Spotlighting: Emergent Gender Bias in Undergraduate Engineering Education

“Spotlighting” is the singling out of women by gender in ways that make them uncomfortable. It has three forms: Type I is singling out with the intention to harm (overt sexism); Type II is doing so with neutral intentions (tacit sexism); and Type III, a new type of gender bias, is singling out women with the intention to help them. In a longitudinal, qualitative study including three types of schools, undergraduate women engineers named Type III spotlighting due to women in engineering (WIE) programs as the direct or indirect cause of their primary gender‐bias difficulties. Two changes to WIE programs are suggested to reduce Type III spotlighting: (1) offer their benefits either to all students or based on academic, not demographic, criteria, and (2) expand WIE programs to “conduct in engineering” programs that would emphasize pre‐emption of non‐professional behavior, and would be more inclusive of other biases.

[1]  W. R. Niblett.  Higher Education , 1972, Nature.

[2]  Henry Petroski,et al.  To Engineer is Human , 1985 .

[3]  E. Ivey,et al.  Recruiting More Women into Engineering and Science. , 1988 .

[4]  C. Ethington,et al.  Women’s Selection of Quantitative Undergraduate Fields of Study: Direct and Indirect Influences , 1988 .

[5]  Jane Zimmer Daniels,et al.  Women in Engineering: A Program Administrator's Perspective. , 1988 .

[6]  S. Traweek,et al.  Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists , 1988 .

[7]  Eleanor Baum,et al.  Why So Few Women in Engineering , 1989 .

[8]  P. Blosser.  Procedures To Increase the Entry of Women in Science-Related Careers. ERIC/SMEAC Science Education Digest No. 1. , 1990 .

[9]  L. Yates.  A Tale Full of Sound and Fury--Signifying What? Feminism and Curriculum Policy in Australia. , 1991 .

[10]  S. Harding.  Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women's Lives , 1993 .

[11]  Sheila Tobias,et al.  They're Not Dumb, They're Different: Stalking the Second Tier , 1991 .

[12]  C. M. Shaw,et al.  Women in engineering: planning and persistence pay off , 1991, Proceedings Frontiers in Education Twenty-First Annual Conference. Engineering Education in a New World Order.

[13]  Emily M. Wadsworth,et al.  Women's Activities and Women Engineers: Expansions over Time. , 1992 .

[14]  D. Eden,et al.  Female Engineers , 1992 .

[15]  L. Grant,et al.  Women in Engineering: Gender, Power, and Work Place Culture. , 1993 .

[16]  Myra Sadker,et al.  Failing at fairness : how our schools cheat girls , 1995 .

[17]  R. Felder,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. III. Gender Differences in Student Performance and Attitudes , 1995 .

[18]  Karen L. Tonso.  Student Learning and Gender , 1996 .

[19]  K. Tonso.  The Impact of Cultural Norms on Women , 1996 .

[20]  Joan Acker,et al.  Pleasure, Power, & Technology: Some Tales of Gender, Engineering, and the Cooperative Workplace. , 1996 .

[21]  E. M. Wadsworth.  Sloan Foundation Initiatives at Purdue University: longitudinal results [engineering education] , 1997, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1997 27th Annual Conference. Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change.

[22]  Clifford Adelman,et al.  Women and men of the engineering path: A model for analyses of undergraduate careers , 1998 .

[23]  Sarah Kuhn,et al.  When worlds collide: Engineering students encounter social aspects of production , 1998 .

[24]  Karen L. Tonso,et al.  Engineering Gender--Gendering Engineering: What About Women in Nerd-Dom?. , 1998 .

[25]  Flis Henwood.  Exceptional women? Gender and technology in U.K. higher education , 1999, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[26]  F. Heenwood,et al.  Exceptional women? Gender and technology in U.K. higher education , 1999 .

[27]  W. Faulkner.  The Power and the Pleasure? A Research Agenda for “Making Gender Stick” to Engineers , 2000 .

[28]  G. Huang,et al.  Entry and Persistence of Women and Minorities in College Science and Engineering Education. , 2000 .