Ruminococcus albus 8 Mutants Defective in Cellulose Degradation Are Deficient in Two Processive Endocellulases, Cel48A and Cel9B, Both of Which Possess a Novel Modular Architecture

ABSTRACT The cellulolytic bacterium Ruminococcus albus 8 adheres tightly to cellulose, but the molecular biology underpinning this process is not well characterized. Subtractive enrichment procedures were used to isolate mutants of R. albus 8 that are defective in adhesion to cellulose. Adhesion of the mutant strains was reduced 50% compared to that observed with the wild-type strain, and cellulose solubilization was also shown to be slower in these mutant strains, suggesting that bacterial adhesion and cellulose solubilization are inextricably linked. Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis showed that all three mutants studied were impaired in the production of two high-molecular-mass, cell-bound polypeptides when they were cultured with either cellobiose or cellulose. The identities of these proteins were determined by a combination of mass spectrometry methods and genome sequence data for R. albus 8. One of the polypeptides is a family 9 glycoside hydrolase (Cel9B), and the other is a family 48 glycoside hydrolase (Cel48A). Both Cel9B and Cel48A possess a modular architecture, Cel9B possesses features characteristic of the B2 (or theme D) group of family 9 glycoside hydrolases, and Cel48A is structurally similar to the processive endocellulases CelF and CelS from Clostridium cellulolyticum and Clostridium thermocellum, respectively. Both Cel9B and Cel48A could be recovered by cellulose affinity procedures, but neither Cel9B nor Cel48A contains a dockerin, suggesting that these polypeptides are retained on the bacterial cell surface, and recovery by cellulose affinity procedures did not involve a clostridium-like cellulosome complex. Instead, both proteins possess a single copy of a novel X module with an unknown function at the C terminus. Such X modules are also present in several other R. albus glycoside hydrolases and are phylogentically distinct from the fibronectin III-like and X modules identified so far in other cellulolytic bacteria.

[1]  P. Mosoni,et al.  Characterization of a spontaneous adhesion-defective mutant of Ruminococcus albus strain 20 , 2001, Archives of Microbiology.

[2]  E. Bayer,et al.  The cellulosome concept as an efficient microbial strategy for the degradation of insoluble polysaccharides. , 1999, Trends in microbiology.

[3]  E. Bayer,et al.  Specialized cell surface structures in cellulolytic bacteria , 1987, Journal of bacteriology.

[4]  M. Morrison,et al.  Adherence of the Gram-Positive BacteriumRuminococcus albus to Cellulose and Identification of a Novel Form of Cellulose-Binding Protein Which Belongs to the Pil Family of Proteins , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[5]  H. Ohara,et al.  Sequence of egV and Properties of EgV, a Ruminococcus albus Endoglucanase Containing a Dockerin Domain , 2000, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.

[6]  Ashit K Shah,et al.  The Fibronectin Type 3-Like Repeat from the Clostridium thermocellum Cellobiohydrolase CbhA Promotes Hydrolysis of Cellulose by Modifying Its Surface , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[7]  Raphael Lamed,et al.  Cellulosomal Scaffoldin-Like Proteins fromRuminococcus flavefaciens , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.

[8]  T. Kawabata,et al.  Solution Structure of the Fibronectin Type III Domain fromBacillus circulans WL-12 Chitinase A1* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  I. Kataeva,et al.  Duplication and Recombination : Evidence for Gene Thermocellum Clostridium Cellulosome Component of Cellulase Gene Encoding Celk, a Major Cloning and Sequence Analysis of a New , 1999 .

[10]  F. Rainey,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis by 16S ribosomal DNA sequence comparison reveals two unrelated groups of species within the genus Ruminococcus. , 1995, FEMS microbiology letters.

[11]  Raphael Lamed,et al.  A Novel Cellulosomal Scaffoldin fromAcetivibrio cellulolyticus That Contains a Family 9 Glycosyl Hydrolase , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[12]  N. Gilkes,et al.  Cellulose hydrolysis by bacteria and fungi. , 1995, Advances in microbial physiology.

[13]  P. Béguin,et al.  The cellulosome: an exocellular, multiprotein complex specialized in cellulose degradation. , 1996, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[14]  E Setter,et al.  Characterization of a cellulose-binding, cellulase-containing complex in Clostridium thermocellum , 1983, Journal of bacteriology.

[15]  B Henrissat,et al.  Glycoside hydrolases and glycosyltransferases: families and functional modules. , 2001, Current opinion in structural biology.

[16]  J. Gong,et al.  Factors affecting adhesion of Fibrobacter succinogenes subsp. succinogenes S85 and adherence-defective mutants to cellulose , 1989, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[17]  K S Wilson,et al.  Crystal structure of a bacterial chitinase at 2.3 A resolution. , 1994, Structure.

[18]  C. Ouzounis,et al.  Evolution of immunoglobulin-like modules in chitinases: their structural flexibility and functional implications. , 1997, Folding & design.

[19]  A. Burkovski,et al.  Two‐dimensional electrophoretic analysis of Corynebacterium glutamicum membrane fraction and surface proteins , 2000, Electrophoresis.

[20]  A. Kistner,et al.  A versatile assay for total cellulase activity using U-[14C]-labelled bacterial cellulose , 1986, Biotechnology Letters.

[21]  J. Wu,et al.  Product inhibition of the recombinant CelS, an exoglucanase component of the Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome , 1995, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[22]  B. Henrissat,et al.  Classification of glycoside hydrolases and glycosyltransferases from hyperthermophiles. , 2001, Methods in enzymology.

[23]  Karen P. Scott,et al.  EndB, a Multidomain Family 44 Cellulase from Ruminococcus flavefaciens 17, Binds to Cellulose via a Novel Cellulose-Binding Module and to Another R. flavefaciens Protein via a Dockerin Domain , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[24]  H. Rakotoarivonina,et al.  Adhesion to cellulose of the Gram-positive bacterium Ruminococcus albus involves type IV pili. , 2002, Microbiology.

[25]  H. Ohara,et al.  Characterization of the Cellulolytic Complex (Cellulosome) from Ruminococcus albus , 2000, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.

[26]  J. Miron,et al.  Features of Fibrobacter intestinalis DR7 mutant which is impaired with its ability to adhere to cellulose. , 1998, Anaerobe.

[27]  B. White,et al.  Analysis of antibiotic susceptibility and extrachromosomal DNA content of Ruminococcus albus and Ruminococcus flavefaciens. , 1988, Canadian journal of microbiology.

[28]  J Kirby,et al.  Dockerin-like sequences in cellulases and xylanases from the rumen cellulolytic bacterium Ruminococcus flavefaciens. , 1997, FEMS microbiology letters.

[29]  H. Flint,et al.  Three multidomain esterases from the cellulolytic rumen anaerobe Ruminococcus flavefaciens 17 that carry divergent dockerin sequences. , 2000, Microbiology.

[30]  E. Bayer,et al.  Subcellular distribution of glycanases and related components in Ruminococcus albus SY3 and their role in cell adhesion to cellulose , 2001, Journal of applied microbiology.

[31]  R. E. Hungate,et al.  Phenylacetic acid stimulation of cellulose digestion by Ruminococcus albus 8 , 1983, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[32]  K. Schleifer,et al.  The cellulose-decomposing bacteria and their enzyme systems. , 1992 .

[33]  E. Bayer,et al.  Cellulosomes-structure and ultrastructure. , 1998, Journal of structural biology.

[34]  B. Henrissat,et al.  A scheme for designating enzymes that hydrolyse the polysaccharides in the cell walls of plants , 1998, FEBS letters.

[35]  R. Haser,et al.  Cel9M, a New Family 9 Cellulase of the Clostridium cellulolyticum Cellulosome , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[36]  E. Bayer,et al.  Cellulose, cellulases and cellulosomes. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[37]  S. Champ,et al.  CelE, a Multidomain Cellulase fromClostridium cellulolyticum: a Key Enzyme in the Cellulosome? , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[38]  E. Bayer,et al.  Isolation and properties of a major cellobiohydrolase from the cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[39]  R. E. Hungate,et al.  Effect of 3-Phenylpropanoic Acid on Capsule and Cellulases of Ruminococcus albus 8 , 1984, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[40]  M. M. Bradford A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. , 1976, Analytical biochemistry.

[41]  I. S. Pretorius,et al.  Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology , 2002, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[42]  D. Kelly,et al.  The prokaryotes: an evolving electronic resource for the microbiological community - , 2002 .

[43]  J. Miron,et al.  Adhesion to cellulose by Ruminococcus albus: a combination of cellulosomes and Pil-proteins? , 2000, FEMS microbiology letters.

[44]  R. Onodera,et al.  Rumen microbes and digestive physiology in ruminants. , 1997 .

[45]  E. Bayer,et al.  Adherence of Clostridium thermocellum to cellulose , 1983, Journal of bacteriology.

[46]  C. Tardif,et al.  The processive endocellulase CelF, a major component of the Clostridium cellulolyticum cellulosome: purification and characterization of the recombinant form , 1997, Journal of bacteriology.

[47]  Raphael Lamed,et al.  Novel Organization and Divergent Dockerin Specificities in the Cellulosome System of Ruminococcus flavefaciens , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[48]  D. Kilburn,et al.  Characterization of CenC, an enzyme from Cellulomonas fimi with both endo- and exoglucanase activities , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[49]  Morag,et al.  An adhesion‐defective mutant of Ruminococcus albus SY3 is impaired in its capability to degrade cellulose , 1998 .

[50]  V. Zverlov,et al.  Multidomain Structure and Cellulosomal Localization of the Clostridium thermocellum Cellobiohydrolase CbhA , 1998 .