This paper examines the impact of targeting technology on competition between local and general outlets. In the absence of targeting (say, of location), local outlets have an advantage in that there is a tighter match between readers and local consumers that advertisers wish to attract. Targeting restores that advantage to general outlet increasing its demand for advertising but also allows it to more efficiently allocate scarce advertising space. In a baseline case, we demonstrate that such space is the critical constraint and if it can be easily expanded then the adoption of targeting has no impact on profits or competition. We then analyze three extensions of the model in which targeting does benefit general outlets: advertising space is limited or costly; there is heterogeneity across local media markets; or advertisers are capacity-constrained (creating competition between outlets on the advertising-side of the industry). Even in these cases, however, the impact of targeting is mitigated by the fact that when targeting is introduced, it is optimal for outlets to cut back on their supply of ad space.
[1]
J. M. Villas-Boas,et al.
The Targeting of Advertising
,
2005
.
[2]
Avi Goldfarb,et al.
Privacy Regulation and Online Advertising
,
2010,
Manag. Sci..
[3]
Simon P. Anderson,et al.
Market Provision of Broadcasting: A Welfare Analysis ∗
,
2003
.
[4]
Dirk Bergemann,et al.
Targeting in Advertising Markets: Implications for Offline vs. Online Media
,
2010
.
[5]
Avi Goldfarb,et al.
Search Engine Advertising: Channel Substitution when Pricing Ads to Context
,
2010,
Manag. Sci..
[6]
Dirk Bergemann,et al.
Targeting in Advertising Markets: Implications for New and Old Media
,
2009
.
[7]
Ambarish Chandra.
Targeted Advertising: The Role of Subscriber Characteristics
,
2008
.
[8]
Ambarish Chandra,et al.
TARGETED ADVERTISING: THE ROLE OF SUBSCRIBER CHARACTERISTICS IN MEDIA MARKETS*
,
2009
.
[9]
Jerrold H. May,et al.
Targeted Advertising Strategies on Television
,
2006,
Manag. Sci..