Parametric calibration study of fused filament fabrication printing with large nozzle diameter

The trend toward the scalability of fused filament fabrication requires strategies to reduce printing time. One way consists in using calibrated nozzles with larger diameters. However, the reduction in manufacturing time is accompanied by reduced printing resolution and changes in the control of the material’s viscous behavior. In this work, the parametric calibration was performed on a 1 mm diameter nozzle printing cubic models in polylactic acid. The procedure was divided into three steps: (i) identification of printing defects; (ii) systematic parametric study (based on Taguchi method); and (iii) interactive parametric refinement. The calibration of the 1 mm nozzle involved the analysis of six fused filament fabrication variables: layer thickness, extrusion temperature, extrusion multiplier, infill speed, perimeters speed, and first layer speed. Their effects were analyzed considering esthetic quality, dimensional and shape conformity, mass, and compression modulus variation of the parts. Despite the high degree of customization of fused filament fabrication printers, the results show that switching to a larger nozzle is not “plug-and-play”. The user needs to know the correlations between the printability of the material and the effects of the variables involved in slicing, especially extrusion multiplier and layer thickness. Both variables act directly on the main problem of printing with a 1 mm nozzle, controlling the extrusion volume with the best accommodation of the material between and within layers. The main contribution of the study highlights that large diameter nozzles can induce poorly distributed accumulations of excess material, which decreases the quality of surfaces, deforms parts, destabilizes dimensions, and disorganizes the mesostructure (reducing rigidity) of the models. Finally, the parameter refinement process defined a base configuration for future studies to improve 3D printing with 1 mm nozzles.

[1]  M. Bieliński,et al.  Influence of Extruder’s Nozzle Diameter on the Improvement of Functional Properties of 3D-Printed PLA Products , 2022, Polymers.

[2]  D. Gregor-Svetec,et al.  Effect of Printing Process Parameters on the Shape Transformation Capability of 3D Printed Structures , 2021, Polymers.

[3]  M. Jałbrzykowski,et al.  Processing Technologies for Crisis Response on the Example of COVID-19 Pandemic—Injection Molding and FFF Case Study , 2021, Processes.

[4]  Mohammad Abuabiah,et al.  Gaining a better understanding of the extrusion process in fused filament fabrication 3D printing: a review , 2021, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[5]  Elizabeth G. Bishop,et al.  Using Large-Scale Additive Manufacturing as a Bridge Manufacturing Process in Response to Shortages in Personal Protective Equipment during the COVID-19 Outbreak , 2020, International journal of bioprinting.

[6]  E. Pei,et al.  An Overview of Material Extrusion Troubleshooting , 2020 .

[7]  D. F. Smaradhana,et al.  The effect of nozzle hole diameter of 3D printing on porosity and tensile strength parts using polylactic acid material , 2020 .

[8]  Shahriar Bakrani Balani,et al.  Influence of printing parameters on the stability of deposited beads in fused filament fabrication of poly(lactic) acid , 2019, Additive Manufacturing.

[9]  Azamat G. Tavitov,et al.  Strength of PLA Components Fabricated with Fused Deposition Technology Using a Desktop 3D Printer as a Function of Geometrical Parameters of the Process , 2018, Polymers.

[10]  Leonardo Santana,et al.  A study of parametric calibration for low cost 3D printing: Seeking improvement in dimensional quality , 2017 .

[11]  Jiabing Hu,et al.  Nozzle Problem Analysis and Optimization of FDM 3D Printer , 2017 .

[12]  R. Jerez-Mesa,et al.  A comparative study of the thermal behavior of three different 3D printer liquefiers , 2017, Mechatronics.

[13]  A. F. Silva,et al.  Fused deposition modeling with polypropylene , 2015 .

[14]  Youjia Xu,et al.  A fundamental study of parameter adjustable additive manufacturing process based on FDM process , 2018 .

[15]  Tassilo Moritz,et al.  Thermoplastic 3D Printing—An Additive Manufacturing Method for Producing Dense Ceramics , 2015 .

[16]  A. K. Sood,et al.  Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts , 2010 .