Tumour Control Probability in Cancer Stem Cells Hypothesis

The tumour control probability (TCP) is a formalism derived to compare various treatment regimens of radiation therapy, defined as the probability that given a prescribed dose of radiation, a tumour has been eradicated or controlled. In the traditional view of cancer, all cells share the ability to divide without limit and thus have the potential to generate a malignant tumour. However, an emerging notion is that only a sub-population of cells, the so-called cancer stem cells (CSCs), are responsible for the initiation and maintenance of the tumour. A key implication of the CSC hypothesis is that these cells must be eradicated to achieve cures, thus we define TCPS as the probability of eradicating CSCs for a given dose of radiation. A cell surface protein expression profile, such as CD44high/CD24low for breast cancer or CD133 for glioma, is often used as a biomarker to monitor CSCs enrichment. However, it is increasingly recognized that not all cells bearing this expression profile are necessarily CSCs, and in particular early generations of progenitor cells may share the same phenotype. Thus, due to the lack of a perfect biomarker for CSCs, we also define a novel measurable TCPCD+, that is the probability of eliminating or controlling biomarker positive cells. Based on these definitions, we use stochastic methods and numerical simulations parameterized for the case of gliomas, to compare the theoretical TCPS and the measurable TCPCD+. We also use the measurable TCP to compare the effect of various radiation protocols.

[1]  N. Kampen,et al.  Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry , 1981 .

[2]  M. Krause,et al.  Exploring the role of cancer stem cells in radioresistance , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[3]  Cell-cycle times and the tumour control probability. , 2010, Mathematical medicine and biology : a journal of the IMA.

[4]  T. R. Munro,et al.  The relation between tumour lethal doses and the radiosensitivity of tumour cells. , 1961, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  M. Kohandel,et al.  Investigating the link between epithelial-mesenchymal transition and the cancer stem cell phenotype: A mathematical approach. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  Kristin R. Swanson,et al.  Modeling Diffusely Invading Brain Tumors An Individualized Approach to Quantifying Glioma Evolution and Response to Therapy , 2008 .

[7]  S. Sivaloganathan,et al.  Characterization of brain cancer stem cells: a mathematical approach , 2009, Cell proliferation.

[8]  W. D. Evans,et al.  PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS , 1941 .

[9]  D. Sherrington Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1983 .

[10]  Michael F. Milosevic,et al.  Modeling the Spatial Distribution of Chronic Tumor Hypoxia: Implications for Experimental and Clinical Studies , 2012, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[11]  D. Brenner,et al.  Dose timing in tumor radiotherapy: considerations of cell number stochasticity. , 1996, Mathematical biosciences.

[12]  S. Morrison,et al.  Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Paul A. Wiggins,et al.  Normal and neoplastic nonstem cells can spontaneously convert to a stem-like state , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  J. Dick,et al.  Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell , 1997, Nature Medicine.

[15]  L. Hanin,et al.  Tumor control probability in radiation treatment. , 2011, Medical physics.

[16]  Sivabal Sivaloganathan,et al.  Stochastic model for tumor control probability: effects of cell cycle and (a)symmetric proliferation , 2014, Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling.

[17]  R. Henkelman,et al.  Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells , 2004, Nature.

[18]  B. Wouters,et al.  Cells at intermediate oxygen levels can be more important than the "hypoxic fraction" in determining tumor response to fractionated radiotherapy. , 1997, Radiation research.

[19]  Peter Dirks,et al.  Cancer stem cells: an evolving concept , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[20]  R. Ferrante,et al.  Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells , 2003 .

[21]  M. Zaider,et al.  Tumour control probability: a formulation applicable to any temporal protocol of dose delivery. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Cynthia Hawkins,et al.  Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors. , 2003, Cancer research.

[23]  Jian Jian Li Cancer Stem Cells and Radiotherapy , 2012 .

[24]  K. Camphausen,et al.  CD133+ Glioblastoma Stem-like Cells are Radiosensitive with a Defective DNA Damage Response Compared with Established Cell Lines , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[25]  Wenjun Guo,et al.  The Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Generates Cells with Properties of Stem Cells , 2008, Cell.

[26]  M. Kohandel,et al.  Quantitative approaches to cancer stem cells and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. , 2012, Seminars in cancer biology.

[27]  R. Weinberg,et al.  Cell plasticity and heterogeneity in cancer. , 2013, Clinical chemistry.

[28]  L. Hlatky,et al.  Acute and fractionated irradiation differentially modulate glioma stem cell division kinetics. , 2013, Cancer research.

[29]  Mark W. Dewhirst,et al.  Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response , 2006, Nature.

[30]  Mikael Karlsson,et al.  The effects of hypoxia on the theoretical modelling of tumour control probability , 2005, Acta oncologica.

[31]  Vladimir Maz’ya,et al.  A Mathematical Approach , 2002 .

[32]  G Powathil,et al.  Mathematical modeling of brain tumors: effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.