Differences in Pulmonary Function Improvement after Once-Daily LABA/LAMA Fixed-Dose Combinations in Patients with COPD

This real-world study evaluated the efficacy of once-daily long-acting β2-agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) for improving lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Patients with COPD who were treated with once-daily LABA/LAMA FDCs for 12 months were included. We evaluated their lung function improvement after 12 months of treatment with different LABA/LAMA FDCs. A total of 198 patients with COPD who were treated with once-daily LABA/LAMA FDCs were analyzed. A total of 114 patients were treated with umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VIL); 34 patients were treated with indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY); and 50 patients were treated with tiotropium/olodaterol (TIO/OLO). The forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was significantly increased in the patients treated with all three once-daily FDCs (55.2% to 60.9%, p = 0.012 for UMEC/VIL, 58.2% to 63.6%, p = 0.023 for IND/GLY, and 54.1% to 57.7%, p = 0.009 for TIO/OLO). The treatment of COPD patients with TIO/OLO resulted in a significant improvement in both forced vital capacity (FVC%) (71.7% to 77.9%, p = 0.009) and residual volume (RV%) (180.1% to 152.5%, p < 0.01) compared with those treated with UMEC/VIL (FVC%: 75.1% to 81.5%, p < 0.001; RV%:173.8% to 165.2%, p = 0.231) or IND/GLY (FVC%: 73.9% to 79.3%, p = 0.08; RV%:176.8% to 168.3%, p = 0.589). Patients treated with UMEC/VIL or TIO/OLO showed significant improvement in FVC. In addition, those receiving TIO/OLO also showed significant improvement in RV reduction.

[1]  M. Chan,et al.  Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Tiotropium/Olodaterol, Umeclidinium/Vilanterol, and Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Taiwan: A Multicenter Cohort Study , 2022, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[2]  K. Gourgoulianis,et al.  Pulmonary function testing in COPD: looking beyond the curtain of FEV1 , 2021, npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine.

[3]  Y. Tohda,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting β2 agonist fixed-dose combinations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease , 2021, BMC Pulmonary Medicine.

[4]  Shih-Lung Cheng Comparison of Effectiveness Using Different Dual Bronchodilator Agents in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treatment , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[5]  A. Cole,et al.  Evaluation of Medication Adherence and Rescue Medication Use in Non-Exacerbating Patients with COPD Receiving Umeclidinium/Vilanterol or Budesonide/Formoterol as Initial Maintenance Therapy , 2020, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[6]  M. Cazzola,et al.  Efficacy and cardiovascular safety profile of dual bronchodilation therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A bidimensional comparative analysis across fixed-dose combinations. , 2019, Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[7]  R. Stanford,et al.  Evaluation of rescue medication use and medication adherence receiving umeclidinium/vilanterol versus tiotropium bromide/olodaterol , 2019, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[8]  Meilan K. Han,et al.  Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease: the GOLD science committee report 2019 , 2019, European Respiratory Journal.

[9]  V. Kim,et al.  Combined FEV1 and FVC Bronchodilator Response, Exacerbations, and Mortality in COPD. , 2019, Annals of the American Thoracic Society.

[10]  V. Hespanhol,et al.  COPD: understanding patients’ adherence to inhaled medications , 2018, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[11]  G. Feldman,et al.  Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Tiotropium/Olodaterol in Maintenance-Naïve Patients with Moderate Symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis , 2018, Pulmonary Therapy.

[12]  J. Riley,et al.  Comparative Efficacy of Once-Daily Umeclidinium/Vilanterol and Tiotropium/Olodaterol Therapy in Symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Study , 2017, Advances in Therapy.

[13]  E. Kerwin,et al.  Dual Bronchodilation with Indacaterol Maleate/Glycopyrronium Bromide Compared with Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe COPD: Results from Two Randomized, Controlled, Cross-over Studies , 2017, Lung.

[14]  Dave Singh Small Airway Disease in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease , 2017, Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases.

[15]  A. Ismaila,et al.  A Network Meta-Analysis of Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist (LAMA) and Long-Acting β2-Agonist (LABA) Combinations in COPD , 2017, Pulmonary Therapy.

[16]  L. Corbetta,et al.  Dilemmas, Confusion, and Misconceptions Related to Small Airways Directed Therapy , 2017, Chest.

[17]  Dave Singh,et al.  Reduction in clinically important deterioration in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with aclidinium/formoterol , 2017, Respiratory Research.

[18]  Dave Singh,et al.  Clinical characteristics of COPD patients with tidal expiratory flow limitation , 2017, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[19]  A. Anzueto,et al.  The effect of indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus tiotropium or salmeterol/fluticasone on the prevention of clinically important deterioration in COPD , 2017, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[20]  H. Chrystyn,et al.  A randomised open-label cross-over study of inhaler errors, preference and time to achieve correct inhaler use in patients with COPD or asthma: comparison of ELLIPTA with other inhaler devices , 2017, npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine.

[21]  W. Ramadan,et al.  Patterns of use of dry powder inhalers versus pressurized metered-dose inhalers devices in adult patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma: An observational comparative study , 2017, Chronic respiratory disease.

[22]  R. Buhl,et al.  Effect of tiotropium and olodaterol on symptoms and patient-reported outcomes in patients with COPD: results from four randomised, double-blind studies , 2017, npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine.

[23]  P. Langguth,et al.  In vitro dose comparison of Respimat® inhaler with dry powder inhalers for COPD maintenance therapy , 2014, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[24]  H. Chrystyn,et al.  A randomised open-label cross-over study of inhaler errors, preference and time to achieve correct inhaler use in patients with COPD or asthma: comparison of ELLIPTA with other inhaler devices , 2016, npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine.

[25]  Dave Singh,et al.  Prevention of clinically important deteriorations in COPD with umeclidinium/vilanterol , 2016, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[26]  M. Cazzola,et al.  A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Dual Bronchodilation With LAMA/LABA for the Treatment of Stable COPD. , 2016, Chest.

[27]  D. Halpin,et al.  Diagnosis, assessment, and phenotyping of COPD: beyond FEV1 , 2016, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[28]  M. Baldwin,et al.  Comparative efficacy of fixed-dose combinations of long-acting muscarinic antagonists and long-acting β2-agonists: a systematic review and network meta-analysis , 2016, Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease.

[29]  A. Spanevello,et al.  Small airway dysfunction and flow and volume bronchodilator responsiveness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease , 2015, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[30]  T. Mafort,et al.  Correlations Between Small Airway Function, Ventilation Distribution, and Functional Exercise Capacity in COPD Patients , 2014, Lung.

[31]  B. Celli,et al.  Once-daily umeclidinium/vilanterol 125/25 mcg in COPD: a randomized, controlled study. , 2014, Chest.

[32]  V. Backer,et al.  Adherence to inhaled therapies, health outcomes and costs in patients with asthma and COPD. , 2013, Respiratory medicine.

[33]  P. Calverley,et al.  Bronchodilator reversibility in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: use and limitations. , 2013, The Lancet. Respiratory medicine.

[34]  J. Wedzicha,et al.  Analysis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations with the dual bronchodilator QVA149 compared with glycopyrronium and tiotropium (SPARK): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study. , 2013, The Lancet. Respiratory medicine.

[35]  E. Bateman,et al.  Efficacy and safety of once-daily QVA149 compared with twice-daily salmeterol-fluticasone in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ILLUMINATE): a randomised, double-blind, parallel group study. , 2013, The Lancet. Respiratory medicine.

[36]  B. Celli,et al.  Bronchodilator reversibility in COPD. , 2011, Chest.

[37]  Maurice Hayot,et al.  The forgotten message from gold: FVC is a primary clinical outcome measure of bronchodilator reversibility in COPD. , 2008, Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[38]  M. Rué,et al.  The bronchodilator test in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: interpretation methods. , 2007, Respiratory medicine.

[39]  P. Calverley,et al.  Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. , 2007, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[40]  L. Pini,et al.  Volume effect and exertional dyspnoea after bronchodilator in patients with COPD with and without expiratory flow limitation at rest , 2002, Thorax.

[41]  L. Forkert,et al.  Response of lung volumes to inhaled salbutamol in a large population of patients with severe hyperinflation. , 2002, Chest.