Constraints on the coding of sound frequency imposed by the avian interaural canal

SummaryExtracellular recordings were made from the midbrain auditory area to determine the limits of auditory frequency sensitivity in a variety of birds. The audiograms of some species show a consistent missing frequency range of 1/3 to 1/2 an octave, to which no neurons are tuned. All species, except owls, have a low upper frequency limit in comparison with mammals of similar headwidth. A consideration of both the upper frequency limits and the missing frequency ranges led to the conclusion that frequencies which do not generate localization cues are not represented in the midbrain. The upper frequency limit appears to match the upper limit of generation of significant interaural and monaural intensity cues to localization. The variation of these cues with frequency was examined through a simple model of the birds' sound receiving system which incorporated the interaural canal and considered the tympanic membranes as pressure difference receivers. Apart from coraciiform species, which have low upper frequency limits matching the frequency of the primary missing frequency band of other species, and owls, which have high upper frequency limits, the upper frequency limits of the birds studied are inversely related to head-width.The argument for missing frequency ranges being related to nonlocalizable frequencies is simpler, for it has been found previously, using cochlear microphonic recording, that within a bird's audiogram there are frequency regions with poor directionality cues. These regions appear to correspond to the missing frequency ranges.

[1]  P. Morse Vibration and Sound , 1949, Nature.

[2]  H. Heffner,et al.  Hearing in the elephant (Elephas maximus) , 1979 .

[3]  M. Konishi,et al.  Space and frequency are represented separately in auditory midbrain of the owl. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  D. Irvine Interaural intensity differences in the cat: Changes in sound pressure level at the two ears associated with azimuthal displacements in the frontal horizontal plane , 1987, Hearing Research.

[5]  E. Knudsen Auditory and visual maps of space in the optic tectum of the owl , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  Hearing in the frog: dynamics of the middle ear , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  D. B. Lewis,et al.  Directional Hearing in the Japanese Quail (Coturnix Coturnix Japonica): II. Cochlear Physiology , 1980 .

[8]  D. B. Lewis,et al.  Directional Hearing in the Japanese Quail (Coturnix Coturnix Japonica): I. Acoustic Properties of the Auditory System , 1980 .

[9]  E. Knudsen Sound Localization in Birds , 1980 .

[10]  K. G. Hill,et al.  Structure and function of the auditory system of the cicada,Cystosoma saundersii , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[11]  R. Woodworth,et al.  PSYCHIATRY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY , 1906 .

[12]  N. Fletcher,et al.  Acoustical analysis of the auditory system of the cricket Teleogryllus commodus (Walker). , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Lindsay M. Aitkin,et al.  The response properties of auditory neurones in the midbrain of the domestic fowl (Callus gallus) to monaural and binaural stimuli , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.

[14]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Sound transmission through the avian interaural pathways , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[15]  O. S. Wakeford,et al.  Lateralization of tonal stimuli by the cat. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Michael B. Calford,et al.  Avian interaural canal enhances interaural delay , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[17]  B Masterton,et al.  The evolution of human hearing. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  A R Palmer,et al.  Mechanical properties of the frog ear: vibration measurements under free- and closed-field acoustic conditions , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[19]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Coding of sound location and frequency in the auditory midbrain of diurnal birds of prey, families accipitridae and falconidae , 1985, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[20]  M. Konishi,et al.  The owl's interaural pathway is not involved in sound localization , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[21]  P. I. M. Johannesma,et al.  Directional hearing in the grassfrog (Rana temporaria L.). II. Acoustics and modelling of the auditory periphery , 1986, Hearing Research.

[22]  R. Dooling Behavior and psychophysics of hearing in birds , 1978 .

[23]  C. Smith Recent Advances in Structural Correlates of Auditory Receptors , 1981 .