Connectivity at the hillslope scale: identifying interactions between storm size, bedrock permeability, slope angle and soil depth.

The links between soil water movement at the plot scale and runoff generation at the hillslope scale are highly non-linear and still not well understood. As such, a framework for the general characterization of hillslopes is still lacking. Here we present a number of virtual experiments with a 3D physically-based finite element model to systematically investigate the interactions between some of the dominant controls on subsurface stormflow generation. We used the well-studied Panola experimental hillslope to test our base case simulation and used the surface and subsurface topography and the stormflow data of this site as a framework for a subsequent series of virtual experiments. The parameterization of the soil and bedrock properties was based on field measurements of soil moisture and saturated hydraulic conductivity. After calibration and testing against multiple evaluation criteria including distributed trench flow data and internal tensiometric response, we varied slope angle, soil depth, storm size and bedrock permeability across multiple ranges to establish a set of response surfaces for several hillslope flow metrics. We found that connectivity of subsurface saturation was a unifying descriptor of hillslope behavior across the many combinations of slope type. While much of the interplay between our four hillslope variables was intuitive, several interactions in variable combinations were found. Our analysis indicated that, e.g. interactions between slope angle, soil depth and storm size that caused unexpected behavior of hydrograph peak times were the result of the interplay between subsurface topography and the overlying soil mantle with its spatially varying soil depth distribution. Those interactions led to new understanding of process controls on connectivity .

[1]  Felix Naef,et al.  A decision scheme to indicate dominant hydrological flow processes on temperate grassland , 2003 .

[2]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[3]  S. K. Jenson,et al.  Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information-system analysis , 1988 .

[4]  M. Mosley Streamflow generation in a forested watershed, New Zealand , 1979 .

[5]  Christopher Spence,et al.  On the relation between dynamic storage and runoff: A discussion on thresholds, efficiency, and function , 2007 .

[6]  Y. Onda,et al.  The role of subsurface runoff through bedrock on storm flow generation , 2001 .

[7]  Louise J. Bracken,et al.  The concept of hydrological connectivity and its contribution to understanding runoff‐dominated geomorphic systems , 2007 .

[8]  Henry Lin Temporal Stability of Soil Moisture Spatial Pattern and Subsurface Preferential Flow Pathways in the Shale Hills Catchment , 2006 .

[9]  Keith Beven,et al.  The role of bedrock topography on subsurface storm flow , 2002 .

[10]  Ross Woods,et al.  The changing spatial variability of subsurface flow across a hillside , 1996 .

[11]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 1. A 147‐storm analysis of the Panola hillslope , 2006 .

[12]  Philippe Cattan,et al.  Spatially Distributed Water Fluxes in an Andisol under Banana Plants: Experiments and Three‐Dimensional Modeling , 2008 .

[13]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[14]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 2. The fill and spill hypothesis , 2006 .

[15]  S. Burges,et al.  Parameter estimation for a physics‐based distributed hydrologic model using measured outflow fluxes and internal moisture states , 2007 .

[16]  Aldo Fiori,et al.  Numerical analyses of subsurface flow in a steep hillslope under rainfall: The role of the spatial heterogeneity of the formation hydraulic properties , 2007 .

[17]  Peter Lehmann,et al.  Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Rainfall Threshold for Hillslope Outflow: an Emergent Property of Flow Pathway Connectivity , 2022 .

[18]  K. N. Hjerdt,et al.  A new topographic index to quantify downslope controls on local drainage , 2004 .

[19]  R. Woods,et al.  Catchment Classification and Hydrologic Similarity , 2006, Geography Compass.

[20]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Quantifying contributions to storm runoff through end‐member mixing analysis and hydrologic measurements at the Panola Mountain Research Watershed (Georgia, USA) , 2001 .

[21]  Horst H. Gerke,et al.  Modeling Two‐Dimensional Water Flow and Bromide Transport in a Heterogeneous Lignitic Mine Soil , 2006 .

[22]  J. McDonnell,et al.  A virtual experiment on the effects of evaporation and intensity smoothing by canopy interception on subsurface stormflow generation , 2006 .

[23]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Tracer and hydrometric study of preferential flow in large undisturbed soil cores from the Georgia Piedmont, USA , 1999 .

[24]  David R. Montgomery,et al.  Physics‐based continuous simulation of long‐term near‐surface hydrologic response for the Coos Bay experimental catchment , 2007 .

[25]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  The role of lateral pipe flow in hillslope runoff response: an intercomparison of non-linear hillslope response , 2005 .

[26]  M. Tani Runoff generation processes estimated from hydrological observations on a steep forested hillslope with a thin soil layer , 1997 .

[27]  J. Buttle,et al.  Mapping first‐order controls on streamflow from drainage basins: the T3 template , 2006 .

[28]  Keith Beven,et al.  NEW METHOD DEVELOPED FOR STUDYING FLOW ON HILLSLOPES , 1996 .

[29]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Using numerical modelling to evaluate the capillary fringe groundwater ridging hypothesis of streamflow generation , 2006 .

[30]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Effect of bedrock permeability on subsurface stormflow and the water balance of a trenched hillslope at the Panola Mountain Research Watershed, Georgia, USA , 2007 .

[31]  M. G. Anderson Encyclopedia of hydrological sciences. , 2005 .

[32]  James M. Buttle,et al.  Coupled vertical and lateral preferential flow on a forested slope , 2002 .

[33]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  Moving beyond heterogeneity and process complexity: A new vision for watershed hydrology , 2007 .

[34]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Virtual experiments: a new approach for improving process conceptualization in hillslope hydrology , 2004 .

[35]  C. Pringle HYDROLOGIC CONNECTIVITY AND THE MANAGEMENT OF BIOLOGICAL RESERVES: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[36]  M. Woo,et al.  Hydrology of subarctic Canadian Shield: heterogeneous headwater basins , 2006 .

[37]  J. McDonnell,et al.  A mechanistic assessment of nutrient flushing at the catchment scale , 2008 .

[38]  James M. Buttle,et al.  Hydrologic coupling of slopes, riparian zones and streams: an example from the Canadian Shield , 2004 .

[39]  Yuichi Onda,et al.  Dynamic runoff connectivity of overland flow on steep forested hillslopes: Scale effects and runoff transfer , 2008 .

[40]  R. Moore,et al.  Throughflow variability on a forested hillslope underlain by compacted glacial till , 2000 .