Actor-Network-Theory perspective on a forestry decision support system design

Use of decision support systems (DSS) has thus far been framed as a social process of adoption or technical process of usability. We analyze the development of a DSS as a process of institutionalization of new as well as drift of existing practices. We write an Actor-Network-Theory (ANT) account, i.e. an interpretive study, that follows the traces left by both human and non-human actors (e.g. technology, methodologies, etc.) to understand how a DSS development project institutionalizes DSS technology in several forest management organizations in the German state of Rheinland Pfalz. The research has an innovative value since it uses ANT in the design of a DSS, hence affecting it, while commonly ANT has been used to understand why networks work or do not. Moreover, we use a new technology (PREZITM, www.prezi.com) for the visualization of the whole actor network coherent to the ANT methodology, i.e. “keeping the social flat.” As a result, the development of the ANT account proposed in the present paper, even if still partial, supports the design of new technologies being introduced in current practice and generates an important learning effect thanks to the underpinning interpretative approach.

[1]  R. Kasperson,et al.  A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Marco te Brömmelstroet,et al.  Transparency, flexibility, simplicity: From buzzwords to strategies for real PSS improvement , 2012, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[3]  Teppo Hujala,et al.  Addressing forest management planning problems with computerized tools. A synthesis of the experience world-wide , 2014 .

[4]  Tiko Iyamu,et al.  A Guide to Selecting Theory to Underpin Information Systems Studies , 2013, TDIT.

[5]  Paul Schot,et al.  Bottlenecks Blocking Widespread Usage of Planning Support Systems , 2005 .

[6]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  The Art and Science of Mess Management , 1981 .

[7]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Modeling the Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use , 1994, ICIS.

[8]  Amany R. Elbanna,et al.  From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2001 .

[9]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[10]  H. Whitmore,et al.  The Diffusion of Decision Support Systems in Healthcare: Are We There Yet? , 2000, Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives.

[11]  M. Callon Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[12]  J. Hassard,et al.  Symmetrical Absence/Symmetrical Absurdity: Critical Notes on the Production of Actor-Network Accounts , 2004 .

[13]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities , 1999, MIS Q..

[14]  Nicola Spiller,et al.  Actor-network theory and stakeholder collaboration: The case of Cultural Districts , 2011 .

[15]  J. Hassard,et al.  Actor Network Theory and After , 1999 .

[16]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[18]  F Kuhlmann,et al.  Information technology and farm management: developments and perspectives , 2001 .

[19]  Paul Schot,et al.  A SWOT Analysis of Planning Support Systems , 2007 .

[20]  Liisa von Hellens,et al.  A qualitative case study of the adoption and use of an agricultural decision support system in the Australian cotton industry: The socio-technical view , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[21]  H. Pretzscha,et al.  The single tree-based stand simulator SILVA : construction , application and evaluation , 2002 .

[22]  O. Hanseth,et al.  From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2000 .

[23]  Luc Boerboom Implementation, challenges and future directions of integrating services from the GIS and decision science domains; a case of Distributed Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation , 2012 .

[24]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  A Model for Individual Tree Development Based on Physiological Processes , 2002 .

[26]  Gabrielle Durepos Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[27]  Don V. Kerr Factors influencing the Development and Adoption of Knowledge Based Decision Support Systems for Small, Owner-Operated Rural Business , 2004, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[28]  B. Latour On Recalling Ant , 1999 .

[29]  Aziz Sheikh,et al.  Actor-Network Theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare , 2010, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[30]  Graham Pervan,et al.  A critical analysis of decision support systems research , 2005, J. Inf. Technol..

[31]  Graham Pervan,et al.  Eight key issues for the decision support systems discipline , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[32]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[33]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[34]  Ron Janssen,et al.  Spatial decision support systems: a user's perspective , 2005 .

[35]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[36]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[37]  Stan C. M. Geertman,et al.  Planning support systems: an inventory of current practice , 2004, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[38]  Nick Letch,et al.  Investigating cultural heritage data integration with an ANT perspective , 2013 .