Reproducibility of self-reported melanoma risk factors in a large cohort study of Norwegian women

We studied the test–retest reproducibility of melanoma risk factors, including the use of sunscreen and sun protection factor (SPF), in a self-administered exposure follow-up questionnaire from the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study, a large national population-based cohort. In 2002, a random sample of 2000 women (46–75 years) received the questionnaire twice, about 3 months a part (response 75%). Kappa (κ) was 0.77 for freckling when sunbathing [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74-0.81]. Weighted kappa, κw, for sunbathing vacations to southern latitudes and solarium use last 5 years was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.68–0.74) and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.67–0.73), respectively. Reproducibility was also good for sunscreen use (yes/no) on specific occasions (0.64≤κ≤0.74) and the corresponding SPF. Spearman's correlation coefficient (rs) for SPF on sunbathing vacations to southern latitudes was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.69–0.77) for today and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.66–0.76) for 10 years ago. For the eight most common sunscreen brands, reproducibility was lower for use (yes/no) (0.31≤κ≤0.60) than for SPF (0.38≤rs≤0.87). The frequency of sunburn and sunbathing vacations in Norway or outside southern latitudes had fair reproducibility (κw was 0.49 and 0.47, respectively). Other studies have also found it challenging to measure sunburn. This study was larger than previous studies, permitting subgroup analyses. In conclusion, the overall reproducibility of the questionnaire was acceptable and not affected by age, education or skin color. In particular, our study has added new knowledge about the reproducibility of sunscreen use and SPF.

[1]  Kathylynn Saboda,et al.  Risk Group, Skin Lesion History, and Sun Sensitivity Reliability in Squamous Cell Skin Cancer Progression , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[2]  T. Dwyer,et al.  Validity and Reliability of Adult Recall of Past Sun Exposure in a Case-Control Study of Multiple Sclerosis , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[3]  P. Laake,et al.  Test-retest reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and estimated effects on disease risk in the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study (NOWAC) , 2006, Nutrition journal.

[4]  B. Armstrong,et al.  Reliability and Validity of a Telephone Questionnaire for Estimating Lifetime Personal Sun Exposure in Epidemiologic Studies , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention.

[5]  P. Autier Cutaneous malignant melanoma: facts about sunbeds and sunscreen , 2005, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[6]  J. Coebergh,et al.  Public awareness about risk factors could pose problems for case-control studies: the example of sunbed use and cutaneous melanoma. , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[7]  L. Dennis,et al.  Test-retest of self-reported exposure to artificial tanning devices, self-tanning creams, and sun sensitivity showed consistency. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  J. Coebergh,et al.  Cutaneous malignant melanoma in Europe. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[9]  P. Levy Measurement Error and Misclassification in Statistics and Epidemiology: Impacts and Bayesian Adjustments , 2004 .

[10]  H. Adami,et al.  A prospective study of pigmentation, sun exposure, and risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma in women. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  L. Dennis,et al.  Sunscreen Use and the Risk for Melanoma: A Quantitative Review , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  Lund Eiliv,et al.  External validity in a population-based national prospective study – the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study (NOWAC) , 2003, Cancer Causes & Control.

[13]  Bruce K. Armstrong,et al.  A Prospective Study of Pigmentation, Sun Exposure, and Risk of Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma in Women , 2003 .

[14]  Y. Brandberg,et al.  Stability of questionnaire items measuring behaviours, attitudes and stages of change related to sun exposure , 2002, Melanoma research.

[15]  S. Bastuji‐Garin,et al.  Cutaneous malignant melanoma, sun exposure, and sunscreen use: epidemiological evidence , 2002, The British journal of dermatology.

[16]  C. Fortes Reproducibility of skin characteristic measurements and reported sun exposure history. , 2002, International journal of epidemiology.

[17]  C Frost,et al.  Correcting for measurement error in binary and continuous variables using replicates , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  P. Laake,et al.  Exposure misclassification: bias in category specific Poisson regression coefficients , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  D. English,et al.  Reproducibility of reported measurements of sun exposure in a case-control study. , 1998, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[20]  J. Mark Elwood,et al.  Melanoma and sun exposure: An overview of published studies , 1997, International journal of cancer.

[21]  H. Olsson,et al.  Reproducibility of a self-administered questionnaire for assessment of melanoma risk. , 1996, International journal of epidemiology.

[22]  D. Easton,et al.  Risk of cutaneous melanoma associated with pigmentation characteristics and freckling: Systematic overview of 10 case‐control studies , 1995 .

[23]  M. Berwick,et al.  A BRIEF ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: Reliability of Reported Sunburn History in a Case-Control Study of Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma , 1995 .

[24]  S. Wacholder,et al.  Blind assignment of exposure does not always prevent differential misclassification. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[25]  W. Willett,et al.  Recall (report) bias and reliability in the retrospective assessment of melanoma risk. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[26]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  The association of use of sunbeds with cutaneous malignant melanoma and other skin cancers: A systematic review , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[28]  N. Kreiger,et al.  Reliability of self-reports: data from the Canadian Multi-Centre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). , 2004, Chronic diseases in Canada.

[29]  P. Gies,et al.  Solar and ultraviolet radiation , 2004 .

[30]  M. Weinstock,et al.  Development and reliability of a brief skin cancer risk assessment tool. , 2003, Cancer detection and prevention.

[31]  M. Kumle,et al.  External validity in a population-based national prospective study--the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study (NOWAC). , 2003, Cancer causes & control : CCC.

[32]  M. Courtenay,et al.  Skin Cancer , 1980, Nursing management.

[33]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Globocan 2000 : cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide , 2001 .

[34]  M. Berwick,et al.  Reliability of reported sunburn history in a case-control study of cutaneous malignant melanoma. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[35]  S D Walter,et al.  Estimation of test error rates, disease prevalence and relative risk from misclassified data: a review. , 1988, Journal of clinical epidemiology.