELDS CLUSTERS , 2014, 1405.0222.

[9]  M. Meneghetti,et al.  CLASH: WEAK-LENSING SHEAR-AND-MAGNIFICATION ANALYSIS OF 20 GALAXY CLUSTERS , 2014, 1404.1375.

[10]  O. Lahav,et al.  THE MUSIC OF CLASH: PREDICTIONS ON THE CONCENTRATION–MASS RELATION , 2014, 1404.1384.

[11]  S. White,et al.  Lensing model of MACS J1149.5+2223 – I. Cluster mass reconstruction , 2014, 1402.7321.

[12]  J. Diego,et al.  YOUNG GALAXY CANDIDATES IN THE HUBBLE FRONTIER FIELDS. I. A2744 , 2014, 1402.6743.

[13]  F. Boone,et al.  The first Frontier Fields cluster: 4.5 μm excess in a z ~ 8 galaxy candidate in Abell 2744 , 2014, 1401.8263.

[14]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Strong lensing in RX J1347.5−1145 revisited , 2014 .

[15]  R. Bouwens,et al.  CHARACTERIZING FAINT GALAXIES IN THE REIONIZATION EPOCH: LBT CONFIRMS TWO L < 0.2 L⋆ SOURCES AT z = 6.4 BEHIND THE CLASH/FRONTIER FIELDS CLUSTER MACS0717.5+3745 , 2013, 1312.6299.

[16]  I. Hook,et al.  Lensed Type Ia supernovae as probes of cluster mass models , 2013, 1312.2576.

[17]  J. Kneib,et al.  PROBING THE z > 6 UNIVERSE WITH THE FIRST HUBBLE FRONTIER FIELDS CLUSTER A2744 , 2013, 1311.7670.

[18]  J. Koppenhoefer,et al.  Weak lensing analysis of SZ-selected clusters of galaxies from the SPT and Planck surveys , 2013, 1310.6744.

[19]  S. B. Cenko,et al.  TYPE-Ia SUPERNOVA RATES TO REDSHIFT 2.4 FROM CLASH: THE CLUSTER LENSING AND SUPERNOVA SURVEY WITH HUBBLE , 2013, 1310.3495.

[20]  O. Lahav,et al.  CLASH: z ∼ 6 young galaxy candidate quintuply lensed by the frontier field cluster RXC J2248.7−4431 , 2013, 1308.6280.

[21]  M. Donahue,et al.  CLASH: A CENSUS OF MAGNIFIED STAR-FORMING GALAXIES AT z ∼ 6–8 , 2013, 1308.1692.

[22]  O. Lahav,et al.  CLASH: Photometric redshifts with 16 HST bands in galaxy cluster fields , 2013, 1308.0063.

[23]  O. Lahav,et al.  A CENSUS OF STAR-FORMING GALAXIES IN THE Z ∼ 9–10 UNIVERSE BASED ON HST+SPITZER OBSERVATIONS OVER 19 CLASH CLUSTERS: THREE CANDIDATE Z ∼ 9–10 GALAXIES AND IMPROVED CONSTRAINTS ON THE STAR FORMATION RATE DENSITY AT Z ∼ 9.2 , 2012, 1211.2230.

[24]  David O. Jones,et al.  THREE GRAVITATIONALLY LENSED SUPERNOVAE BEHIND CLASH GALAXY CLUSTERS , 2013, 1312.0943.

[25]  Astrophysics,et al.  MAPPING COMPOUND COSMIC TELESCOPES CONTAINING MULTIPLE PROJECTED CLUSTER-SCALE HALOS , 2013, 1311.2583.

[26]  M. Meneghetti,et al.  CLASH-VLT: Spectroscopic confirmation of a z = 6.11 quintuply lensed galaxy in the Frontier Fields cluster RXC J2248.7-4431 , 2013, 1309.1593.

[27]  M. Meneghetti,et al.  CLASH-VLT: The mass, velocity-anisotropy, and pseudo-phase-space density profiles of the z = 0.44 galaxy cluster MACS J1206.2-0847 , 2013, 1307.5867.

[28]  P. Schneider,et al.  Mass-sheet degeneracy, power-law models and external convergence: Impact on the determination of the Hubble constant from gravitational lensing , 2013, 1306.0901.

[29]  S. Krughoff,et al.  The effective number density of galaxies for weak lensing measurements in the LSST project , 2013, 1305.0793.

[30]  O. Lahav,et al.  CLASH: COMPLETE LENSING ANALYSIS OF THE LARGEST COSMIC LENS MACS J0717.5+3745 AND SURROUNDING STRUCTURES , 2013, 1304.1223.

[31]  S. Seitz,et al.  Weak lensing analysis of RXC J2248.7−4431 , 2013, 1304.0764.

[32]  R. Mandelbaum,et al.  A HIGHLY ELONGATED PROMINENT LENS AT z = 0.87: FIRST STRONG-LENSING ANALYSIS OF EL GORDO , 2013, 1304.0455.

[33]  J. Richard,et al.  TESTING THE UNIVERSALITY OF THE FUNDAMENTAL METALLICITY RELATION AT HIGH REDSHIFT USING LOW-MASS GRAVITATIONALLY LENSED GALAXIES , 2013, 1302.3614.

[34]  M. Sereno,et al.  Mass, shape and thermal properties of Abell 1689 using a multiwavelength X-ray, lensing and Sunyaev–Zel'dovich analysis , 2012, 1210.3359.

[35]  T. Treu,et al.  THE DENSITY PROFILES OF MASSIVE, RELAXED GALAXY CLUSTERS. II. SEPARATING LUMINOUS AND DARK MATTER IN CLUSTER CORES , 2012, 1209.1392.

[36]  E. Ofek,et al.  The Hidden Fortress: Structure and substructure of the complex strong lensing cluster SDSS J1029+2623 , 2012, 1209.0458.

[37]  R. Bouwens,et al.  CLASH: THREE STRONGLY LENSED IMAGES OF A CANDIDATE z ≈ 11 GALAXY , 2012, 1211.3663.

[38]  M. Meneghetti,et al.  CLASH: THE ENHANCED LENSING EFFICIENCY OF THE HIGHLY ELONGATED MERGING CLUSTER MACS J0416.1−2403 , 2012, 1211.2797.

[39]  T. Lauer,et al.  A magnified young galaxy from about 500 million years after the Big Bang , 2012, Nature.

[40]  T. Treu,et al.  THE DENSITY PROFILES OF MASSIVE, RELAXED GALAXY CLUSTERS. I. THE TOTAL DENSITY OVER THREE DECADES IN RADIUS , 2012, 1209.1391.

[41]  J. Hjorth,et al.  The low-mass end of the fundamental relation for gravitationally lensed star-forming galaxies at 1 < z < 6† , 2012, 1209.0767.

[42]  Johan Richard,et al.  A weak lensing mass reconstruction of the large‐scale filament feeding the massive galaxy cluster MACS J0717.5+3745 , 2012, 1208.4323.

[43]  S. D. Rijcke,et al.  Lensing degeneracies and mass substructure , 2012, 1207.4692.

[44]  O. Lahav,et al.  CLASH: MASS DISTRIBUTION IN AND AROUND MACS J1206.2-0847 FROM A FULL CLUSTER LENSING ANALYSIS , 2012, 1204.3630.

[45]  Michael J. Kurtz,et al.  CLASH: PRECISE NEW CONSTRAINTS ON THE MASS PROFILE OF THE GALAXY CLUSTER A2261 , 2012, 1201.1616.

[46]  J. Kneib,et al.  Strong lensing by a node of the cosmic web The core of MACS J0717.5+3745 at z=0.55 , 2011, 1109.3301.

[47]  O. Lahav,et al.  CLASH: NEW MULTIPLE IMAGES CONSTRAINING THE INNER MASS PROFILE OF MACS J1206.2−0847 , 2011, 1107.2649.

[48]  Jean-Paul Kneib,et al.  Cluster lenses , 2012, 1202.0185.

[49]  M. Meneghetti,et al.  CLASH: DISCOVERY OF A BRIGHT z ≃ 6.2 DWARF GALAXY QUADRUPLY LENSED BY MACS J0329.6-0211 , 2011, 1111.5006.

[50]  A. Mann,et al.  X-ray–optical classification of cluster mergers and the evolution of the cluster merger fraction , 2011, 1111.2396.

[51]  O. Høst Galaxy cluster strong lensing: image deflections from density fluctuations along the line of sight , 2011, 1110.5331.

[52]  M. Oguri,et al.  Combined strong and weak lensing analysis of 28 clusters from the Sloan Giant Arcs Survey , 2011, 1109.2594.

[53]  O. Lahav,et al.  THE CLUSTER LENSING AND SUPERNOVA SURVEY WITH HUBBLE: AN OVERVIEW , 2011, 1106.3328.

[54]  S. Ravindranath,et al.  CANDELS: THE COSMIC ASSEMBLY NEAR-INFRARED DEEP EXTRAGALACTIC LEGACY SURVEY—THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS, IMAGING DATA PRODUCTS, AND MOSAICS , 2011, 1105.3753.

[55]  M. Bartelmann,et al.  The universal Einstein radius distribution from 10 000 SDSS clusters , 2011, 1105.2295.

[56]  M. Postman,et al.  A PRECISE CLUSTER MASS PROFILE AVERAGED FROM THE HIGHEST-QUALITY LENSING DATA , 2011, 1105.0444.

[57]  O. Lahav,et al.  THE CLUSTER LENSING AND SUPERNOVA SURVEY WITH HUBBLE (CLASH): STRONG-LENSING ANALYSIS OF A383 FROM 16-BAND HST/WFC3/ACS IMAGING , 2011, The Astrophysical Journal.

[58]  J. Rhodes,et al.  Creation of cosmic structure in the complex galaxy cluster merger Abell 2744 , 2011, 1103.2772.

[59]  M. Meneghetti,et al.  Comparison of an X-ray-selected sample of massive lensing clusters with the MareNostrum Universe ΛCDM simulation , 2011, 1103.0044.

[60]  J. Kneib,et al.  Discovery of a possibly old galaxy at z= 6.027, multiply imaged by the massive cluster Abell 383 , 2011, 1102.5092.

[61]  T. Treu,et al.  THE DARK MATTER DISTRIBUTION IN A383: EVIDENCE FOR A SHALLOW DENSITY CUSP FROM IMPROVED LENSING, STELLAR KINEMATIC, AND X-RAY DATA , 2011, 1101.3553.

[62]  T. Broadhurst,et al.  CLUSTER MASS PROFILES FROM A BAYESIAN ANALYSIS OF WEAK-LENSING DISTORTION AND MAGNIFICATION MEASUREMENTS: APPLICATIONS TO SUBARU DATA , 2010, 1011.3044.

[63]  R. Scaramella,et al.  Abell 611. II. X-ray and strong lensing analyses , 2010, 1002.1625.

[64]  D. Coe,et al.  A HIGH-RESOLUTION MASS MAP OF GALAXY CLUSTER SUBSTRUCTURE: LensPerfect ANALYSIS OF A1689 , 2010 .

[65]  M. Bartelmann Gravitational lensing , 2010, 1010.3829.

[66]  P. Natarajan,et al.  Cosmography with cluster strong lenses: the influence of substructure and line-of-sight haloes , 2010, 1010.0004.

[67]  J. Kneib,et al.  Cosmological Constraints from Strong Gravitational Lensing in Clusters of Galaxies , 2010, Science.

[68]  A. Edge,et al.  The X-ray brightest clusters of galaxies from the Massive Cluster Survey , 2010, 1004.4683.

[69]  L. Bradley,et al.  Full lensing analysis of Abell 1703: comparison of independent lens-modelling techniques , 2010, 1004.4660.

[70]  N. Benı́tez,et al.  Strong-lensing analysis of a complete sample of 12 MACS clusters at z > 0.5: mass models and Einstein radii , 2010, 1002.0521.

[71]  A. M. Swinbank,et al.  MACS J1423.8+2404: gravitational lensing by a massive, relaxed cluster of galaxies at z= 0.54 , 2009, 0911.4125.

[72]  J. Kneib,et al.  LoCuSS: first results from strong-lensing analysis of 20 massive galaxy clusters at z= 0.2 , 2009, 0911.3302.

[73]  T. Broadhurst,et al.  THE MASS STRUCTURE OF THE GALAXY CLUSTER Cl0024+1654 FROM A FULL LENSING ANALYSIS OF JOINT SUBARU AND ACS/NIC3 OBSERVATIONS , 2009, 0908.0069.

[74]  Birmingham,et al.  LoCuSS: Subaru Weak Lensing Study of 30 Galaxy Clusters , 2009, 0903.1103.

[75]  A. M. Swinbank,et al.  HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS OF A SPECTACULAR NEW STRONG-LENSING GALAXY CLUSTER: MACS J1149.5+2223 AT z = 0.544 , 2009, 0911.2003.

[76]  P. Marshall,et al.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF DARK MATTER OVER THREE DECADES IN RADIUS IN THE LENSING CLUSTER ABELL 611 , 2009, 0909.3527.

[77]  THE LARGEST GRAVITATIONAL LENS: MACS J0717.5+3745 (z = 0.546) , 2009, 0907.4232.

[78]  T. Broadhurst,et al.  DISCOVERY OF THE LARGEST KNOWN LENSED IMAGES FORMED BY A CRITICALLY CONVERGENT LENSING CLUSTER , 2009, 0906.5079.

[79]  M. Meneghetti,et al.  X-ray and strong lensing mass estimate of MS2137.3–2353 , 2009, 0902.4051.

[80]  D. Coe,et al.  New Multiply-Lensed Galaxies Identified in ACS/NIC3 Observations of Cl0024+1654, Using an Improved Mass Model , 2009, 0902.3971.

[81]  J. Kneib,et al.  A spectacular giant arc in the massive cluster lens MACS J1206.2−0847★ , 2009, 0901.2144.

[82]  J. Tyson,et al.  DARK MATTER IN THE GALAXY CLUSTER CL J1226+3332 AT z = 0.89 , 2008, 0810.0709.

[83]  M. Meneghetti,et al.  Combining weak and strong cluster lensing: applications to simulations and MS 2137 , 2008, 0806.1967.

[84]  Chih-Wei L. Huang,et al.  MASS AND HOT BARYONS IN MASSIVE GALAXY CLUSTERS FROM SUBARU WEAK-LENSING AND AMiBA SUNYAEV–ZEL'DOVICH EFFECT OBSERVATIONS , 2008, 0810.0969.

[85]  P. Bekaert,et al.  Non-parametric strong lens inversion of Cl 0024+1654: illustrating the monopole degeneracy , 2008, 0806.2609.

[86]  T. Broadhurst,et al.  Comparison of Cluster Lensing Profiles with ΛCDM Predictions , 2008, 0805.2617.

[87]  E. Fuselier,et al.  LensPerfect: Gravitational Lens Mass Map Reconstructions Yielding Exact Reproduction of All Multiple Images , 2008, 0803.1199.

[88]  J. Kneib,et al.  Strong lensing in Abell 1703: constraints on the slope of the inner dark matter distribution , 2008, 0802.4292.

[89]  T. Broadhurst,et al.  Large Einstein radii: a problem for ΛCDM , 2008, 0801.1875.

[90]  H. Hoekstra,et al.  Weak Gravitational Lensing and Its Cosmological Applications , 2008, 0805.0139.

[91]  T. Schrabback,et al.  The mass distribution of RX J1347–1145 from strong lensing , 2008, 0801.1795.

[92]  T. Schrabback,et al.  Dark Matter and Baryons in the X-Ray Luminous Merging Galaxy Cluster RX J1347.5–1145 , 2007, 0711.4850.

[93]  Weak lensing ellipticities in a strong lensing regime , 2007, 0709.1479.

[94]  W. Forman,et al.  Images, Structural Properties, and Metal Abundances of Galaxy Clusters Observed with Chandra ACIS-I at 0.1 < z < 1.3 , 2007, astro-ph/0703156.

[95]  J. Kneib,et al.  ApJ, accepted Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 03/07/07 SEPARATING BARYONS AND DARK MATTER IN CLUSTER CORES: A FULL 2-D LENSING AND DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF ABELL 383 AND MS2137-23 , 2022 .

[96]  IoA,et al.  Improved constraints on dark energy from Chandra X-ray observations of the largest relaxed galaxy clusters , 2007, 0706.0033.

[97]  J. Kneib,et al.  A Bayesian approach to strong lensing modelling of galaxy clusters , 2007, 0706.0048.

[98]  A. Edge,et al.  A Complete Sample of 12 Very X-Ray Luminous Galaxy Clusters at z > 0.5 , 2007, astro-ph/0703394.

[99]  J. Comerford,et al.  The observed concentration–mass relation for galaxy clusters , 2007, astro-ph/0703126.

[100]  Y. Mellier,et al.  The Stability of the Point-Spread Function of the Advanced Camera for Surveys on the Hubble Space Telescope and Implications for Weak Gravitational Lensing , 2007, astro-ph/0702140.

[101]  Weak Lensing Mass Reconstruction of the Galaxy Cluster Abell 209 , 2007, astro-ph/0701799.

[102]  KIPACStanford,et al.  The dark matter haloes of massive, relaxed galaxy clusters observed with Chandra , 2006, astro-ph/0610038.

[103]  C. Jones,et al.  Deep XMM-Newton and Chandra Observations of Cl J1226.9+3332: A Detailed X-Ray Mass Analysis of a z = 0.89 Galaxy Cluster , 2006, astro-ph/0609690.

[104]  P. Hudelot,et al.  Combining Strong and Weak Gravitational Lensing in Abell 1689 , 2006, astro-ph/0612165.

[105]  Tucson,et al.  Strong and Weak Lensing United. III. Measuring the Mass Distribution of the Merging Galaxy Cluster 1ES 0657–558 , 2006, astro-ph/0608408.

[106]  R. Bouwens,et al.  Galaxies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. I. Detection, Multiband Photometry, Photometric Redshifts, and Morphology , 2006, astro-ph/0605262.

[107]  H. Dejonghe,et al.  A genetic algorithm for the non-parametric inversion of strong lensing systems , 2006 .

[108]  A. Slosar,et al.  Bayesian evidence as a tool for comparing datasets , 2004, astro-ph/0412535.

[109]  J. Kneib,et al.  A Hubble Space Telescope lensing survey of X-ray luminous galaxy clusters – IV. Mass, structure and thermodynamics of cluster cores at z = 0.2 , 2005 .

[110]  Max Tegmark,et al.  Non-parametric inversion of strong lensing systems , 2004, astro-ph/0408418.

[111]  R. Bouwens,et al.  Strong-Lensing Analysis of A1689 from Deep Advanced Camera Images , 2004, astro-ph/0409132.

[112]  H. Ebeling,et al.  Discovery of a Large-Scale Filament Connected to the Massive Galaxy Cluster MACS J0717.5+3745 at z = 0.55 , 2004, astro-ph/0406049.

[113]  J. Kneib,et al.  A Probable z ~ 7 Galaxy Strongly Lensed by the Rich Cluster A2218: Exploring the Dark Ages , 2004, astro-ph/0402319.

[114]  T. Treu,et al.  The Dark Matter Distribution in the Central Regions of Galaxy Clusters: Implications for Cold Dark Matter , 2003, astro-ph/0309465.

[115]  Y. Mellier,et al.  A radial mass profile analysis of the lensing cluster MS 2137.3–2353 , 2002, astro-ph/0212214.

[116]  S. Maddox,et al.  Weak Gravitational Lensing by a Sample of X-Ray Luminous Clusters of Galaxies. I. The Data Set , 2002 .

[117]  A. Edge,et al.  MACS: A Quest for the Most Massive Galaxy Clusters in the Universe , 2000, astro-ph/0009101.

[118]  J. Kneib,et al.  A Hubble Space Telescope Lensing Survey of X-Ray Luminous Galaxy Clusters. I. A383 , 2000, astro-ph/0008315.

[119]  J. Rhodes,et al.  Weak Lensing Measurements: A Revisited Method and Application toHubble Space Telescope Images , 1999, astro-ph/9905090.

[120]  ApJ, in press , 1999 .

[121]  N. Benı́tez Bayesian Photometric Redshift Estimation , 1998, astro-ph/9811189.

[122]  L. Williams,et al.  Non-parametric reconstruction of cluster mass distribution from strong lensing: modelling Abell 370 , 1997, astro-ph/9707207.

[123]  I. Smail,et al.  Hubble Space Telescope Observations of the Lensing Cluster Abell 2218 , 1995, astro-ph/9511015.

[124]  S. White,et al.  The Structure of cold dark matter halos , 1995, astro-ph/9508025.

[125]  T. Broadhurst,et al.  A Method for Weak Lensing Observations , 1994, astro-ph/9411005.

[126]  G. Abell,et al.  A Catalog of Rich Clusters of Galaxies , 1989 .

[127]  I. Shapiro,et al.  On model-dependent bounds on H(0) from gravitational images Application of Q0957 + 561A,B , 1985 .