HIPPARCOS trigonometrical parallaxes make it possible to compare the location of Tc-rich and Tc-poor S stars in the Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram: Tc-rich S stars are found to be cooler and intrinsically brighter than Tc-poor S stars. The comparison with the Geneva evolutionary tracks re- veals that the line marking the onset of thermal pulses on the asymptoticgiantbranch(AGB)matcheswelltheobservedlimit between Tc-poor and Tc-rich S stars. Tc-rich S stars are, as ex- pected, identied with thermally-pulsing AGB stars of low and intermediate masses, whereas Tc-poor S stars comprise mostly low-mass stars (with the exception of 57 Peg) located either on the red giant branch or on the early AGB. Like barium stars, Tc-poor S stars are known to belong exclusively to binary sys- tems,andtheirlocationintheHRdiagramisconsistentwiththe average mass of 1:6 0: 2M derived from their orbital mass- function distribution (Jorissen et al. 1997, A&A, submitted). A comparison with the S stars identied in the Magellanic Clouds and in the Fornax dwarf elliptical galaxy reveals that they have luminosities similar to the galactic Tc-rich S stars. However, most of the surveys of S stars in the external systems did not reach the lower luminosities at which galactic Tc-poor S stars are found. The deep Westerlund survey of carbon stars in the SMC uncovered a family of faint carbon stars that may be the analogues of the low-luminosity, galactic Tc-poor S stars.
[1]
E. Milone,et al.
The origins, evolution, and destinies of binary stars in clusters
,
1996
.
[2]
A. Tutukov,et al.
Evolution of Stars: The Photospheric Abundance Connection
,
1991
.
[3]
J.-C. Mermilliod,et al.
The Hipparcos input catalogue
,
1987
.
[4]
C. C. Wu,et al.
IUE ultraviolet spectral atlas
,
1982
.
[5]
Carlos Jaschek,et al.
The classification of stars
,
1987
.
[6]
Nancy Houk,et al.
Michigan catalogue of two-dimensional spectral types for the HD stars
,
1975
.