Application and use of the ISEW for assessing the sustainability of a regional system: A case study in Italy

The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) was introduced by Daly and Cobb in 1989 in order to integrate the information embodied in GDP. Since economic growth implies externalities and market failures, and a portion of it can be defined as “uneconomic”, the ISEW method introduces some corrections and adjustments to the GDP calculation framework. The ISEW has been calculated for a number of nations but it has been rarely applied to sub-national systems. Its calculation at the local level is important especially in case of administrative decentralization, and autonomy and responsibility of local authorities in certain fields. For this reason, a more and more comprehensive knowledge of the characteristics and peculiarities of the territorial system they manage is necessary. This paper presents the results of the ISEW calculation for Tuscany, a region in central Italy, in the period 1971–2006. This is one of the few attempts to apply the ISEW in time series at the regional level. Final results show that a discrepancy between ISEW and GDP appeared in the 1970s. Social and environmental pressures increased during the period under study making the gap equal to about 30 percent of regional GDP in 2006. The ISEW can be used also as a tool for evaluating policies, but further adjustments in calculation of certain items are considered necessary for taking into account and evaluating punctual policies. A case of energy policy is presented.

[1]  Rafael Ziegler,et al.  Political Perception and Ensemble of Macro Objectives and Measures: The Paradox of the Index for Sustainable Economic Welfare , 2007, Environmental Values.

[2]  Silvia Tiezzi,et al.  The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (Isew) for Italy , 1998 .

[3]  S. Gil,et al.  An index of sustainable economic welfare for Poland , 2003 .

[4]  C. Leipert,et al.  The Origins Of Research On Defensive Expenditures: A Dialog With Christian Leipert , 2008 .

[5]  Engelbert Stockhammer,et al.  The index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) as an alternative to GDP in measuring economic welfare. The results of the Austrian (revised) ISEW calculation 1955-1992 , 1997 .

[6]  Clive Hamilton,et al.  The genuine progress indicator methodological developments and results from Australia , 1999 .

[7]  J. Tobin,et al.  Is growth obsolete , 1973 .

[8]  Beatriz E Castañeda An index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) for Chile , 1999 .

[9]  C. Leipert,et al.  National Income and Economic Growth: The Conceptual Side of Defensive Expenditures , 1989 .

[10]  Enzo Tiezzi,et al.  The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) for a Local Authority: A Case Study in Italy , 2006 .

[11]  Luc Int Panis,et al.  ExternE Externalities of Energy Methodology 2005 Update , 2013 .

[12]  F. M. Pulselli The Road to Sustainability: GDP and future generations , 2008 .

[13]  Is measuring genuine progress at the sub-national level useful? , 2008 .

[14]  Y. Ahmad,et al.  Environmental Accounting for Sustainable Development , 1989 .

[15]  S. Islam,et al.  Diminishing and negative welfare returns of economic growth: an index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) for Thailand , 2005 .

[16]  T. Power For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future , 1993 .

[17]  Brent Bleys Proposed changes to the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare: An application to Belgium , 2008 .

[18]  Carlos Alberto Brebbia,et al.  Ecosystems and Sustainable Development II , 1999 .

[19]  Tim Jackson,et al.  Sustainable Economic Welfare in Sweden: A Pilot Index 1950-1992 , 1999 .

[20]  Ian Moffatt,et al.  Measuring sustainability: A time series of alternative indicators for Scotland , 1999 .

[21]  K. Bagstad,et al.  Opportunities and challenges in applying the Genuine Progress Indicator/Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare at local scales , 2007 .

[22]  N. Marks,et al.  Measuring regional progress: regional index of sustainable economic well-being (R-ISEW) for all the English regions , 2008 .

[23]  Modifying the ISEW and taking into account energy. , 2009 .

[24]  J. Farley,et al.  Ecological Economics : Principles and Applications , 2016 .

[25]  Herman E. Daly,et al.  Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development , 1997 .

[26]  G. Munda “Measuring Sustainability”: A Multi-Criterion Framework , 2005 .

[27]  M. Anielski,et al.  THE GENUINE PROGRESS INDICATOR — 1998 UPDATE , 1999 .

[28]  Manfred Max-Neef,et al.  Economic growth and quality of life: a threshold hypothesis , 1995 .

[29]  Eric Neumayer,et al.  On the Methodology of Isew, Gpi and Related Measures: Some Constructive Suggestions and Some Doubt on the 'Threshold' Hypothesis , 2000 .

[30]  Nic Marks,et al.  Measuring sustainable economic welfare. A pilot index: 1950-1990 , 1994 .

[31]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Estimates of the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) for Vermont, Chittenden County and Burlington, from 1950 to 2000 , 2004 .

[32]  Eric Neumayer,et al.  The ISEW -- not an Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare , 1999 .

[33]  Carolyn C. Pertsova,et al.  Ecological economics research trends , 2007 .