Evidence of enhancement of spatial attention during inhibition of a visuo-motor response

A visuo-motor task was used as the setting for a study into inhibition in six healthy volunteers using fMRI. The task involved responding to colored stimuli, which appeared at random positions in the left and right visual field, with the corresponding hand. The volunteers were asked to respond to green colored stimuli ("go" response) and to inhibit responses to red stimuli ("no-go" response). The task was presented in a block design with blocks of three types; only "go" trials, a pseudo-random mixture of "go" and "no-go" tasks ("go/no-go" block), and "visual control." ANCOVA analysis of the fMRI data was performed within the framework of SPM99. Increased activation in the go vs visual control comparison was found in the bilateral motor and medial premotor cortices associated with the action of the button press response, as well as parietal regions attending to the task of identifying the visual field. The go/no-go vs visual control comparison showed a similar pattern, plus additional prefrontal areas that have previously been shown to be associated with inhibition. The direct comparison of the go and go/no-go blocks highlighted large differences not only in the prefrontal cortices, associated with inhibition, but also particularly in the right parietal cortex. We interpret the increased parietal activation, during inhibition, as representing a heightened spatial attention required for the correct execution of the inhibition task.

[1]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Multimodal Image Coregistration and Partitioning—A Unified Framework , 1997, NeuroImage.

[2]  Jieun Kim,et al.  Effects of Verbal Working Memory Load on Corticocortical Connectivity Modeled by Path Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data , 2002, NeuroImage.

[3]  C. Colby,et al.  Spatial representations for action in parietal cortex. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  A. Paans,et al.  Brain Activation Related to the Representations of External Space and Body Scheme in Visuomotor Control , 2001, NeuroImage.

[5]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  CHAPTER 64 – A Unified Statistical Approach for Determining Significant Signals in Location and Scale Space Images of Cerebral Activation , 1996 .

[6]  D. Gitelman,et al.  Functional Specificity of Superior Parietal Mediation of Spatial Shifting , 2001, NeuroImage.

[7]  R. Kawashima,et al.  Functional anatomy of GO/NO-GO discrimination and response selection : a PET study in man , 1996 .

[8]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Neuronal Activity in the Lateral Intraparietal Area and Spatial Attention , 2003, Science.

[9]  G H Glover,et al.  Selective effects of methylphenidate in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a functional magnetic resonance study. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  B. J. Casey,et al.  The Effect of Preceding Context on Inhibition: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[12]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  Katya Rubia,et al.  An fMRI study of reduced left prefrontal activation in schizophrenia during normal inhibitory function , 2001, Schizophrenia Research.

[14]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  A Developmental Functional MRI Study of Prefrontal Activation during Performance of a Go-No-Go Task , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  R. Myers Quantification of brain function using PET , 1996 .

[16]  N. J. Herrod,et al.  Maintaining and shifting attention within left or right hemifield. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  Douglas C. Noll,et al.  Activation of Prefrontal Cortex in Children during a Nonspatial Working Memory Task with Functional MRI , 1995, NeuroImage.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Detecting Activations in PET and fMRI: Levels of Inference and Power , 1996, NeuroImage.

[19]  G. Glover,et al.  Error‐related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[20]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Mapping Motor Inhibition: Conjunctive Brain Activations across Different Versions of Go/No-Go and Stop Tasks , 2001, NeuroImage.

[22]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Event‐related fMRI study of response inhibition , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[23]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  No‐go dominant brain activity in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[24]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Immature Frontal Lobe Contributions to Cognitive Control in Children Evidence from fMRI , 2002, Neuron.

[25]  A M Paans,et al.  The distribution of cerebral activity related to visuomotor coordination indicating perceptual and executional specialization. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  Paul B. Johnson,et al.  Premotor and parietal cortex: corticocortical connectivity and combinatorial computations. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.

[27]  Joel R. Meyer,et al.  A large-scale distributed network for covert spatial attention: further anatomical delineation based on stringent behavioural and cognitive controls. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  M. Erb,et al.  Activation of Cortical and Cerebellar Motor Areas during Executed and Imagined Hand Movements: An fMRI Study , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.