Trace element analyses of carbonates using portable and micro-X-ray fluorescence: performance and optimization of measurement parameters and strategies

Variations in elemental abundances in carbonate archives offer a wealth of information that can be used as a proxy for the palaeoenvironment and diagenetic history. The state-of-the-art portable handheld X-ray Fluorescence (pXRF) and laboratory micro X-ray Fluorescence (μXRF) instruments provide a relatively inexpensive, fast and non-destructive way of acquiring these trace element composition data. However, there are well-known issues and limitations regarding the method of spectrum acquisition and the conversion of XRF spectra into quantitative elemental mass fractions. This study offers a guideline for the appropriate use of these XRF techniques for the study of carbonates. Using certified calcium carbonate and dolomite standards, accuracy and reproducibility of a pXRF (Bruker AXS Tracer IV) and a μXRF (Bruker M4 Tornado) device are tested under various measurement conditions. The experimental set-up allowed for the variation of several parameters, including the measurement area, integration time, quantification method and measurement strategy. The effects on the accuracy and reproducibility of the quantified elemental abundance results are examined to assess the optimal performance conditions for both devices for the determination of trace element abundances in natural carbonates. The limits of detection and quantification are evaluated for both instruments for a range of trace elements commonly used as palaeoenvironmental proxies (e.g. Sr, Mn and Fe). The quality of the XRF spectra is evaluated using spectral processing software. As a result, two new methods for the determination of optimized parameter combinations are proposed for a range of commonly used elements. The Time of Stable Reproducibility (TSR) is based on optimizing the measurement reproducibility by examining the change of the relative standard deviation per time unit and proposing an integration time threshold for reproducible measurements. The Time of Stable Accuracy (TSA) is based on optimizing the measurement accuracy by studying changes in accuracy as a function of increasing integration time and defining an integration time threshold for accurate measurements. An overview table including minimum integration times by which a reliable measurement is achieved is provided for all analyzed elements and experimental set-ups for this study. However, the methodological approach that is developed here is applicable to other (carbonate) materials as well. A comparison between the two X-ray fluorescence instruments allows the evaluation of their respective advantages and disadvantages. Finally, we recommend optimal measurement strategies and techniques for specific research questions.

[1]  P. Claeys,et al.  Micro X‐ray fluorescence (μXRF) line scanning on Cretaceous rudist bivalves: A new method for reproducible trace element profiles in bivalve calcite , 2017 .

[2]  C. Snoeck,et al.  Seasonal Cyclicity in Trace Elements and Stable Isotopes of Modern Horse Enamel , 2016, PloS one.

[3]  Chris Robertson,et al.  Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Oral Prevalence in Scotland (HOPSCOTCH): A Feasibility Study in Dental Settings , 2016, PloS one.

[4]  H. Rowe,et al.  Development and optimization of microbeam X-ray fluorescence analysis of Sr in speleothems , 2016 .

[5]  V. Vandeginste,et al.  Application of handheld energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry to carbonate studies: opportunities and challenges , 2015 .

[6]  J. Hall‐Spencer,et al.  Sea urchin response to rising pCO2 shows ocean acidification may fundamentally alter the chemistry of marine skeletons , 2014 .

[7]  N. Brand,et al.  Performance comparison of portable XRF instruments , 2014 .

[8]  Q. Cheng,et al.  Spatial patterns of geochemical elements measured on rock surfaces by portable X-ray fluorescence: application to hand specimens and rock outcrops , 2014 .

[9]  B. Fresia,et al.  Improving lithological discrimination in exploration drill-cores using portable X-ray fluorescence measurements: (1) testing three Olympus Innov-X analysers on unprepared cores , 2014 .

[10]  D. Canfield,et al.  Tracing euxinia by molybdenum concentrations in sediments using handheld x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (HHXRF) , 2013 .

[11]  Ellery E Frahm,et al.  The technological versus methodological revolution of portable XRF in archaeology , 2013 .

[12]  G. D. De Lange,et al.  X‐ray fluorescence core scanning of wet marine sediments: methods to improve quality and reproducibility of high‐resolution paleoenvironmental records , 2012 .

[13]  H. Rowe,et al.  The quantification and application of handheld energy-dispersive x-ray fluorescence (ED-XRF) in mudrock chemostratigraphy and geochemistry , 2012 .

[14]  George T. Jones,et al.  pXRF: a study of inter-instrument performance , 2012 .

[15]  N. Vickery,et al.  Non‐destructive analysis using PXRF: methodology and application to archaeological ceramics , 2011 .

[16]  Peter J Vikesland,et al.  Filter-feeding bivalves store and biodeposit colloidally stable gold nanoparticles. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  M. Kylander,et al.  High‐resolution X‐ray fluorescence core scanning analysis of Les Echets (France) sedimentary sequence: new insights from chemical proxies , 2011 .

[18]  Colin R. Janssen,et al.  Comparison of laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry and micro-X-ray fluorescence spectrometry for elemental imaging in Daphnia magna. , 2010, Analytica chimica acta.

[19]  Keith M. Prufer,et al.  Assessing the applicability of portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry for obsidian provenance research in the Maya lowlands , 2010 .

[20]  R. Loucks,et al.  Mississippian Barnett Formation, Fort Worth Basin, Texas: Bulk geochemical inferences and Mo–TOC constraints on the severity of hydrographic restriction , 2008 .

[21]  G. Weltje,et al.  Calibration of XRF core scanners for quantitative geochemical logging of sediment cores: Theory and application , 2008 .

[22]  J. Susini,et al.  Trace element distribution in annual stalagmite laminae mapped by micrometer-resolution X-ray fluorescence : Implications for incorporation of environmentally significant species , 2007 .

[23]  M. Kölling,et al.  Influence of the water content on X‐ray fluorescence core‐scanning measurements in soft marine sediments , 2007 .

[24]  G. Zachariadis,et al.  Comparison of a portable micro-X-ray fluorescence spectrometry with inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry for the ancient ceramics analysis , 2004 .

[25]  J. Osán,et al.  Quantitative trace element analysis of individual fly ash particles by means of X-ray microfluorescence. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[26]  Pierre Chevallier,et al.  A Micro-XRF Study of the Element Distribution on the Growth Front of Mussel Shell (Species of Unio Crassus Retzius) , 2001 .

[27]  D. J. Kalnicky,et al.  Field portable XRF analysis of environmental samples. , 2001, Journal of hazardous materials.

[28]  N. Broll Quantitative x‐ray fluorescence analysis. Theory and practice of the fundamental coefficient method , 1986 .

[29]  Richard M. Rousseau,et al.  Fundamental algorithm between concentration and intensity in XRF analysis 2—practical application† , 1984 .

[30]  Lawrence H. Keith,et al.  Principles of environmental analysis , 1983 .

[31]  R. Speakman,et al.  Portable XRF analysis of archaeological sediments and ceramics , 2015 .

[32]  L. Löwemark,et al.  Can XRF scanning of speleothems be used as a non-destructive method to identify paleoflood events in caves? , 2015 .

[33]  Michael Haschke,et al.  Laboratory Micro-X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy , 2014 .

[34]  Philip J. Potts,et al.  Portable x-ray fluorescence spectrometry : capabilities for in situ analysis , 2008 .

[35]  S. Calvert,et al.  Chapter Fourteen Elemental Proxies for Palaeoclimatic and Palaeoceanographic Variability in Marine Sediments: Interpretation and Application , 2007 .

[36]  B. Kanngießer,et al.  Handbook of practical X-ray fluorescence analysis , 2006 .

[37]  M. C. Jones,et al.  Effects of weathering on in situ portable X-ray fluorescence analyses of geological outcrops: dolerite and rhyolite outcrops from the Preseli Mountains, South Wales , 2006 .

[38]  D. N. Papadopouloua,et al.  Development and optimisation of a portable micro-XRF method for in situ multi-element analysis of ancient ceramics , 2006 .

[39]  Liangquan Ge,et al.  Influence of and correction for moisture in rocks, soils and sediments on in situ XRF analysis , 2005 .

[40]  D. N. Papadopouloua,et al.  Comparison of a portable micro-X-ray fluorescence spectrometry with inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry for the ancient ceramics analysis , 2004 .

[41]  R. Rousseau Detection Limit and Estimate of Uncertainty of Analytical Xrf , 2002 .

[42]  B. Wheeler,et al.  ANALYSIS OF LIMESTONES AND DOLOMITES BY X-RAY FLUORESCENCE* , 1999 .

[43]  Jacob Sherman,et al.  The theoretical derivation of fluorescent X-ray intensities from mixtures , 1955 .