Recursive feature elimination in random forest classification supports nanomaterial grouping
暂无分享,去创建一个
Bernhard Y. Renard | Andreas Luch | Martin Wiemann | Bryan Hellack | Anca Dinischiotu | Aileen Bahl | Mihaela Balas | Joep Brinkmann | Andrea Haase | B. Renard | M. Wiemann | A. Luch | A. Dinischiotu | Mihaela Balaș | A. Haase | J. Brinkmann | Aileen Bahl | B. Hellack
[1] Karin Aschberger,et al. Grouping of multi-walled carbon nanotubes to read-across genotoxicity: A case study to evaluate the applicability of regulatory guidance , 2019, Computational Toxicology.
[2] Adriele Prina-Mello,et al. Towards a nanospecific approach for risk assessment. , 2016, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[3] Jason Weston,et al. Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines , 2002, Machine Learning.
[4] Vicki Stone,et al. Nano-TiO2 – feasibility and challenges for human health risk assessment based on open literature , 2010, Nanotoxicology.
[5] Bertrand Michel,et al. Correlation and variable importance in random forests , 2013, Statistics and Computing.
[6] Jang Sik Choi,et al. Toxicity Classification of Oxide Nanomaterials: Effects of Data Gap Filling and PChem Score-based Screening Approaches , 2018, Scientific Reports.
[7] Tomasz Puzyn,et al. EU US Roadmap Nanoinformatics 2030 , 2018 .
[8] Achim Zeileis,et al. Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.
[9] Wendel Wohlleben,et al. Surface reactivity measurements as required for grouping and read-across: An advanced FRAS protocol , 2017 .
[10] Hugh J. Byrne,et al. Concern-driven integrated approaches to nanomaterial testing and assessment – report of the NanoSafety Cluster Working Group 10 , 2013, Nanotoxicology.
[11] Burcu F. Darst,et al. Using recursive feature elimination in random forest to account for correlated variables in high dimensional data , 2018, BMC Genetics.
[12] T. Webb,et al. Pulmonary toxicity study in rats with three forms of ultrafine-TiO2 particles: differential responses related to surface properties. , 2007, Toxicology.
[13] A Worth,et al. Grouping of nanomaterials to read-across hazard endpoints: from data collection to assessment of the grouping hypothesis by application of chemoinformatic techniques , 2018, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.
[14] Thomas A. J. Kuhlbusch,et al. Analytical methods to assess the oxidative potential of nanoparticles: a review , 2017 .
[15] Jerzy Leszczynski,et al. From basic physics to mechanisms of toxicity: the "liquid drop" approach applied to develop predictive classification models for toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. , 2014, Nanoscale.
[16] Robert Landsiedel,et al. Assessment of the oxidative potential of nanoparticles by the cytochrome c assay: assay improvement and development of a high-throughput method to predict the toxicity of nanoparticles , 2016, Archives of Toxicology.
[17] Achim Zeileis,et al. BMC Bioinformatics BioMed Central Methodology article Conditional variable importance for random forests , 2008 .
[18] W. Chan,et al. Prediction of nanoparticles-cell association based on corona proteins and physicochemical properties. , 2015, Nanoscale.
[19] Eugenia Valsami-Jones,et al. A strategy for grouping of nanomaterials based on key physico-chemical descriptors as a basis for safer-by-design NMs , 2014 .
[20] Mary Gulumian,et al. Dissolution and biodurability: Important parameters needed for risk assessment of nanomaterials , 2015, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.
[21] Christie M Sayes,et al. A framework for grouping nanoparticles based on their measurable characteristics , 2013, International journal of nanomedicine.
[22] Jean-Michel Poggi,et al. Variable selection using random forests , 2010, Pattern Recognit. Lett..
[23] Craig A. Poland,et al. Zeta potential and solubility to toxic ions as mechanisms of lung inflammation caused by metal/metal oxide nanoparticles. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.
[24] K. Hungerbühler,et al. Prediction of nanoparticle transport behavior from physicochemical properties: machine learning provides insights to guide the next generation of transport models , 2015 .
[25] Thomas A. J. Kuhlbusch,et al. In vivo effects: Methodologies and biokinetics of inhaled nanomaterials , 2018 .
[26] Kimberly F. Sellers,et al. Grouping nanomaterials : A strategy towards grouping and read-across , 2015 .
[27] Leo Breiman,et al. Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.
[28] Robert Landsiedel,et al. An in vitro alveolar macrophage assay for predicting the short-term inhalation toxicity of nanomaterials , 2016, Journal of Nanobiotechnology.
[29] Feng Yang,et al. A quantitative framework to group nanoscale and microscale particles by hazard potency to derive occupational exposure limits: Proof of concept evaluation , 2017, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[30] David B Warheit,et al. Pulmonary bioassay studies with nanoscale and fine-quartz particles in rats: toxicity is not dependent upon particle size but on surface characteristics. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.
[31] Philipp Probst,et al. Random forest versus logistic regression: a large-scale benchmark experiment , 2018, BMC Bioinformatics.
[32] Eleonore Fröhlich,et al. The role of surface charge in cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of medical nanoparticles , 2012, International journal of nanomedicine.
[33] Maryam Mobed-Miremadi,et al. Machine learning provides predictive analysis into silver nanoparticle protein corona formation from physicochemical properties. , 2018, Environmental science. Nano.
[34] Reinhard Kreiling,et al. A decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping). , 2015, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[35] M. Wiemann,et al. Application of short-term inhalation studies to assess the inhalation toxicity of nanomaterials , 2014, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.
[36] Tomasz Puzyn,et al. Comparing the CORAL and Random Forest Approaches for Modelling the In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Silica Nanomaterials , 2016, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.
[37] Hedwig M Braakhuis,et al. Physicochemical characteristics of nanomaterials that affect pulmonary inflammation , 2014, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.
[38] Antonio Marcomini,et al. Grouping and Read-Across Approaches for Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials , 2015, International journal of environmental research and public health.
[39] Enrico Burello,et al. A Mechanistic Model for Predicting Lung Inflammogenicity of Oxide Nanoparticles , 2017, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.
[40] Yung-Seop Lee,et al. Enriched random forests , 2008, Bioinform..
[41] F. Alessandrini,et al. Surface modifications of silica nanoparticles are crucial for their inert versus proinflammatory and immunomodulatory properties , 2014, International journal of nanomedicine.
[42] J. West,et al. Correlating nanoscale titania structure with toxicity: a cytotoxicity and inflammatory response study with human dermal fibroblasts and human lung epithelial cells. , 2006, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.
[43] A E Nel,et al. Implementation of alternative test strategies for the safety assessment of engineered nanomaterials , 2013, Journal of internal medicine.
[44] Gregory V. Lowry,et al. Progress towards standardized and validated characterizations for measuring physicochemical properties of manufactured nanomaterials relevant to nano health and safety risks , 2018 .
[45] Shikha Gupta,et al. Nano-QSAR modeling for predicting biological activity of diverse nanomaterials , 2014 .
[46] Reinhard Kreiling,et al. Case studies putting the decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping) into practice. , 2016, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.