Dimensionality of the 9‐item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale revisited: A Bayesian structural equation modeling approach

Dimensionality of the 9‐item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale revisited: A Bayesian structural equation modeling approach: Ted C. T. Fong, et al. Centre on Behavioral Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

[1]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Bayesian structural equation modeling: a more flexible representation of substantive theory. , 2012, Psychological methods.

[2]  Sik-Yum Lee,et al.  Basic and Advanced Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling: With Applications in the Medical and Behavioral Sciences , 2012 .

[3]  E. Wagenmakers A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  P. Barrett Structural equation modelling : Adjudging model fit , 2007 .

[5]  Li Cai,et al.  Generalized full-information item bifactor analysis. , 2011, Psychological methods.

[6]  C. Nerstad,et al.  Factorial validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) across occupational groups in Norway. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[7]  Rainbow Tin Hung Ho,et al.  Factor analyses of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: a Bayesian structural equation modeling approach , 2013, Quality of Life Research.

[8]  R. Ho,et al.  Testing gender invariance of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale using the classical approach and Bayesian approach , 2014, Quality of Life Research.

[9]  Examining the Psychometric Properties of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale in Two Spanish Multi‐Occupational Samples , 2012 .

[10]  R. Poulin SPECIES RICHNESS OF PARASITE ASSEMBLAGES: Evolution and Patterns , 1997 .

[11]  W. Schaufeli,et al.  Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) A Cross-Cultural Analysis , 2010 .

[12]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Bayesian data analysis. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[13]  Tihomir Asparouhov,et al.  Bayesian Analysis of Latent Variable Models using Mplus , 2010 .

[14]  S. Ng,et al.  Measuring Engagement at Work: Validation of the Chinese Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale , 2011, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[15]  J. Fox,et al.  Bayesian tests of measurement invariance. , 2012, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[16]  C. Henn,et al.  Dimensionality of the 9-Item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) , 2013, Psychological reports.

[17]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire , 2006 .

[18]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach , 2002 .

[19]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[20]  Philippe Golay,et al.  Further insights on the French WISC-IV factor structure through Bayesian structural equation modeling. , 2013, Psychological assessment.

[21]  Thomas J. Dunn,et al.  From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. , 2014, British journal of psychology.

[22]  P. Fayers,et al.  Comparing higher order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30 , 2011, Quality of Life Research.

[23]  J. H. Steiger,et al.  The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[24]  S. Vrieze Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). , 2012, Psychological methods.

[25]  W. Schaufeli,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Russian version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) , 2017 .

[26]  A. Bakker,et al.  A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences , 2010 .

[27]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling With Cross-Loadings and Residual Covariances , 2015 .

[28]  Xin-Yuan Song and Sik-Yum Lee. Basic and advanced Bayesian structural equation modeling , 2015 .